Barely Significant

Excerpts

4,726 sentences · 1 filter applied

“Prostate cancer survival” demonstrated four trends with the first from January 2004 to June 2007 as a nonsignificant trend of -1.5 (-6.6, 3.8), and then a significant 6mPC of 25.3* from July 2008 to December 2010 (15.3, 123.9), followed by a significant 6mPC of -2.9* from January 2010 to June 2018 (-5.3, -0.5), and then finally an upward trend of 8.7 from January 2018 to the time of data collection (0.6, 17.5).
“Prostatectomy” (compared to prostate radiation), demonstrated two trends, with the first demonstrating a negative trend of -1.7* (-2.2, -1.1) from January 2004 to December 2015, and then became positive starting from January 2016 with a significant 6mPC of 3.3* (1.4, 3.5). “Prostate Radiation” (compared to prostatectomy) had one consistent significant trend throughout the study with a 6mPC of 1.22* (0.6, 1.9). “Pros
The term “prostate cancer” demonstrated two trends within the time period, with the first trend from January 2004 to December 2015 with a 6mPC of -1.7* (-2.1, -1.4), and then changing to a positive trend starting from January 2016 with a 6mPC of 1.2* (0.4-2.1) until the time of data collection. “Prostate cancer survival” demonstrated four trends with the first from January 2004 to June 2007 as a nonsignificant trend of -1.5 (-6.6, 3.8), and then a significant 6mPC of 25.3* from July 2008 to December 2010 (15.3, 123.9), followed by a significant 6mPC of -2.9* from January 2010 to June 2018 (-5.3, -0.5), and then finally an upward trend of 8.7 from January 2018 to the time of data collection (0.6, 17.5).
highly significantqualifiedgold
During the second and third months of therapy, a statistically highly significant difference in the extent of canine distalization in the laser group (TOTM2=1.04±0.1 mm; TOTM3=0.62±0.21 mm) in contrast to the control group (TOTM2=2.65±0.2 mm; TOTM3=2.11±0.24 mm) (p<0.01) was also found (Table 1 ).
Table 4 shows that three values of DE were taken prior to PS as well as prior to extubation; among these, it was observed that the third value recorded prior to PS,1.61±0.35, was strongly significant with a P value <0.001,followed by the first value recorded prior to PS, 1.68±0.41, which was considered moderately significant with a P value of 0.018.
The first is that it might be significant in terms of how the disease is treated clinically; a typical example of this is with nephrotic syndromes, where the identification of structural variants in genes related to podocytes provides evidence against immunosuppressive treatments that would otherwise be regularly administered over a period of several months [ 20 ].
Introduction Over the last quarter-century, there has been an increasing trend of cardiovascular disease, highlighting that cardiovascular diseases are the largest contributor to the disease burden of any disease group and are a major public health problem leading to premature deaths and morbidity across all states of India, particularly in this region [ 1 ].