In the initial multivariate Cox regression model including all variables significant in univariate analysis, residential area size remained borderline significant ( p = 0.047; HR 1.61, 95% CI: 1.01–2.56; see Table 3 ).
Excerpts
borderline significancep = 0.047
Nodal involvement showed borderline significance in univariable analysis, with N1 staging having an HR of 1.81 (95% CI, 1.01–3.24; p = 0.047).
When looking at the Karnofsky performance status of the entire cohort, a weakly significant reduction was observed during the follow-up ( p = 0.047).
Strong demethylation exhibited a borderline significant correlation with wild-type KRAS ( p = 0.048).
Finally, the variation in Clavien–Dindo classification was at the limit of significance ( p = 0.048), with the greatest fluctuations in group I, group II, and group IVa ( Table 1 ).
The symptom “pain during nutrition” was marginally significant compared to PEG placement before the start of therapy ( p = 0.048).
borderline significancep = 0.048
We observed a correlation between FNTB-173 6G > 5G and the histopathological grading at borderline significance ( p = 0.048).
The 5-year overall survival (OS) showed a positive trend in the treated group (PORT group: 67% vs. non-PORT group: 58%, p = 0.048) [ 22 ].
showed a trendp = 0.048
The NSABP B-42 trial, which randomized patients after five years of tamoxifen or AI to another five years of letrozole or placebo, showed a trend toward improved DFS at seven years (84.7% vs. 81.3%, HR 0.85, p = 0.048).
Moderately significant differences emerged in the skewness of K based on the CD3/20 prominence, which indicated a decrease in the skewness when CD20 was predominant over CD3 ( p = 0.048); an increase in the energy of K trans was also observed when CD8 was predominant over CD4 ( p = 0.019).
Although age showed a borderline significant association in the multivariate analysis before matching (HR, 1.039; 95% CI, 1.000–1.079; p = 0.048), it was not significant after matching.
borderline significancep = 0.049
As seen in Figure 3 A, patients treated with doses between 30 and 40 Gy had a better outcome than non-irradiated patients (HR 0.5, 95% CI 0.25–1.0), with borderline significance ( p = 0.049).
Furthermore, when dividing the age at diagnosis in quartiles (≤43 yrs, 44–54 yrs, 55–63 yrs and ≥64 yrs), the Kaplan-Meier survival curves continued to show a slightly significant difference among the groups ( p = 0.049) ( Figure 2 ).
The duodenal V33 Gy showed a marginally significant difference ( p -value = 0.049) between ground truth and plan recalculation.
Other borderline significant parameters included the absence ATG in conditioning (HR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1–2.3; p = 0.049), patient CMV seropositive status (HR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1–2; p = 0.041), and HLA-mismatched unrelated donor transplant (HR: 1.68; 95% CI: 1–2.8; p = 0.044) ( Supplementary Tables S5 and S6, Supplementary Figure S9 ).
Overall, a modest correlation was found between tumor concentrations and plasma trough levels of pazopanib ( ρ = 0.41), which was borderline significant ( p = 0.049); see Figure 2 .
borderline significancep = 0.049
41.1+ months for C/C genotype; univariate HR 2.18, 95% CI 0.98–4.85), though with borderline significance ( p = 0.049).
borderline significancep = 0.0499
In contrast, excessive fluid overload was only associated with significantly decreased pretransplant levels of phosphatidylinositols, and this difference reached only borderline significance ( p = 0.0499, r = 0.6958).
There was a significant difference in the pre- and postoperative changes in anxiety and borderline significant ( p = 0.0499) changes in pain scores across the three surgical modalities.
Only SNPs with nominally significant p -value < 0.05 in the analysis are shown.
On the contrary, NB-hop was not able to significantly stratify patients who died, even though we observed a positive trend (OS: p > 0.05, Figure 5 C).
Three other glycosylated ceramides were borderline significant, showing log2 fold changes > 0.75, but unadjusted P -values < 0.05.
The study reported the relative risk of PCa when seropositive for HPV18 as 2.59 (CI 95% = 1.17–5.75) and found the association between HPV18 and PCa to be highly significant ( p < 0.05) [ 81 ].
A comparison between the immunohistochemical factors studied ( Table 3 , χ 2 test confirmed by Fisher’s exact test) showed a positive correlation between CD8 and CD20 cells ( p = 0.01) and a strong trend ( p = 0.05) for positive CD8 and CD163 correlation.
In contrast, a study conducted on breast cancer reported a marginally significant reduction ( p = 0.05) in FTO gene expression in the breast tissue of patients with the AA homozygous genotype [ 54 ].