Barely Significant
← all phrases

“tendency towards significance”

350 sentences · 350 papers · 409 search hits before verification

In the literature

tendency towards significancep = 0.0821.6× alpha
3.4 Seeking a candidate biomarker for suicide: Suicidal versus non‐suicidal group No significant differences were found regarding psychological variables (Tables 2 , 3 and S1), except for a tendency towards significance for the hopelessness scale (BHS) ( p = 0.082, Table 2 ) and the personality subfacets anhedonia, impulsivity and risk‐taking of the PID‐5 ( p = 0.062; p = 0.068; p = 0.079, Table S1), which resulted increased in the suicidal group.
Poor prognosis of patients with HCC with high expression of TEAD2 and VGLL4 Based on the log-rank test and TCGA database, abundant mRNA expression of TEAD2 [hazard ratio (HR), 1.61; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.14–2.27; P=0.0067] was significantly associated with a poor OS rate in patients with HCC, and there was a tendency towards significance between TEAD4 (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.95–1.91; P=0.085) and VGLL4 mRNA expression (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1–2.02; P=0.051), and a poor prognosis ( Fig. 2 ).
tendency towards significancep value = 0.091.8× alpha
Figure 4B shows the results of the meta-analysis of severe nephritis in patients from the 5 cohorts classified according to our model, in which we obtained a combined probability of 1.5 times higher risk with a tendency towards significance (p value = 0.09) of manifesting nephritis in the neutrophil-driven subgroup with respect to the lymphocyte-driven subgroup.
A significant difference between HF-AD and HF-AM were detected for triglycerides (TG, p = 0.046) and total cholesterol (TC, p = 0.048), and tendency towards significance was observed for total fatty acids (TFA, p = 0.09), saturated fatty acids (SFA, p = 0.07), and monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA, p = 0.09).
There was a significantly greater average loss of FM in the INT compared with CON group for those who completed the intervention, those who completed the intervention per protocol , and those who were available for follow-up ( P <0.01 for each analysis), and a tendency towards significance in the ITT analysis ( P =0.09; Table 2 ).