“very close to significance”

3 , the effects of this region were also very close to significance for the 0/1/2 phenotype in the same breed (−log 10 ( P ) = 5.99).

The association of this SNP with PDR was very close to significance ( p = 0.007) and the SNP also reached nominal significance with DME ( p = 0.038).

The ANOVA also uncovered a main effect for instructions on all temporal variables (RT, vel x and vel y ), except for MD-time (although the p value was very close to significance, p = 0.019).

Turning to Training Mode and Monolingual/Bilingual, the Training Mode and Monolingual/Bilingual interaction, and the Training Mode × Monolingual/Bilingual × ao/av interaction were both very close to significance Training Mode × Monolingual/Bilingual, F (1, 65) = 3.91, p > 0.05, ηp 2 = 0.057; Training Mode × Monolingual/Bilingual × ao/av tests, F = 3.76, p>0.05, ηp 2 = 0.055 (critical F = 3.98).

However, there was an effect of attachment on the number of first pass regressions made out of the post-target region reliable by participants and very close to significance by items F 1(1, 52) = 7.22, p <.05, η 2 = .12; F 2(1, 15) = 4.10, p = .06, η 2 = .21.

The model resulted in R 2 =0.602, and the model was very close to significance at the 5% significance level ( P =.05).

In addition, a negative correlation, very close to significance, was found between the Second-order false-belief task and Visual perspective-taking mistakes ( r = −.413; p = .050).

When the control group alone was assessed this relationship was very close to significance: r=-0.36, p=0.05.

The differences between concordance and discordance in the group with 4 or fewer endoscopic biopsies and the group with 5 or more endoscopic biopsies are very close to significance ( P = 0.05), and these values are in line with those obtained with virtual biopsies.

This model included the effect of PA on BD, which demonstrated a standardized coefficient very close to significance, but without reaching it ( β = −0.10, p = 0.05).

Complications were significant in the transfused Group II (P = .007), very close to significance for the Age group ≥30 years (P=.05), and close to significance for the number of crises, but insignificant for preoperative Hb-S, mean preoperative hemoglobin, and the operative time.

In fact, the effect of iReadMore on semantic matching was very close to significance ( P = 0.050).

There was also a difference between standard deviations that trended very close to significance (male faces, M = 2.324; 95% CI = [2.212, 2.448]; female faces, M = 2.484; 95% CI = [2.339, 2.646], p = 0.0508).

Noteworthy, the correlation between γ-GT and UREA, AST and BHBa (the latter very close to significance, p = 0.051) points to a certain involvement of liver function.

However, the univariate analysis showed an effect very close to significance in the case of e-victimization (EVPA1), F (1, 110) = 1.87, p = .051, η 2 = .03 (see Table 3 ).

In the multivariable model that included glucose instead of DM or abnormal fasting glucose, the difference was very close to significance ( p = 0.051).

From this aspect, although seminal vesicle invasion is also very close to significance limit, prediction value has not been deemed adequate ( P = 0.051).

Statistical analysis indicates that the reduction in bilateral posterior discharges between the group of 3 to ≤6 years and that of 6 to ≤10 is very close to significance ( p = 0.051, binomial statistics) and the comparison between cases of 3 to ≤6 years and the group with the oldest cases is statistically significant ( p = 0.028, binomial statistics).

In particular, we re-estimated the specifications in Table 1 for the restricted sample and found that, in all specifications, the coefficient of interest remains statistically significantly negative [the only exception being the specifications underlying column 1 in which the coefficient is very close to significance ( p = 0.051)].

However, SE3 (“I put the same amount of effort into the inspection as if I had worked on it alone.”) was very close to significance, H(2) = 2.67, p = 0.051.

In a phase 3 study with intraregional injection of T-VEC compared to GM-CSF alone, there was an increase in median OS from 18.9 to 23.3 months with a P -value very close to significance ( P =0.051).

In the case of EP risk, the interaction term was very close to significance ( P = .051, Table 4 ).

In contrast, constant darkness (107 ± 12) and melatonin (285 ± 65) caused an insignificant reduction in total Olig2+ oligodendroglia compared to that in the vehicle group (367 ± 105), and the difference induced by constant darkness was very close to significance ( p = 0.051).

The Shapiro–Wilk test for normality on the variable “mass gain” was very close to significance as well ( p = 0.051).

However, in the EGL we were unable to find a suitable model for reln +∕+ mice, although linear regression yielded statistic data very close to significance (adjusted R 2 = 0.91; P = 0.051).