“a marginal trend toward significance”

Though the smoking showed a marginal trend toward significance ( p = 0.05) in univariate analysis, it was excluded from the final model possibly because the difference of smoking among the three groups was due to the relationship between smoking and gender, not real smoking and CAC.

However, subgroup analysis revealed a marginal trend toward significance in terms of DBP changes with treatment duration ≤ 6 months (MD = –0.82; 95% CI = –1.66 to –0.02; P = 0.05).

A marginal trend toward significance ( p = 0.05) was found for the interaction between time and either of the groups with regards to the total RBANS-H score.

Furthermore, SKAT showed a marginal trend toward significance after Bonferroni correction with Joubert Syndrome ciliopathy genes ( P = 0.05).

The total time of TUG and its component, TUG End-turnings, have a marginal trend toward significance in predicting cognitive decline in PD-MCI ( p =0.050 and p =0.051, respectively).

Also, postoperative ileus at less than 4 days was lower than in non-ERAS patients (15.6% vs 24.4%), but with a marginal trend toward significance ( P = .05).

The rs699947 CC-rs2010963 GG combination showed a marginal trend toward significance (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.125 to 1.021; p = 0.051).

In Model 3, the difference showed a marginal trend toward significance ( p = 0.051).

At 3 months post-surgery, BMI had no significant effect on HbA1c changes, while the type of surgical procedure demonstrated a marginal trend toward significance (P=0.052), suggesting that SG with PJB might result in greater HbA1c reduction compared to SG.

A reverse association between MHR and vitamin D levels demonstrated a marginal trend toward significance (β=-0.581, P = 0.052).

Meanwhile, under homozygote and recessive model, the difference between MS patients and controls also showed a marginal trend toward significance ( P = .052 and P = .056).

While the main effect of 5- HTT in women showed a marginal trend toward significance ( P = 0.052), with a medium effect size, the planned pairwise comparison indicated that women with 5- HTT- SS tended to have a higher angry MMN amplitude than women with 5- HTT- LL/LS (3.084 ± 0.424 μV, 1.788 ± 0.501 μV, P = 0.052, respectively).

Improvements in the score for the physical health domain of the WHOQOL‐BREF in the BTX‐A group showed a marginal trend toward significance ( p = 0.0521) at 4 weeks after the injection.

placebo (mean =0.65 mg/L in GIK, 0.84 mg/L in placebo), with a marginal trend toward significance ( P = 0.053).

Moreover, relative levels of DRD2 transcripts were higher in patients with larger tumors (T3-T4 status) than in patients with smaller tumors (T0-T2 status) in a marginal trend toward significance ( p =0.053; Fig. 1 C).

After adjusting for other variables, SBRT-TACE showed a marginal trend toward significance (HR = 0.695, 95% CI 0.480–1.005, P = 0.053) ( Table 2 ).

Through simple logistic regression, nonadherence was correlated with palliative coping (OR 3.4; CI: 1.02-11.47; P < 0.05) and had a marginal trend toward significance with more advanced phases of stress (OR 4.7; CI: 0.99-22.51; P = 0.053).

Each pattern of expression was calculated separately according to DFS (Figure 2 ) and AGR2 low /cyclin D1 low showed a certain trend toward significance on the survival curves ( P = .081) DFS analysis; AGR2 low /p21 low presented a marginal trend toward significance ( P = .054); and AGR2 low /p53 aberrant a strong difference between the curves ( P = .005) on DFS. 3.5.

However, this difference was statistically non-significant, although it showed a marginal trend toward significance ( P =0.055).

Comparison between the treatment condition and post-treatment condition revealed a marginal trend toward significance (β = 0.018, SE = 0.008, T = 2.368, p = 0.055).

This modulatory condition made the 24-h spatial memory above chance with a marginal trend toward significance ( t (15) = 2.07, P = 0.056), but it did not differ from the spatial memory in condition 2 ( t (15) = 0.67, P = 0.51) ( Fig. 3 C,D).

COL10A1 was also reduced after treatment, with the change in COL10A1 demonstrating a marginal trend toward significance (r = 0.29; p = 0.056) with change in height z-score over 24 weeks.

Emotional suppression showed a marginal trend toward significance ( β = 0.13, p = 0.056), while cognitive reappraisal ( β = 0.03, p = 0.626) and perceived social support ( β = −0.03, p = 0.348) were not significant predictors.

Additionally, a marginal trend toward significance was observed in the interaction between DEVIANT_CONDITION and HEMISPHERE [F (1,11) = 4.54, p = 0.056].

BST treatment improved the NDI score at follow-up when compared with that observed for the placebo group, with a marginal trend toward significance (27.76 ± 24.86 vs 43.52 ± 26.01, p = 0.0569, Figure 3A ).