Excerpts

The expected negative correlation between the MIS-D refocusing subscale and the dysfunctional aspect of perfectionism was only marginally significant ( r = −0.132, p = 0.058; hypothesis 5d).

For low performers , the main effect for TMS site was borderline significant [ F (1,7) = 5.107; p = 0.058; η p 2 = 0.422], with the main effect of congruency [ F (3,21) = 1.264; p = 0.312; η p 2 = 0.153] and interaction between site and congruency being non-significant [ F (3,21) = 2.293; p = 0.11; η p 2 = 0.247].

For the Modern Combat group, the improvement in d ' from pre ( M = 2.70, SD = 0.56) to post training ( M = 3.02, SD = 0.28) for the 2 target 6 distractor condition approached significance, t (13) = 2.08, p = 0.058, Cohen's d = 0.84.

In a similar vein, two-sample t -tests between 6-year-old TD and 8-year-old ASD children showed a marginally significant effect for saccades between the target and the relational location, t (43.74) = 1.95, p = 0.058, but no effects for saccades between the target and the non-relational location, t (44) = 0.82, p = 0.419.

A borderline significant two-way interaction was found between Target Type and Target Depth, F (1,23) = 3.978, p = 0.058, with participants responding more rapidly to the pure tone targets ( M = 535 ms) than to the white noise targets ( M = 549 ms) in the front, but more slowly to pure tone targets ( M = 551 ms) than to white noise targets ( M = 513 ms) in the rear space.

The interaction of “time” × “group,” however, was not significant and showed only a trend toward significance [ F (1,28) = 3.92, p = 0.058].

A time effect was noted in DTW_C, with borderline significance ( F = 3.67, p = 0.058).

However, workplace vigor, defined as “high levels of energy and resilience, the willingness to invest effort, not being easily fatigued, and persistence in the face of difficulties,” approached significance at p = 0.058 ( Schaufeli et al., 2006 ).

Meanwhile, there was a marginally significant difference between the participants’ risk-seeking index in the L-SRP/class comparison and the L-SRP/school comparison, t (66) = 1.930, p = 0.058.

The high mood group were more likely to entertain thoughts about the TSST relative to the low mood group, however, the trend just failed to reach significance, χ 2 (2) = 5.683, p = 0.058, V = 0.508.

The different statement was chosen more frequently than same and not disorders ( same : p = 0.003, not disorders : p = 0.001; p -values were adjusted using Benjamini-Hochberg procedures); however, the difference between different and differentiation unnecessary only approached significance ( p = 0.058).

Subgroup analyses of the TD group revealed marginal significance in the correlation between reaction time and reading comprehension performance at a high level of difficulty ( r 22 = –0.42, p = 0.058) as well as between reaction time and the total number of animal words generated ( r 22 = 0.389, p = 0.067).

Critically, the four-way (Condition × Space × Distance × Experiment) interaction approached significance [ F (10,165) = 1.78, p = 0.058, η 2 = 0.10], suggesting that the different types of training induced specific effects on PPS representation.

Unpleasant Feelings While Processing the Campaigns In addition, a 2 × 2 ANOVA on unpleasant feelings revealed a marginally significant interaction ( F (1, 307) = 3.635, p = 0.058).

For young adults, the effect motivation condition just failed to reach significance, F (2,26) = 3.18, p = 0.058, η 2 = 0.20.

In the areas responsible for the word identification system (i.e., left triangular part of the IFG and left insula), only marginally significant effects were observed in the response to the types of words [left IFG: F (2,44) = 3.04, p = 0.058; left insula: F (2,44) = 3.17, p = 0.052].

The regression model explained 14.0% of the variance in this criterion variable, which was marginally significant [ F (3, 49) = 2.668, p = 0.058].

Planned paired t -tests between targets surrounded by fearful flanker faces compared to all other flankers (average) were significant for emotion recognition accuracy ( t (28) = 2.18, p = 0.038) and revealed a statistical trend for reaction time ( t (28) = 1.98, p = 0.058) ( Figure 5 ).

The interaction term between Wave 2 sleep duration and Wave 2 cognitive function showed a marginally significant positive prediction for Wave 3 mental health ( β = −0.058, t = −1.897, p = 0.058).

We observed a strong significant positive correlation between Reduced Mind-wandering and Silence (components of the Silencing category) ( r = 0.72, p < 0.001), a significant negative correlation between Attentional Effort and Reduced Mind-wandering ( r = −0.49, p < 0.05), and a correlation that approached significance between Attentional Effort and Silence ( r = -0.40, p = 0.058) ( Figure 3B ).

The effect of distractor location was marginally significant, F (2,28) = 3.89, MSE = 1682, p = 0.0583, η p 2 = 0.12, showing larger interference at the repeated location (14 ms) as compared to the non-repeated location (2 ms).

We found a trend toward significance for the main effect of the congruency of the priming [ t (850.76) = −1.894, p = 0.0586].

Among the univariate tests, only the DDF subscale was significant, F (1,45) = 5.65, p = 0.022, whereas a prominent trend that approached significance was found for the EOT subscale, F (1,45) = 3.76, p = 0.059.

Lastly, we found a marginally significant main effect of phase on maternal nonintrusiveness ( p = 0.059, η p 2 = 0.07; see Figure 3 ).

Results demonstrate that tangible resources show a marginally significant mean value of the slope factor (slope mean = -0.04, p = 0.059; T1–3 means = 3.47, 3.42, and 3.41, respectively), which suggests that the mean level of tangible resources show a decreasing trend over time.