Barely Significant
← all phrases

“showed a trend”

53,323 sentences · 53,323 papers · 65,371 search hits before verification

In the literature

showed a trendp = 0.1132.3× alpha
Dose–response analysis further showed ( Table 3 , Figure 5a ): nadolol and propranolol showed a non-significant trend of risk reduction with increasing dose (nadolol: β = −0.00783, p = 0.422, R 2 = 0.133; propranolol: β = −0.00363, p = 0.397, R 2 = 0.104); Atenolol showed a trend of risk increase with increasing dose ( β = 0.01530, p = 0.113, R 2 = 0.622), though not statistically significant; metoprolol had no obvious dose–effect relationship ( β = −0.00049, p = 0.892, R 2 = 0.005).
showed a trendP = 0.1132.3× alpha
Although KRAS mutation–positive patients showed a trend toward a shorter survival compared with those negative for KRAS and EGFR mutations as well as for fusion genes (9.99 vs. 12.9 months, P = 0.113) ( Supplementary Figure S2 ), the negative prognostic value of KRAS mutations remains uncertain on the basis of the data in the present study.
showed a trendp=0.11362.3× alpha
Notably, high IL1RAP expression on tumor cells and stroma combined, was associated with a significantly increased progression-free survival (median: 3.5 vs 1.2 months, p=0.0023) and showed a trend toward extended overall survival (median: 5.0 vs 2.2 months, p=0.1136) with a follow-up of 11.5 months ( figure 7B ).
showed a trendP = 0.1142.3× alpha
In the population aged < 65 years, patients in the E + dCRT group also showed a trend of better 3-year PFS rate (54.29% [95% CI 36.61–68.98] vs. 33.33% [95% CI 13.65–54.54]; HR for disease progression, 0.58; 95% CI 0.27–1.22; P = 0.114) and 3-year OS rate (80.00% [95% CI 62.58–89.92] vs. 55.56% [95% CI 30.51–74.75]; HR for death, 0.54; 95% CI 0.23–1.23; P = 0.102) compared to those in the dCRT group (Fig. 3 E and F).
showed a trendp = 0.1142.3× alpha
However, TNBC patients with high EVI1 showed a trend towards increased pCR rates compared to low group (37.7% vs 27.5%, p = 0.114; odds ratio 1.60 (95%CI 0.90–2.85, p = 0.110) and numerically better DFS (HR = 0.77 [95%CI 0.48–1.23], log-rank p = 0.271) and OS (HR = 0.76 [95% 0.44–1.31], log-rank p = 0.314) without reaching statistical significance.