However, when we changed our analytical approach and controlled for baseline variance in BDI scores in an ANCOVA, the combination of both treatment groups, relative to the control group, had a marginally significant effect on BDI scores at T2, F (1, 70) = 2.78, p = 0.099, partial η 2 = 0.038.
Excerpts
a trend toward significancep = 0.099
There was also a trend toward significance in the beta band (peak frequency 15–29 ± 2 Hz; WSR, p = 0.099, Z = -1.647; Hits: Mean = 0.99, SEM = 0.01 μV 2 ; Misses: Mean = 1.03, SEM = 0.02 μV 2 ).
The differences for purpose in life were marginally significant ( F = 2.78, p = 0.099), showing a slight increase in the experimental group. 3.2.
Regarding gender differences, the relationship between resilience and the percentage of males was marginally significant, Q model = 2.719, df = 1, p = 0.099.
did not quite reach significancep = 0.099
The main effect of Predictive Cue did not quite reach significance for repeated nouns (β = −0.33, SE = 0.20, z = −1.65, p = 0.099), suggesting that the facilitation for a repeated noun from a L+H* predictive cue is merely numeric.
There was no significant difference between sides [ F (1,19) = 0.732, p = 0.403, η p 2 = 0.037] but a marginally significant interaction between condition and side [ F (2,38) = 2.650, p = 0.099, η p 2 = 0.122].
Each model included as independent variables the sociodemographic characteristics identified via the preliminary analyses as being associated with the dependent variable in question at a rate achieving or approaching significance ( p < 0.10).
In Column (2), however, the treatment group exhibits a marginally significant negative effect on conversion during the price promotion period (β = −0.00004, p < 0.1).
Specifically, physical access and usage both demonstrated marginally significant, negative direct effects on depressive symptoms (for physical access: β = −0.052, p < 0.1; for usage: β = −0.032, p < 0.1) ( Table 10 ).
For second-born children, prediction of sibling age gap on maternal parenting stress was marginally significant (β = −0.12, p < 0.1).
The correlation between the two subgroups is however only marginally significant [ rs (77) = 0.19, p < 0.1].
The positive effect of wastewater treatment remained significant (β = 0.158, p < 0.05), whereas the coefficient of ammonia nitrogen emissions became weaker and marginally significant (β = −0.132, p < 0.10).
The Number of Dominant Images A marginally significant association was found between “The number of dominant images” and the two groups of families ( χ 2 = 3.68, p < 0.10).
Small and marginally significant associations were found between PTQ and backward inhibition ( r = −0.18, p = 0.10) and switch cost ( r = 0.21, p = 0.07).
approached significancep < 0.1
The intercept effect in 10-month-olds was significant for the superordinate-level [beta = 0.25, t (110) = 2.00, p < 0.05], while the intercept effect approached significance in 10-month-olds for the living/non-living level [beta = 0.23, t (110) = 1.88, p < 0.1].
Simple slope analysis was conducted for Bus plunge as well because there was a weakly significant interaction between IAcc and moral choice ( B = 0.456, p < 0.1).
More importantly, the interaction effect between the reward type and product customer satisfaction was marginally significant [ F (2,362) = 2.950, p < 0.1, η 2 = 0.016].
Although gender only had a mildly significant effect on individual mindset measures ( p < 0.1 level) it showed a significant main effect on the total mindset score, F (1, 108) = 13.22, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.11, indicating a moderate gender-based difference in overall mindset.
However, after personal resources were entered into the equation, the direct effect of leadership psychological characteristics was marginally significant ( B = − 0.10, p < 0.1 ) and the effect of personal resources was significant ( B = −0.11, p < 0.05 ).
Although marginally significant ( p < 0.10), the effect is directional only and should be interpreted cautiously ( Pritschet et al., 2016 ).
On the between-level, EE is positively related to trait EL, but not to (aggregated) state EL (only having a marginally significant relationship, p < 0.10).
Estimates for Specifications 2 and 3 reduced similarly and were both marginally significant ( p < 0.10) in Model 2.
Marginally significant interactions ( p < 0.1) were explored with pairwise comparisons for the frontal and parietal electrode sites separately, with Bonferroni correction to correct for multiple comparisons.
In line with H5, we observe a marginally significant interaction effect of error risk taking and perceived organizational innovation climate (β = 0.16, p < 0.1, 95% CI [−0.00, 0.32]).
Finally, the total non-housing assets of a patient (T0ATOTN) is a marginally significant (P < 0.1) variable that has a negative correlation with the DV.