“tendency towards significance”

While there were no significant differences in these parameters between the ER and NP groups, the placental major and minor axes showed a tendency towards significance ( p = 0.092 and 0.074, respectively).

However, the result using this model indicated that the effect of age was no longer statistically significant, but there was a tendency towards significance (parameter estimate − 0.158, p = 0.093).

However, none of the three measures were significantly different (unpaired t-test), though there was a tendency towards significance (t 11 = 1.837, p = 0.0933) in the CPP– Δ pre-test CPP measure.

Interestingly, the reduction in IL-10 showed a tendency towards significance in the B12-supplemented mothers ( p = 0.096).

With respect to the changes of miRNAs we also report on results with a tendency towards significance, i.e. p < 0.10.

Significance would be considered when p < 0.05, while a tendency towards significance was considered when 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10.

For subscale 1 the test for departure from normal distribution shows a tendency towards significance (Lilliefors-p < .10).

The ANOVA for the response surfaces of Table 2 identified that the linear models were significant for fucose ( p < 0.05) and showed a tendency towards significance for FRAP response ( p < 0.1).

Note that almost all classifications were significantly better than chance (above 50%, p < 0.05), with two having a tendency towards significance ( p < 0.1).

‘Hearing’ showed only a tendency towards significance (χ 2 =4.61, P =0.10). ‘Swaying or falling’ (χ 2 =8.20, P =0.0042), ‘smell’ (χ 2 =6.20, P =0.0451) and ‘tremor’ (χ 2 =4.40, P =0.0359), were also significantly associated with CCD in the Paper survey, and ‘vision’ (χ 2 =5.73, P =0.057) and ‘age’ (χ 2 =3.13, P =0.0769) showed a tendency towards significance. ‘Head ptosis’ was not associated with CCD in the Paper survey.

A shorter salting duration resulted in a lower salt content in both the SM and BF, with the reduction being statistically significant ( p < 0.05) in L hams, and a tendency towards significance ( p < 0.10) in H hams.

Differences between means were considered statistically significant when the P-value was < 0.05 and were considered to show a tendency towards significance with 0.05 < P < 0.10.

Significance level was set at P < 0.05 and tendency towards significance at 0.05 < P < 0.10.

Statistical significance was determined at ( p ≤ 0.05) and a tendency towards significance at (0.05 ≤ p ≥ 0.10).

Any factor with a tendency towards significance ( p ≤ 0.1) was included in a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model.

All relevant variables being significant (p < 0.05) or showing a strong tendency towards significance (p < 0.1) in the univariate analysis were included in a multivariate logistic model and plotted as receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to illustrate the predicted relevance.

A probability of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, P < 0.01 was described as extremely significant, and 0.05 < P < 0.10 was defined as a tendency towards significance.

The factor that showed a tendency towards significance (at p<0.1) was ‘source of water’.

Finally, the overall MC of the German children is also primarily determined by the PA executed in the club sport setting ( Beta = 0.26, p < 0.01), but the outside play activities show at least a tendency towards significance ( Beta = 0.13, p < 0.10).

Effects were considered significant when P ≤ 0.05 and tendency towards significance at 0.05 < P < 0.10.

A tendency towards significance was also found for some of the doses used in H358 (Ctrl vs. 2·IC 50 ; p = 0.1) and H23 (Ctrl vs.

Significance level was set at P < 0.05 and tendency towards significance at 0.05 < P < 0.10.

However, one mRNA only showed a tendency towards significance (HERC6: p < 0.1) by the method of qPCR while one lncRNA (rXLOC_022071) was significantly DE by RNA-Seq but not by qPCR, although the fold change by both methods was the same (4.1-fold change, Supplementary Table S8b ).

Differences between means were considered statistically significant when the P -value was < 0.05 and were considered to show a tendency towards significance with 0.05 < P < 0.1.

Significance was noted at P ≤ 0.05, and a tendency towards significance was noted at P ≤ 0.10.