Barely Significant
← all phrases

“showed a trend”

53,323 sentences · 53,323 papers · 65,371 search hits before verification

In the literature

showed a trendp = 0.081.6× alpha
A GLMM on the summed number of manually counted steps with the same 18 hens excluded (fixed effect of the rearing treatment, IDs of birds nested within pen, and pen nested with rearing treatment and ranging as the random effects) showed a trend for significance (F 2, 7 . 83 = 3.60, p = 0.08), where the post-hoc tests showed the novelty hens stepped more than the control hens. 3.1.5.
showed a trendp = 0.081.6× alpha
Moreover, low tidal volume ventilation increased the levels of glutamate ( p < 0.01), glycerol ( p < 0.05) and showed a trend towards higher lactate to pyruvate ratio ( p = 0.08) in cerebral microdialysate as well as higher levels of S-100B ( p < 0.05) in jugular venous plasma compared with medium–high tidal volume ventilation.
showed a trendp = 0.081.6× alpha
In addition, RIC showed a trend to reduce aGVHD ( Figure 4B ) and III–IV aGVHD ( Supplement 4 ) compared with TBI/Bu-based MAC (HR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.60–1.03, p = 0.08) (RR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.36–1.04, p = 0.07) and with no significant ( p = 0.15 and p = 0.19) heterogeneity ( I 2 = 43% and I 2 = 39%), respectively.
showed a trendp = 0.081.6× alpha
As reported in the REGOMA trial, the subgroup of patients taking steroids at baseline showed a trend for a shorter survival compared to patients without steroid treatment, despite it not being statistically significant ( p = 0.08); indeed, the hazard ratio for patients receiving regorafenib and steroid was 0.75 versus 0.34 for patients treated with regorafenib alone.
showed a trendp = 0.0801.6× alpha
In the righting reflex test, the two-way repeated-measures ANOVA showed a trend toward an effect of picrotoxin treatment [ F (1, 42) = 3.216, p = 0.080], no picrotoxin treatment × day of testing interaction [ F (2, 84) = 1.415, p = 0.249; n = 18 control mice, n = 26 picrotoxin-exposed mice; Figure 2B ], and a significant effect of day of testing [ F (1.424, 59.80) = 39.04, p < 0.0001].
showed a trendp = 0.081.6× alpha
Variables that reached significance for RI were stage at HAPLO-SCT2 ( p = 0.003) and interval from HAPLO-SCT1 to relapse ( p = 0.008), while MAC showed a trend towards lower RI as compared to RIC ( p = 0.08).
showed a trendp = 0.081.6× alpha
While the total effect of family adversity and the direct effect of negative parenting practices on child ADHD symptoms showed a trend for significance (FAI: p = 0.08; nPAR: p = 0.07), the direct effect of positive parenting practices did not.
showed a trendp = 0.081.6× alpha
In addition, the cCR rate in the SCRT group was 25% (95% CI: 0.18–0.33, p < 0.001), compared to only 15% (95% CI: 0.07–0.24, p < 0.001) in the LCRT group; although the difference did not reach conventional statistical significance, it showed a trend ( p = 0.08) (Fig. 4 c).