Barely Significant
← all phrases

“showed a trend”

53,323 sentences · 53,323 papers · 65,371 search hits before verification

In the literature

showed a trendp = 0.132.6× alpha
In a comparison of facilities treating > 100 patients and facilities treating ≤ 50 patients per year, centers with many patients showed a trend for increased rates of using SRT for up to 10 BM (43 % vs. 19 %; p = 0.13), while HS-WBRT and memantine were equally frequently applied ( Fig. 4 b).
showed a trendp = 0.132.6× alpha
Excluding the 8 infants who were studied at both time points, HEU infants showed a trend toward higher NK cell proportions at 6 months compared to birth (increase from median of 1.85% at birth to 3.12% at 6 months; p = 0.13), whereas HUU infants had lower NK cell proportions at 6 months compared to birth (decrease from 9.4% at birth to 4.65% at 6 months; p < 0.0001).
showed a trendP = 0.132.6× alpha
Similarly, in the second revision of the international staging system (R2-ISS) which utilized 15 pooled clinical trials for model building, while t(14;16) showed a trend towards a shorter PFS, it was not statistically significant (HR 1.15 [95% CI, 0.96 to 1.37], P = 0.13) which could have potentially been impacted by the heterogeneity of the dataset and the therapies received [ 12 ].
showed a trendP = 0.132.6× alpha
To this end, OS cells were shown to express several components of the WNT signaling pathway and the chemotactic response to exogenous WNT was increased in a mouse metastatic OS cell line compared to the parental cells with low metastatic potential, and increased WNT10B expression showed a trend (n = 44; P = 0.13) to shorter survival in patients [ 45 , 46 ].
showed a trendp = 0.1312.6× alpha
Although non-significant (NS), patients with incongruent results (one low/one high, n = 10) showed a trend of having a favorable prognosis compared to patients with high results from both modalities (log-rank p = 0.131), but inferior compared to patients with low uPAR-estimates on both modalities (p = 0.136).
showed a trendp = 0.1322.6× alpha
The AE37 arm had no difference in DFS as compared to CG, but pre-specified exploratory subgroup analyses showed a trend towards benefit in advanced stage ( p = 0.132, HR 0.573 CI 0.275–1.193), HER2 under-expression ( p = 0.181, HR 0.756 CI 0.499–1.145), and triple-negative breast cancer ( p = 0.266, HR 0.443 CI 0.114–1.717).
showed a trendp = 0.1322.6× alpha
In a different randomized trial in the adjuvant setting, AE37 and GP2, two other HER2 derived peptide vaccines were investigated in a four-arm, prospective, randomized, single-blinded, multi-center phase II trial; the AE37 arm showed no difference in DFS overall; however, subgroup analyses showed a trend towards benefit in advanced stage ( p = 0.132, HR 0.573 CI 0.275–1.193), HER2 under-expression ( p = 0.181, HR 0.756 CI 0.499–1.145), and triple-negative breast cancer ( p = 0.266, HR 0.443 CI 0.114–1.717).