Barely Significant
← all phrases

“weakly significant”

1,388 sentences · 1,388 papers · 1,784 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.11

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

weakly significantp = 0.0701.4× alphaqualifiedgold
The results of the one-sided two-sample T -tests are presented as following: the control group, the participants who were simply asked for a donation, donated more than the first treatment group who were offered the tote bag as a thank-you gift ( p = 0.048, mean.c = 28.76, Sd-c = 25.65, mean.t1 = 24.01, Sd.t1 = 25.74); the difference become insignificant when compared to the second treatment group for whom the statement is given ( p = 0.205, mean.c = 28.76, Sd.c = 25.65, mean.t2 = 27.93, Sd.t2 = 25.42); however, the difference between the control groups is only weakly significant ( p = 0.070, mean.t1 = 24.01, Sd.t1 = 25.74, mean.t2 = 27.93, Sd.t2 = 25.42).
weakly significantp = 0.0731.5× alphaqualifiedgold
With respect to caries intensity, a significant difference was observed between children of mothers with primary and secondary education ( p = 0.042), while the difference between those with primary and tertiary education was only weakly significant in 2024 ( p = 0.073) ( Figure 4 ).
weakly significantp ‐value = 0.0741.5× alphaqualifiedgold
MWW U‐test also reported a weakly significant improvement of quadratic deviation from the mean (Q.DEV), for Heart Average Dose (one‐tail p ‐value = 0.074) and for Contra‐Lung V3Gy (one‐tail p ‐value = 0.162) suggesting a trend in reduction of values dispersion hence a better planning homogeneity after CB introduction. 3.4.
weakly significantp = 0.0781.6× alphaqualifiedgold
The relationship in H3 between perceived ease of use (PEU) and attitude towards use (ATU) holds true for Generation Z, with a strongly significant path coefficient (0.298, p = 0.001); it is lower (0.229) and weakly significant (p = 0.078) for Generation Y and vanishes (0.067) for Generation X + (p = 0.541).
weakly significantp = 0.081.6× alphaqualifiedgold
Indeed, the analogous 39‐season correlation between anomalous monthly January d SHF d y ∼ 50 km at this location and the monthly January NAO index is negligible, but weakly significant 1 month later for the February NAO ( r = −0.28, p = 0.08).
Air-Sea Heat and Moisture Flux Gradients.
Geophys Res Lett · 2024 · PMC11578016