Barely Significant

Excerpts

3,473 sentences · 1 filter applied

borderline significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
Age was significantly positively correlated with ED values of the normal marrow cavity of P1 with DBSCT (Philips) ( p = 0.027, r = 0.36), and the correlation was borderline significant with SSDECT (Canon) ( p = 0.05, r = 0.33).
highly significantp -value < 0.051.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For females, due to the non-normality of the data distribution, a non-parametric test, Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney was performed in order to detect any differences between the medians of chelae length for the two morphotypes, with the following results: a highly significant p -value < 0.05.
a decreasing trendp < 0.051.0× alphagold
Morphological Indices and Whole-Body Composition As shown in Table 4 , the HSI and VSI of the rice field eel exhibited a decreasing trend with increasing dietary threonine levels; the T4 group was significantly lower than the control group ( p < 0.05).
a decreasing trendp < 0.051.0× alphagold
The CP content of the LAB group, CE group and LAB + CE group was increased by 17.41%, 12.02%, and 20.49%, respectively, compared to that of the CON group, and no difference was noted for the CP on the 2-way interaction of LAB × CE.The NDFom content in the LAB treatment group was not significantly different compared to the CON group( p > 0.05), and both the CE and LAB + CE groups showed a decreasing trend in DNFom content compared with the CON group, with decreases of 16.41% and 18.74%, respectively ( p < 0.05).
a trend towards significancep ≤ 0.051.0× alpha
This is the claim that p -values between 0.05 and 0.1 indicate a trend towards significance, most commonly expressed in the rote statement “The threshold for significance was set at p ≤ 0.05, and trends were reported at p < 0.10”.