Barely Significant
← all phrases

“showed a trend”

53,323 sentences · 53,323 papers · 65,371 search hits before verification

In the literature

showed a trendp = 0.020.4× alpha
Similar results were obtained when analyzing the NTs in the EC of Cohort II; the co-localization between p-tau217/p-tau231 and p-tau231/p-tau205 was significantly lower, and p-tau217/p-tau205 showed a trend to lower co-localization in AD high compared to PART ( p = 0.02, p = 0.04, and p = 0.06, respectively).
showed a trendp = 0.0210.4× alpha
The non-randomized DAART trial (directional atherectomy and anti-restenotic therapy vs drug-coated balloon alone in the popliteal) showed a trend towards increased 12 month primary patency (82% versus 65%, p = 0.021) for the DAART arm (Stavroulakis et al., 2017 ), however aneurysmal dilatation was seen more often after DAART (although this was not statistically significant).
showed a trendP = 0.0210.4× alpha
Consistent with its link to proliferative activity, survival analysis in our institutional TMA cohort showed a trend toward shorter overall survival with increasing KIFC1 expression ( P = 0.021, log-rank test for trend; P = 0.053 for high vs. low groups; Supplemental Figure 4 ), suggesting that elevated KIFC1 expression may be associated with poor prognosis in SCLC.
showed a trendp = 0.0210.4× alpha
Bipolar disorder polygenic risk score, childhood adversity and symptom dimensions BD-PRS showed a trend-level association with the positive dimension (β = −0.49, 95% CI = [−0.875, −0.102], p = 0.021) but no association with the negative (β = 0.09, 95% CI = [−0.288, 0.474], p = 0.654), manic (β = −0.19, 95% CI = [−0.582, 0.208], p = 0.387) or depressive dimensions (β = −0.20, 95% CI = [−0.585, 0.178], p = 0.330).
showed a trendp =0.02120.4× alpha
All other investigated associations were not significant (for Ratingen Score, the 0–48-month change showed a trend toward more radiological deterioration in A-patients than in C-patients [ p =0.0212], which did not fulfill the predefined significance criterion of 0.0167 for this comparison, cf the “Patients and methods” section for details).
showed a trendp = 0.0220.4× alpha
a marginal trendp = 0.0761.5× alphagold
ACWR TD W3 showed a trend toward an association with injury risk (χ 2 (1) = 5.24, p = 0.022; R 2 McF = 0.094; AUC = 0.675; OR = 236.33, 95% CI [0.91, 61,385.02], p = 0.054), while ACWR TD W4 also demonstrated a marginal trend ( p = 0.076; AUC = 0.665).