Comparing the 7–13 condition with the random condition revealed a marginally significant effect of training level for target position 7, F (2,75) = 3.15, p = 0.048, η p 2 = 0.07.
Excerpts
However, a marginally significant interaction [ F (2.902,493.418) = 2.408, p = 0.048] indicated that the peak in preference for intermediate D was slightly lower, and preference for low D higher, in synthetic edge images compared to the other two variations.
However, the moderating role of gender on the association between celebrity worship and self-esteem received support as the interaction term was marginally significant (β = –0.04, p = 0.048).
approached significancep = 0.048
The only contrasts that were significant or approached significance were the Literal ∗ Site interaction at 300 ms (β = -0.342, SE = 0.155, t = 1.976, p = 0.048); the Metaphor ∗ Site interaction at 300 ms (β = -0.293, SE = 0.151, t = 1.939, p = 0.053) and the Literal ∗ Site interaction at 450 ms (β = -0.258, SE = 0.139, t = 1.860, p = 0.063).
showed a trendp = 0.048
TRANSFER OF TDT TRAINING The results of the FrACT, analyzed with paired t -tests, showed a trend toward improvement of the Vernier task [ t (11) = 2.22; p = 0.048, not corrected for multiple comparisons; otherwise p = 0.2, Bonferroni corrected] in the patient group (see Figure 5 ).
Beta-band PSD at electrode O1 showed a marginally significant negative correlation with flight time (r = −0.293, p = 0.048) but did not reach significance with the composite indicator F ( p = 0.096).
In addition, the interaction of perceptual load × group was marginally significant [ F (2, 76) = 3.368, p = 0.049, η p 2 = 0.081].
The Kruskal–Wallis test used to compare English productive vocabulary scores across the three groups showed a marginally significant effect of group, H(2) = 6, p = 0.049.
Perceptual thresholds for detecting coherent motion (the minimum coherence level guaranteeing 80% accuracy) were higher (lower performance level) in patients than in controls [controls: 25.05 ( SD = 16.05), patients: 43.25( SD = 36.06)]; the group difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.049, Cohen's d = 0.65).
borderline significanceP = 0.049
The present findings suggested that TDP was associated with increased BMI with borderline significance ( P = 0.049) and the prevalence of each category of BMI was similar between men with TDP and those without TDP.
As can be seen there was a highly significant cross-country variability in the distribution of all factors displayed in Tables 1 – 3 , with the exception of occupational status of interviewees ( p = 0.049) and “ concerns for my job ” ( p = 0.155) and “ stability of the global economy ” ( p = 0.067) in the near future ( Table 3 ).
Regarding the activities performed outside of professional activity, the Chi-square test showed a marginally significant trend in caregiving ( p = 0.049) and participation in household activities ( p = 0.025), both more frequently reported in the Imagery sector.
of borderline significancep = 0.049
This was the case in unadjusted and adjusted analyses, although this was of borderline significance in people bereaved by suicide ( p = 0.049).
Femininity was a marginally significant predictor of thin ideal internalization, with a small effect size (β = 0.1302, z = 1.97, p = 0.049), although the corresponding confidence interval included zero (95% CI [−0.0219, 0.4400]). 4 Discussion This study extends existing research by examining sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals in Romania, an Eastern European context largely underrepresented in the literature on eating disorders.
Overall effects of the experimental manipulation on the frequency of chills show a marginally significant difference in distribution of chills depending on listening conditions ( x 2 = 3.85, p = 0.049, φ = 0.23); this is reflective of a consistent nominal but non-significant pattern found for each piece, with all original conditions resulting in a higher frequency of chills responses across listeners.
The coefficient for the Duration was marginally significant ( p = 0.049), while the coefficients for Distance and Speed were not statistically significant.
Findings highlighted that the IUS-12 × NPOQ interaction, i.e., the conditional indirect effect, was slightly significant and positive ( b = 0.90, SE = 0.47, t = 1.92, p = 0.049, 99% CIs = 0.3107, 2.1192), thus suggesting that the path is moderated by IUS-12 scores.
A slight increase was found for S1 but it was only marginally significant with a low correlation coefficient (S1, slope = 0.032 blinks per minute, r (2) = 0.1, p = 0.049).
inverted) repeated-measures ANOVA revealed significant main effect of image ( F 1,3 = 194.90, p < 0.005), and a marginally significant effect of orientation ( F 1,3 = 10.00, p = 0.05).
Subsequent t -tests for paired samples revealed that in song, right BA 47 showed predominance over left BA 47 [ t (20) = −2.485, p < 0.022], whereas the nominally opposite lateralization in speech fell short of significance ( p > 0.05).
There was a marginally significant interaction between cued area size and cue style on accuracy, F (2,56) = 3.06, p = 0.05, but not response time, F (2,56) = 0.50, p = 0.61.
Moreover, the percentage of penalized trials showed a near-significant negative correlation with age (ρ = −0.263, p = 0.050).
approached significancep = 0.05
Trial Length A Mann–Whitney test indicated that mean trial length approached significance, U = 38.5, p = 0.05.
Section Methodological Considerations About RC Extraposition and ID) and slightly significant interaction between length and cumulative surprisal ( z = 2.571, p < 0.05).
This is because, in other parts of the DMN, we found a highly significant effect of age in posterior-ventral PCC during semantic matching ( x = −18 y = −68 z = 20, z -score = 5.2; at p < 0.05 FWE-corrected), with greater deactivations for younger than older subjects.