Barely Significant
← all phrases

“showed a trend”

53,323 sentences · 53,323 papers · 65,371 search hits before verification

In the literature

showed a trendp = 0.061.2× alpha
Multivariable-adjusted analyses In analyses adjusted for 15-additional variables including preoperative limitations in 7 ADLs, compared to patients with loosening/wear/osteolysis, patients with dislocation/fracture/instability/non-union had significantly higher odds (2.2-times; p = 0.002) of moderate-severe ADL limitation at 2-years post-revision THA (Table 3 ); those with failed prior arthroplasty/infection showed a trend towards significance with odds ratio of 1.6 (p = 0.06).
showed a trendp = 0.061.2× alpha
Similar to the trend we observed in tumor-derived SUV max , SUV max in post-surgical scarring also showed a trend towards a positive correlation with myocardial tracer uptake (Pearson’s r = 0.49, p = 0.06) Otherwise, there were no significant correlations between radiotracer uptake in normal organs and post-surgical scarring ( Table S2 ). 3.5.
showed a trendp = 0.061.2× alpha
The ENGENE-PSP study, the largest case-control study of PSP, assigned chemical exposure showed a trend of increased odds (OR = 1.20; 95% CI = 0.99–1.45; p = 0.06), and assigned metal exposure had a trend of increased odds (OR = 1.30; 95% CI = 1.00–1.70; p = 0.05) in the univariate analysis.
showed a trendP = 0.061.2× alpha
Results A mixed-design ANOVA with ‘familiarity’ (self, partner, familiar person, and unfamiliar person) as within-subject factor,’ treatment’ (OXT, PLC) and AQ (low autistic-like traits, high autistic-like traits) as between-subject variables, and the relative total gaze time toward the eye region as dependent variable showed a trend significant effect of treatment ( F (1, 63) = 3.58, P = 0.06,η 2 = 0.05; Figure 3A ) and a main effect of AQ ( F (1, 63) = 4.90, P = 0.03,η 2 = 0.07; Figure 3B ).
showed a trendp = 0.061.2× alpha
In the probe trial, Zbtb20 +/– mice showed a trend ( p = 0.06) toward favoring the target quadrant slightly less than WT mice ( Fig. 8 C ), but no significant differences were found between the groups during this component of the test in target preference index or mean proximity to the original platform location ( Fig. 8 D , E ).