Barely Significant
← all phrases

“showed a trend”

53,323 sentences · 53,323 papers · 65,371 search hits before verification

In the literature

showed a trendp = 0.0511.0× alpha
Interestingly, CRTC1 mRNA expression showed a trend to be inversely correlated with Prom1 methylation levels (r Spearman = −0.949, p = 0.051) in the control group; meanwhile, no significant correlation was found between methylation and expression among AD patients (r Spearman = −0.287, p = 0.490). mRNA levels of CRTC1 downstream target genes are altered in Alzheimer’s disease hippocampus We also wanted to test whether CRTC1 -dependent genes were also dysregulated in our set of AD hippocampal samples.
showed a trendp = 0.0511.0× alpha
The overall improvement of ODI and SRS-30 compared to baseline was similar in both groups (all p > 0.05), however the ERF group showed a trend toward lower improvement of ODI at 1-year postoperatively (17.3 vs 24.6, p = 0.051).
Oral Presentations
Global Spine Journal · 2018 · PMC6152593
showed a trendp = 0.0511.0× alpha
For tumor size, pT2 compared with pT1 showed a significant association (hazard ratio 2.39, 95% CI 1.15–13.0, p = 0.028), while pT3 compared with pT1 showed a trend toward an association (hazard ratio 2.45, 95% CI 1.00–13.6, p = 0.051).
showed a trendp = 0.0511.0× alpha
Under control conditions (1000 s stimulation pause), waveforms in CA3a showed a trend towards increased diversity over time (median distances late/early recording period 1.08, p = 0.051, n = 11 data sets from 6 slices), which reached significance in CA3b (median 1.14, p = 0.016, n = 17 data sets from 9 slices).
borderline significancep = 0.0511.0× alpha
showed a trendp = 0.0731.5× alpha
For the traditional section, however, the only significant predictors were prior GPA and ethnicity (note type was not analyzed for this section), although class standing showed a trend ( p = 0.073), and major had borderline significance ( p = 0.051).
showed a trendp = .0511.0× alpha
Moreover, the proportion of detected spines in MEC with filopodial morphology was negatively correlated with SD interventions required ( Figure 3 , bottom; Pearson’s r = −0.94, p < .05), while the proportion with stubby morphology showed a trend for positive correlation with SD interventions (Pearson’s r = 0.88, p = .051).