“weakly significant”

Surprisingly, there was a weakly significant correlation ( p = 0.081) between better pain relief in patients and hampered spread of contrast medium.

There were weakly significant treatment effects in CF-FACs for NAG ( P = 0.081) and XYL ( P = 0.078) and no effect for BG or CBH ( Fig. 2 ).

Outputs include weekly visits and multi‐disciplinary team reviews at 3, 6 and 9 months and the efficiency measures in Panel II show declines relative to caseload episodes with visits being weakly significant ( z = 1.385, p = 0.083).

The coefficient of DFI (0.093) is positive and weakly significant ( p = 0.084), implying a moderate short-term effect.

The increase in healthy life years was weakly significant at P = 0.084.

Notably, the annual trend in buildings exposed to destructive wildfires was positive (517 buildings/year) but only weakly significant ( P = 0.085; Table 1 ), as building exposure in 2003 and 2007 was comparable to more recent highly destructive years in 2017, 2018, and 2020 ( Fig. 1 B ).

The difference between the two data points just before and just after lunch is 11.0 percentages and it is weakly significant in a Chi‐squared test ( p = .087, n = 243).

For players with medium scores (2nd tertile), we find a positive yet weakly significant effect ( p = 0.087) which becomes amplified and highly significant for those player As whose Raven's test score belongs to the 3rd tertile of the experimental sample ( p = 0.012).

Spearman’s rank correlation supports this trend, showing a weakly significant relationship between average aPAR and JJA temperature ( p = 0.0875), and a more robust association for minimum aPAR ( p = 0.0123; S2).

The mean change was not significant from t 0 to t 1 (SMD = 0.108; CI [−0.163; 0.378]; p = 0.435), weakly significant in the comparison between the baseline and t 2 (SMD = 0.335; CI [−0.052; 0.723]; p = 0.089), and again not significant t 1 to t 2 (SMD = 0.025; CI [−0.365; 0.416]; p = 0.898).

Moreover, HIC displayed weakly significant differences between phenotypes p = .09 instead, with lower values found for HepGluc[+]. 3.3 Indicators of hepatic disease progression On the other hand, an analysis of several biochemical parameters was performed to compare both phenotypes, HepGluc[+] and HepGluc[−] (Table S1 ).

Overall, infection level had a weakly significant effect on the number of mosquitoes choosing to land on a frog (Two-Way ANOVA, F 3 = 2.4, P = 0.09).

However, in fitting a mixed-effects model to account for two-level clustering by root type and tooth, the effect of scan method was significant ( p < 0.0001), while root type was only weakly significant ( p = 0.09).

The mean value of Z tAI was weakly significant ( Fig. 1 ; t -test, P = 0.09), and was less than zero when miRNA target regions in genes with the bottom 5% ENC were separately considered.

The effect of time in relation to EphB4 expression was only weakly significant for untreated cells (p = 0.09) but was significant for EPA (p = 0.005) and AA (p = 0.009).

This association was particularly the case for older girls, although only remains weakly significant ( P = 0·09) for weight status after adjusting for physical activity.

Children of mothers with higher educational attainment had about 93% higher odds of being vaccinated compared to those whose mothers had no formal education; however, the result was weakly significant at 10% level (AOR = 1.93, 95%CI = 0.90 to 4.13, p = 0.09).

We also observe a weakly significant correlation between profit margin and R&D intensity ( ρ = 0.2309; p value = 0.09), and a significant positive correlation of cash flow with R&D intensity ( ρ = 0.2463; p value = 0.0017) suggestive of the importance of cash flow for R&D activity.

However, these differences are not significant in either treatment individually (Wilcoxon signed-ranks test, p > 0.20), and jointly the difference is only weakly significant (p ≈ 0.091).

Study 6 (Rand et al., 2012 ) As for the comparisons between the Intuition-Priming and the Reflection-Priming treatments to the baseline, the difference between the Benchmark and Intuition-Priming is significant for no sex ( p = 0.4879 for males, p = 0.4775 for females) and the difference between the Benchmark and the Reflection-Priming treatment is weakly significant for males ( p = 0.0922) but not for females ( p = 0.3806).

56 months, weakly significant with p = 0.0929).

Regarding beliefs about the probability of bribe acceptance, the lagged gap between the stated belief and the actual value ( p ) is only weakly significant in the Feedback specification ( p -value = 0.093).

However, we find weakly significant ( P = 0.096) that the respondents who did not complete the survey are more likely ND types.

The results show that the average trajectory length is higher in SZ (compared to HC), but the difference is weakly significant ( p = 0.096).

Although sex was a weakly significant factor, post hoc testing revealed no statistically significant differences between sexes within each genotype ( t tests with corrected p value, Ahl+ B6, p = 0.097; Ahl+ B6.CBA, p = 0.462; ahl B6; p = 0.53).