Barely Significant
← all phrases

“very close to significance”

192 sentences · 192 papers · 228 search hits before verification

In the literature

very close to significancep = 0.06191.2× alpha
Statistically significant adverse effects on body weight were demonstrated for cisplatin treatment compared to the vehicle from Day 4 post-treatment to Day 13 (d4: p = 0.0006; d5: p = 0.0009; d8: p = 0.0012: d9: p < 0.0001; d10: p = 0.0002; d11–d13: p < 0.0001), except on Days 6 and 7 with results very close to significance ( p = 0.0619 and p = 0.0774, respectively) ( Supplementary Table S1 ).
very close to significancep = 0.0621.2× alpha
Moreover, Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that high RPMBs could significantly predict poor DFS in male patients after R0 resection for N1 disease (HR: 5.431, 95% CI: 1.045–28.219, p = 0.024), and the p -value was very close to significance in these patients after adjuvant RAI therapy (HR: 6.269, 95% CI: 0.693–56.714, p = 0.062).
very close to significancep = 0.0691.4× alpha
About promotion of colon carcinogenesis in the rat model, we noted that compared to the cooked ham model produced with 120 mg/kg of sodium nitrite (Ni-120), the reduction of sodium nitrite to 90 mg/kg (Ni-90) induced a reduction in the number of the preneoplastic lesions MDF (mucin depleted foci) per colon, while the removal (Ni-0) induced an effect very close to significance ( p = 0.069) (Fig. 4A ).
very close to significancep = 0.0761.5× alpha
While this was very exciting, we have not found any association with depression risk, although suicide ideation was very close to significance in the multivariate model (variant genotypes β: +0.45, p = 0.076; Table 2 ), and it showed a p < 0.05 regarding the number of suicide attempts (AA carriers with almost double the suicide attempts; Figure S2R ).
very close to significancep < .102.0× alpha
Very close to significance (p < .10) with a moderate effect (R2 = 0.050) was the absolute preference variable of the less attractive woman, which can be explained by a greater tendency of Facebook users towards the retrusive profile (76% vs. 54.7%). - SnapChat®: Statistical significance (p < .05) with a moderate effect (R 2 = 0.042) was found in the relative preference for the female silhouette, which is due to the greater choice of users of this network for the protrusive profile (81.1%).