Barely Significant

Excerpts

3,451 sentences · 1 filter applied

moderately significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
When the findings in the correlation matrix are examined, there is a positive, weakly significant relationship between trust in public health authorities and distrust in health systems ( r = 0.162, p < 0.01), and a negative, moderately significant relationship with health literacy ( r =-0.405, p < 0.01) is available.
a significant trendp = 0.0100.2× alphagold
There was a significant trend in the survivor functions (i.e., probability of remaining free from diabetes) across the quartiles of greenspace ( p = 0.010) (Fig. 1b ); the probability of remaining free from diabetes amongst those in the greenest areas was 2.4% higher than those in the least green at age 80.
marginally significantP = 0.0130.3× alphagold
However, after fully adjusting for confounding factors (Model 3), while cardiovascular mortality risk remained elevated (HR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.00–1.23; P = 0.042), the overall risk of all-cause mortality associated with clinical obesity shifted to a marginally significant inverse relationship (HR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.89–0.99; P = 0.013) compared to the no obesity group.
showed a trendp = .0140.3× alpha
Those reporting a BI showed a trend towards greater declines on the SF-12 Physical health component summary scores than those without a BI (interaction effect: F (1, 5889) 6.05, p = .014: estimated marginal means at wave one and two: BI = 50.2 (SE .7): 47.0 (SE .8), Non-BI = 51.0 (SE .1), 50.2 (SE .1)).
quite significantp = 0.0150.3× alphaqualifiedgold
Also, there are no statistical differences in percent probability of dying among the four positive categories (excellent/very good/good/fair) (0.76%, 0.93%, 0.85%, 0.85%); but negative categories (poor/very poor) were more likely to die (1.21%, 1.39%) and when negative categories combined are compared to positive categories combined the difference in percent probability (0.86% vs 1.23%) is quite significant (p = 0.015).
a significant trendP = .0160.3× alphagold
Moreover, there was a significant association ( P = .010) between vitamin D status and sex, there being a higher prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency among the girls (77.5%) than boys (66.1%) Further analysis of the association between vitamin D status and BMI-for-age revealed a significant trend only for the boys (χ 2 = 5.958; P = .016) (Table 4 ).