In the second model, the effect of FR had a positive but weakly significant effect ( ß = .213 p = .056; Table S2 ).
← all phrases
“weakly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.11
In the literature
In countries with higher trust, stricter containment measures were positively associated with birth rates, both for conceptions in the first year of the pandemic ( P = 0.019) and, albeit only weakly significant, for conceptions later in the pandemic ( P = 0.057).
In Côte d’Ivoire, temperature has a positive but weakly significant relationship with malaria prevalence ( β = 0.09376, p = 0.057669) and malaria incidence ( β = 0.04635, p = 0.088094).
The correlation is negative and weakly significant ( p = 0.058), because the relative whorl width unsurprisingly influences the relation between volume and conch diameter.
Indeed, the cross-state correlation between HLA susceptibility and ethnic diversity is positive and weakly significant (p = 0.059).
Plants with AMF access to the patch had marginally higher N:P ratios (total plant N content/total plant P content) than plants with no patch access although this was only weakly significant ( T 1,34 = 1.98, P = 0.060).
Despite the MSOM showing weakly significant pairwise co-occurrence ( α = 2.12 ± 1.11 SE , z = 1.90, P = 0.06; Table 3 ) between snow leopard and red fox, the results obtained from the predicted conditional occupancy of each species, based on the presence/absence of the interacting species, showed that the presence/absence of the red fox (i.e., first and second scenarios) did not affect the probability of occupancy of the snow leopard (red fox present: β = 0.47 ± 0.34 SE , CI95% = 1.74e−03 – 0.99; red fox absent: β = 0.46 ± 0.34 SE , CI95% = 2.78e−05 – 0.99) ( Supplementary Material 3 ).
However, correlation between nitrate and ( nirS + nirK )/( nosZ I + nosZ II ) was only weakly significant (p = 0.06) ( Table 3 ).
Despite only weakly significant, the number of seeds in scats increased with canopy cover in sacred grove (R 2 = 0.63, F 1,4 = 6.8, p = 0.06), but decreased with canopy cover in coffee plantation (R 2 = 0.33, F 1,8 = 3.9, p = 0.08).
A weakly significant species (within competition)× 15 N solution interaction for 15 N molar excess in shoot biomass ( F 2,34 = 3.0, P = 0.06) provided evidence that our plant species displayed different N uptake preferences, and that plant species preferences were modified by inter-specific competition.
The average T was slightly higher in the poorest performing data; however, it is important to note that the Student’s t test statistical p -value for this was only weakly significant ( p = 0.06).
l time - only 6% of patients with grade 3 and 4 were alive at 100 weeks following diagnosis compared to 89% of patients with grade 1 and 2 tumours. Sex of the astrocytoma patients, radiotherapy, chemotherapy or surgery did not significantly affect their survival (Table III), though surgery was weakly significant (P= 0.06).
Caregiver marital status was correlated with higher adherence, though this was only weakly significant ( p = 0.061).
It is noteworthy that the three significant miRNA ratios (miR-21/miR-183, miR-18a/miR-182 and miR-18a/miR-183) together with miR-21/miR-182 ratio, which appears weakly significant ( p = 0.063, Additional file 1 : Table S1), share a common characteristic.
Similarly, the estimator gives −0.07 as the coefficient estimate of GOEF, which is weakly significant ( P =0.063), suggesting again that improving government effectiveness has some rewards in terms of improvement in health status in the SSA region.
Briefly, analyses suggest a small, weakly significant bias toward lower scores during T‐COG validation visits for Animal Naming [full dataset β ^ = ‐0.99(CI:‐2.09, 0.056), p = 0.064, sensitivity dataset β ^ = ‐1.19 (CI:‐2.17, ‐0.22), p = 0.017].
Four of the six evolutionary transitions in aloes where succulence is severely reduced are associated with loss of medicinal use, providing weakly significant support for the hypothesis (pairwise comparison test: p = 0.065).
In a paired plot design, we found an overall yield reduction in five of six pairs warmed versus control plots, which was weakly significant ( P = 0.065; Fig. 1 L ).
The intervention resulted in a small but statistically significant effect in reducing the number of medicines (IRR 0.95, 95% CI 0.899–0.999, p = 0.045) and a weakly significant effect on potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIP) (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.140–1.064, p = 0.066).
Either in NOD2 positive and negative patients, the frequency of smokers and non-smokers was weakly significant (P = 0.067) (data not shown).
Differences between the seronegation rates according to age were statistically weakly significant (P = 0.0671).
However, the degree of verbal radicalization is marginal (β = 0.0005) and only weakly significant (p = 0.0687) as the coefficients in Table 5 show.
Figure 2 also shows that the negative epistemic trust → perceived risks link was significant (β = −0.364, p < 0.001) and the positive epistemic trust → perceived benefits link was weakly significant (β = 0.067, p =0.069), but it was only significant at p = 0.10, hence, supporting Hypotheses 9 and 10.
On the other hand we observed a weakly significant correlation at T0 between sCD14 and D-dimer (p = 0.069) that persisted to T1 (CC: -0.484, p = 0.030).
We see a weakly significant correlation between the distribution of these HGT events along the phylogeny of Methanococcales and OGT ( r 2 = −0.31, P value = 0.07) or OGT variations ( r 2 = 0.34, P value = 0.048).