Excerpts

The interaction effect between input mode and text difficulty was marginally significant, F (1, 58) = 3.81, p = 0.056, indicating that in general, insertions made by the dictation group were more sensitive to text difficulty than those made by the typing group. 4.3.2.

Normative arousal ratings indicated that positive (mean = 5.24) and neutral (mean = 4.31) images were significantly different from one another in arousal (b = 0.926, t 93 = 4.112, Bonferroni-corrected p < 0.001, 95% CI = [0.377, 1.475]), while the difference between negative (mean = 4.85) and neutral images was marginally significant (b = 0.539, t 93 = 2.391, Bonferroni-corrected p = 0.056, 95% CI = [−0.011, 1.088]).

Significant correlations were obtained between the percentages of immediate choices and mean N2 peak amplitudes of all conditions on FCz ( r = -0.415, p = 0.011) and nearly significant correlation on mean of all selected electrodes ( r = -0.205, p = 0.056), indicating that the N2 amplitudes over the frontal region may predict individual’s choice.

The increase in switch cost of 54 ms in the repetition compared to the intermediate condition was only marginally significant, t (29) = 2.0, p = 0.056.

However, the main effect for the Cost to Opponent approached significance [ F (1,148) = 3.72, p = 0.056, η p 2 = 0.025]—in that participants may have reported overall greater success in their predictions under the Low Cost condition ( M = 12.69) than under the High Cost condition ( M = 11.70).

This effect was significant from sub-block 1 to sub-block 3 [ t (20) = −3.57; p = 0.001] as a result of a significant increase from sub-block 1 to sub-block 2 [ t (20) = −2.55; p = 0.005] and a strong trend from sub-block 2 to sub-block 3 [ t (20) = −1.67; p = 0.056; all tests one-tailed, uncorrected for multiple comparisons].

The three-way interaction was marginally significant, F (2,144) = 2.95, p = 0.056, η p 2 = 0.04 ( Figure 5 ).

For the 12-month-old infants significant changes in RTP as a function of time occurred for the Non-native stimuli only, indicated by the marginally significant Window × Language interaction, F (2, 20) = 3.46, p = 0.056, η p 2 = 0.26.

The correlation approached significance in channel 44, r (21) = -0.403, p = 0.056.

For lateral sites, the ANOVA results revealed a marginally significant main effect of Grammaticality ( F (1,35) = 3.917, p = 0.056, η p 2 = 0.101).

The curvature along the line of disagreement was also marginally significant (curvature test statistic = 0.08, p = 0.056), pointing to a convex surface and suggesting that the willingness to confront injustice decreases toward the midpoint of both scales.

Analysis of the random effects structure revealed that the Subject ID random intercept was marginally significant (Wald Z = 1.91, p = 0.056), accounting for 14% of the total variance (ICC = 0.14).

Memory condition exhibited near-significant trend toward predicting lower sadness recovery, b = −1.9007, p = 0.056, 95% CI [−3.8529, 0.0516].

GPA was found to have a nearly significant influence on PAL (Estimate = −17.280, SE = 8.413, t = −2.054, p -value = 0.056). 3.8 Mean weekday and weekend steps The analysis of mean weekday steps revealed a significant effect of learning environment type (Online: Estimate = 750.630, SE = 374.150, t = 2.006, p -value = 0.050), but the intercept was not significant (estimate = 5065.490, SE = 3550.890, t = 1.427, p -value = 0.172).

The main effect of reason for group membership was only marginally significant, F (2, 281) = 2.91, p = 0.056, η 2 p = 0.01.

From the results of RTs, it was found that the main effect of group was marginally significant ( F (1, 77) = 3.779, p = 0.056, η 2 = 0.047), with the RT of the LSA (54.03 ± 503.97) being significantly shorter than that of the HSA group (256.57 ± 439.37); the main effect of the congruency type was significant ( F (1, 77) = 61.604, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.444), and the RTs to congruent stimuli (110.56 ± 460.38) were significantly shorter than those to incongruent stimuli (200.04 ± 482.96).

The correlation between chronological age and right-hand use in the grasp-to-construct task approached significance ( r = 0.16; p = 0.056).

Interestingly, the interaction between voice category and gender approached significance [ F (4.4,727.8) = 2.2, p = 0.056, η 2 = 0.004] and would have suggested that the resistance of TRANS listeners occurred more toward actors on the extremities of the human range such as basses and sopranos than toward categories in the middle.

Alone condition individuals showed no evidence of an increase in task engagement VC, t < 1; data regarding HR reactivity scores was only marginally significant, t (47) = 1.95, p = 0.056, d = 0.57 ( M = 4.94, SD = 17.54).

When self-control was replaced by impulsivity, a marginally significant tendency was found for an interaction between alcohol associations and trait impulsivity in the expected direction ( beta = 0.15, p = 0.056), lending partial support for the alternative moderator hypothesis.

Second order partial difference between the square-radial and the square-paraboloidal figures was significant [ t (28) = 1.14, p = 0.006], whereas the partial difference between the square-radial and the square-elliptic figures reached marginal significance ( p = 0.056).

However, Duration remained a significant predictor of Strategy LC even after accounting for Action LC, β = 0.14, t (101) = 2.83, p < 0.01, with BSpan still being a marginally significant predictor of Strategy LC, β = 0.11, t (101) = 1.94, p = 0.056.

However, a marginally significant interaction between Deviant type and Group was yielded, F (1,28) = 3.962, p = 0.056.

The analysis yielded a marginally significant main effect of Valence Type [ F (2, 70) = 2.94, p = 0.056, η 2 p = 0.078] and a significant Valence Type x Accent Group interaction [ F (1.96, 68.83) = 3.72, p = 0.030, η 2 p = 0.096].

Only the correlation between item memory for phonological similar items and non-word reading was marginally significant, r = -0.254, p = 0.056, N = 57, and even this association should be interpreted with a degree of caution given the fact that Table 2 contains 24 separate correlations.