We see a weakly significant correlation between the distribution of these HGT events along the phylogeny of Methanococcales and OGT ( r 2 = −0.31, P value = 0.07) or OGT variations ( r 2 = 0.34, P value = 0.048).
← all phrases
“weakly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.11
In the literature
Although the association was only weakly significant (Wald test p-value = 0.07), this suggests that formal education increased the likelihood that men would know about family planning concepts, reducing the knowledge gap between the genders.
Higher MMP-9 and lower TIMP-1 concentrations were observed in women with PTB, but these differences were only weakly significant (p = 0.07 resp. p = 0.09).
When evaluating deformation variability similar trends were noted: the difference between Group 2D and Groups 1A and 1B proved statistically significant ( p = 0.01 *), while it was only weakly significant in relation to Group 1C ( p = 0.07).
The strongest effect for both treatment groups ( N = 76) in this study was found for the reciprocal factor ( p < 0.01; Model 1) even when controlling over the strength of the tie (the tie strength is weakly significant p = 0.07).
The results of the one-sided two-sample T -tests are presented as following: the control group, the participants who were simply asked for a donation, donated more than the first treatment group who were offered the tote bag as a thank-you gift ( p = 0.048, mean.c = 28.76, Sd-c = 25.65, mean.t1 = 24.01, Sd.t1 = 25.74); the difference become insignificant when compared to the second treatment group for whom the statement is given ( p = 0.205, mean.c = 28.76, Sd.c = 25.65, mean.t2 = 27.93, Sd.t2 = 25.42); however, the difference between the control groups is only weakly significant ( p = 0.070, mean.t1 = 24.01, Sd.t1 = 25.74, mean.t2 = 27.93, Sd.t2 = 25.42).
Statistical analyses indicate a weakly significant overall decline in the percentage of bites taken when people are protected by LLIN and IRS ( P = 0.071 and P = 0.011 for φ I and φ B , respectively; SI Appendix , Table S1 ).
When the interaction term sex × prenatal B-Pb was added to the model 3 linear regression, the term was not significant in the models at age 4 years, but at age 8 years the interaction term was weakly significant for verbal, performance and total IQ (p = 0.071, 0.065 and 0.033, respectively; Table 1 ).
The coefficients are statistically indistinguishable from zero, with the exception of Panel A Model 2, which is weakly significant ( p =0.071).
With respect to caries intensity, a significant difference was observed between children of mothers with primary and secondary education ( p = 0.042), while the difference between those with primary and tertiary education was only weakly significant in 2024 ( p = 0.073) ( Figure 4 ).
MWW U‐test also reported a weakly significant improvement of quadratic deviation from the mean (Q.DEV), for Heart Average Dose (one‐tail p ‐value = 0.074) and for Contra‐Lung V3Gy (one‐tail p ‐value = 0.162) suggesting a trend in reduction of values dispersion hence a better planning homogeneity after CB introduction. 3.4.
Similarly, a correlation analysis is executed to find whether there is a relationship between age and one’s fake news detection score, with a positive relationship weakly significant at the 90% interval level ( r = 0.089, p = 0.074).
Correlation tests also revealed a relatively low correlation of 0.28 between research impact and PBR and a weakly significant correlation ( p < 0.077) of 0.14 between research impact and PBR_FTEs.
TSS was significantly higher in samples that were positive for the CF, and EV markers by between 1 and 1.5 mg/L (p<0.05); these differences were only weakly significant for CF and EV markers (p = 0.078 and p = 0.096, respectively).
The relationship in H3 between perceived ease of use (PEU) and attitude towards use (ATU) holds true for Generation Z, with a strongly significant path coefficient (0.298, p = 0.001); it is lower (0.229) and weakly significant (p = 0.078) for Generation Y and vanishes (0.067) for Generation X + (p = 0.541).
In the fully interacted model, which is not included here due to lack of space, only the interaction term Enablement × Unequal Productivity is weakly significant ( p = 0.079) and positive.
We found that our differences are significant for individual extraction ( F = 5.95, p << 0.05, df = 3), weakly significant for proportion of stock extracted ( F = 2.23, p = 0.08), and non-significant for cooperation ( F = 0.3, p = 0.8).
solani , though this was only weakly significant this time in both the parametric and non-parametric tests ( Figure 4 C2; LSmeans = 2.30 ± 0.15 vs. 1.78 ± 0.15; t 25 =2.45, p = 0.08; Z = −1.73, p = 0.08). 3.3.
First, the parameter estimate is significant by using the log-linear model ( p = 0.03), while it is weakly significant by using the logistic model ( p = 0.08).
The results therefore showed a statistical significance for score N and H, both with a correlation index of 0.35 (p = 0.04), while the score O was weakly significant (p = 0.08).
Indeed, the analogous 39‐season correlation between anomalous monthly January d SHF d y ∼ 50 km at this location and the monthly January NAO index is negligible, but weakly significant 1 month later for the February NAO ( r = −0.28, p = 0.08).
The mean Skindex-16 score of female cases was more than male cases but was weakly significant ( P = 0.08; P < 0.10).
Weakly significant differences were also detected when comparing PA-exposed samples to PET-exposed or ASWS samples ( P = 0.08 and P = 0.07, respectively).
Our study found a higher complication rate (38%) with right-sided surgery than left (29%), which is only weakly significant (p = 0.08). 6) Analgesic technique Our study found that thoracic epidural was the most popular analgesic technique (61.1%) followed by paravertebral block (31%).
Although the slope was only weakly significant (P=0.0803), the P-value cannot be taken at face value due to the well-known post-model selection inferences issues ( 27 ).