Although the interaction between L2 proficiency and Condition was only marginally significant (the effect of L2 proficiency on the T2-T4 contrast vs. the T2-T3 contrast: β = −0.70, SE = 0.41, t = −1.72, p = 0.086), we nevertheless conducted post hoc pairwise comparisons because it was directly relevant to the aims of the present study.
Excerpts
The Gender × Condition_c 2 interaction was marginally significant [β = −0.01740, SE = 0.01014, t (519.43) = −1.72, p = 0.0867], suggesting that the curvature differed slightly between males and females, with females showing a somewhat steeper change in TES across conditions.
a trend toward significancep = 0.087
Processing speed (OR = 1.635; 95%CI 1.049–2.55; p = 0.03) was the unique significant contributor to efficient ToM, showing a trend toward significance in visual memory (OR = 1.431; 95%CI 0.949–2.158; p = 0.087).
For players with medium scores (2nd tertile), we find a positive yet weakly significant effect ( p = 0.087) which becomes amplified and highly significant for those player As whose Raven's test score belongs to the 3rd tertile of the experimental sample ( p = 0.012).
Change in R 2 was only marginally significant from Model 1 to Model 2 (Δ R 2 = 0.02; p = 0.087) and from Model 1 to Model 3 (Δ R 2 = 0.05; p = 0.094), but not from Model 2 to Model 3 (Δ R 2 = 0.03; p = 0.176).
The difference between Real Human and 2D Anime ( M = 3.56, SD = 1.97) approached but did not reach significance ( p = 0.087).
However, while performance on a measure of mental flexibility (TMT B) was significantly faster ( F = 8.32, p = 0.011), the number of errors made increased, but only at a trend level of significance ( F = 3.35, p = 0.087).
A closer look at this interaction effect revealed that the 2nd-3rd Condition and the 3rd-3rd Condition were significantly slower than the single-referent 2nd-2nd Condition (2nd-3rd: β = 0.116, z = 2.301, p < 0.05; 3rd-3rd: β = 0.377, z = 6.90, p < 0.001) and that the slowdown in the 3rd-2nd Condition was marginally significant (β = 0.0703, z = 1.716, p = 0.087).
However, the interaction between training condition and school showed a marginal trend toward significance ( p = 0.087).
For exhaustion, the correlation was marginally significant ( r = −0.104, p = 0.087), but a separate analysis revealed a difference––the “behavior at work” aspect demonstrated a clear negative correlation with exhaustion ( r = −0.118, p = 0.044), but “personal lifestyle” did not ( r = −0.014, n.s.).
a trend toward significanceP = 0.087
On unadjusted analysis, there was a trend toward significance in the association between global FT burden and the likelihood of any AC visit [Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.11; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.99–1.24; P = 0.087 for every unit increase in the ENRICh FT score].
The main effect of frame was marginally significant, F (1, 68) = 3.0, p < 0.087, as subjects were more likely to select the best choice in the choice frame.
Beat ‘em up was not significant in this respect ( p = 0.243), Erotic was only marginally significant ( p = 0.087).
approached significancep = 0.087
No other interaction was significant but the three-way interaction approached significance [ F (1, 61) = 3.02, p = 0.087].
The two groups had a marginally significant difference in age with the mindfulness group slightly older [ t (36) = −1.755, p = 0.088], and a marginally significant difference in the interval between their two visits [ t (36) = −1.764, p = 0.089] with the mindfulness group slightly longer due to the longer time interval of the four subjects from the waiting list.
approached significancep = 0.088
None of the tests gained significance [ t (43) < 1.60, p > 0.118], solely methodological knowledge slightly approached significance [ t (43) = 1.75, p = 0.088] in favor of the participants in the concurrent condition.
For the theta band, the three-way interaction between the three factors was only a statistical trend [ F (8,152) = 1.77, p = 0.088, η p 2 = 0.09].
sound-symbolism Japanese ideophone event-related potential P2 cross-modal correspondence synaesthesia/synesthesia Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics and University College London The interaction between iconicity and electrode location only tended toward significance ( F = 2.045, p = 0.088).
We found that the main effect was marginally significant [ F (3, 24) = 2.45, p = 0.088].
a trend toward significancep = 0.088
The group × condition interaction did not reach conventional statistical significance but showed a trend toward significance [ F (2,70) = 2.52, p = 0.088, η2 p = 0.067].
This emotional word type effect was marginally significant during negative word processing, F (1, 29) = 3.109, p = 0.088.
However, entering the SVO after the PVQ-RR led to a marginally significant increase in explained variance of almost 1% (adjusted R 2 = 0.24, p = 0.088).
The results of simple effect analysis show that when Chinese is the matrix language, there is a nearly significant difference between the consistent and inconsistent groups [ t (636) = 1.710, p = 0.088].
INTENTIONAL BINDING TASK The GLM revealed a significant main effect of AGENCY, F 1,50 = 6.28, p = 0.015, and a marginally significant trend of JUDGMENT, F 1,50 = 3.032, p = 0.088.
large ( M = 61.25%, SD = 27.15%), the difference was only marginally significant, t (99) = 1.72, p = 0.088.