An insignificant group-by-time interaction effect, very close to significance, was observed in the letter cancellation subtest of the BIT, when comparing participants in the MVF group with those in sham 2 (Δβ = 3.93, p = 0.056).
It should be noted that in our report, we applied two-tailed statistics; as the comparisons were made following specific predictions, one-tailed statistics for Rank 1 animals in those results give trends very close to significance (i.e., p<0.056, P<0.075, p<0.08; p<0.05; p<0.1; p<0.12; p<0.056; p<0.056) while they are clearly not significant for Rank 4 mice, further supporting the reported results.
JND and PD The comparison between patients in ON MED and the controls showed a different picture: No difference between the groups was found, although the results came very close to significance ( * p = 0.0565, n = 40).
In this group, the mean concentration of 16α-OHE was very close to significance ( P = 0.057), and the mean ratio change was not significant.
The second passage of MPs through the digestive tract of the crayfish also resulted in a significant reduction in MPs volume compared to control 2 only (planned contrast; p = 0.006; Table S2 ; Figure 2 ), although the difference for control 1 was very close to significance (planned contrast; p = 0.057; Table S2 ; Figure 2 ).
As for clinical fractures, the comparison was very close to significance ( p =.057), in fact, in the cohort of patients with osteoporosis and degraded TBS, 9 patients had clinical fractures (29.0%), while those with osteoporosis and non-degraded TBS had a smaller number of clinical fractures ( N = 4; 10.8%).
Although in contrast to the Univariate models, EORTC is very close to significance ( p = 0.058, HR 1.11, CI 0.996–1.241) when taken together with NLR2.5 ( p = 0.012, HR 2.098, CI 1.174–3.75).
Although the influence was not significant and probability was very close to significance ( p = 0.058, partial eta squared = 0.03), we found that transferrin saturation in females with risk A allele was higher than in females who were homozygotes G/G, but probability was close to significant ( p = 0.063). 4.
In addition to that, the diurnal variation difference of FEV 1 and FEV 3 in different age-groups was very close to significance ( P = 0.058 for FEV 1 and = 0.053 for FEV 3 ), indicating diurnal variation of these two variables increased with age, especially for the 45- to 60-year population.
The only two variables that demonstrated sex-specific differences were ABS (χ 2 = 3.83, p = 0.050) and SMM, where the difference was very close to significance (χ 2 = 3.59, p = 0.058) ( Table 3 ).
However, such a difference was very close to significance also in the ET [ t (22) = −2.65, p = 0.059, d = −0.53], and the Bayes factor value (BF 10 = 3.6) provided moderate support to the alternative hypothesis.
On the other hand, and very close to significance (p = 0.059), was the association between a worse prior functional status and increased mortality.
Notably, the difference in AT1 receptor mRNA expression level between the early-onset and late-onset pre-eclamptic groups showed a p -value very close to significance ( p = 0.0592 fold).
Although mean baseline BCVA levels of the two groups did not show statistically significance, the p value was very close to significance (p = 0.06) and the mean baseline BCVA was arithmetically lower in poor responder group which might be created a bias for the study design.
Two more upregulated proteins involved in lipid storage, SYAP1 and RAB18, were very close to significance ( p < 0.06).
Grasp peak velocity of finger aperture was very close to significance ( p = 0.06).
= 0.2, z = 2.9, p = 0.004), and very close to significance in the high-frequency condition ( β = 0.37, s.e. = 0.2, z = 1.85, p = 0.06). 4 However, it is also considerably worse than the recognition memory task, which indicates that word forms were learned much better than the meaning of their stems.
POAG cases and controls exhibited significant differences in genotypic distributions according to the additive (p = 0.01, χ2 = 5.49) and recessive models (p = 0.02, χ2 = 4.97), however the p value obtained from dominant model was also very close to significance (p = 0.06, χ2 = 3.44).
Following Spearman’s method, an inverse correlation (R = −0.39) between the 60 lncRNAs and the 24 coding genes was observed in the MDD group, which was very close to significance (p = 0.06) (Fig. 5E ).
Significant effects of trial (F = 7.08, p < 0.05), time (F = 8.03, p < 0.001), and a very close to significance trial × time interaction (F = 3.09, p = 0.06) on TBARS levels were revealed by three-way ANOVA.
The primary school source was not a significant predictor in any model, although the high school source was very close to significance ( p = 0.06).
This analysis pinpointed a 500 kb window containing five genes ( GFPT1 , HIRIP5 , AAK1 , ANXA4 , GMCL1 ) that were deregulated with a p -value very close to significance ( p = 0.06) ( Fig 4A ).
Poverty threshold was very close to significance ( p = 0.06) in the final model.
In addition, when the models were adjusted for each of the traditional cardiovascular risk factors not influenced by treatment (age, ethnicity, smoking and diabetes) instead of the Framingham score, and also for the antiretroviral regimen composition (protease inhibitors vs non nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors), high seropositivity for varicella-zoster virus remained associated with carotid atherosclerosis (OR [95% CI] 5.27 [1.55–17.95], P = 0.008), and high seropositivity for cytomegalovirus was very close to significance (OR [95% CI] 3.27 [0.95–11.20], P = 0.06).
However, the LFR results analyzed returned a probability value very close to significance ( p = 0.0606).