“reached near significance”

Association of SNPs rs10485170 of CNR1 and rs5215 of KCNJ11 with adiponectin and leptin, respectively, reached near significance ( p = 0.002).

These are likely driven by the direct effects of victimisation which reached near significance (ADE = − 0.74, p = 0.05).

Based on the small numbers analyzed at this time point, this reached near significance (10.6 ± 3.3% male 1 day post-injury vs. −0.02 ± 0.5% sham, p = 0.05 and 9.5 ± 5.2% female 1 day post-injury vs. −0.0.02 ± 0.5% sham, p = 0.08).

Overall, there was not a main effect of group, F( 1, 31) = 0.60, p = 0.71, however the effect of education reached near significance, F (1, 31) = 2.60, p = 0.05.

Lifts in the light condition took 17.80% less time to complete ( Table 2 ); however, this only reached near significance ( p = 0.051; ES 0.94).

Volunteers tended to have reduced hunger ratings after dancing, singing and cycling (Figure 2 ), but this only reached near significance for the question “how hungry do you feel?” immediate post-cycling ( t (7) = 2.348, P = 0.0512, Figure 2D ).

CD24 was also positively correlated with ITGA2 in the ED03 series ( R 2 = 0.84, p = 0.0035) and this reached near significance in the EDW01 series ( R 2 = 0.76, p = 0.054) (Fig. 6 c).

In this group, the RRFS reached near significance ( p = 0.055) for END, when compared to WW.

The total number of nuclei in OCs reached near significance ( p = 0.0550) when compared to the donor age ( Figure 2 c).

Multivariable Cox regression showed that favipiravir was significantly (p = 0.026) associated with faster viral clearance, additionally the timing of antiviral therapy reached near significance (p = 0.055).

Additionally, the timing of the antiviral therapy reached near significance (p=0.055). 19 Furthermore, it was superior to Arbidol in having a higher 7-day clinical recovery rate in patients with COVID-19 and a more significant reduction in fever and cough. 15 A Japanese observational study assessed the safety and efficacy of favipiravir.

ATM-Chk2 coexpression showed a trend and reached near significance ( P = .056).

The difference between IUC and IT (1.75 vs 1.0) reached near significance (p = 0.056) on day 7 post‐infection.

When adjusted for sex and diabetes duration, AGRP reached near significance after adjustment for FDR ( P = 0.057, β = 0.79).

In the previous study period, this reached near significance ( p = 0.059); however, in the current study period, this was no longer observed ( p = 0.123). 3.1.2.

However, the total numbers of splenic CD8 + T cells trended lower in infected female mice that reached near significance (p = 0.0599) ( Fig 8B ).

Two measures reached near significance: SQS ( p ≤ .060) and PHQ9 ( p ≤ .078).

Notably, the between-group difference reached near significance ( p = 0.06; Figure 10 ), suggesting that a dose-related trend may exist but remains uncertain.

Paired samples t -tests indicated that K’ values were significantly improved in the SAT ( t = 3.73, df = 9, p < .01,) group post-training, an effect that reached near significance in the WMT ( t = 2.11, df = 9, p = .06,) group, but was absent in the WL ( t = 0.06, df = 9, p = .95,).

Employment status reached near significance ( P =.06).

No other variables suggested correlation with one another, although PU and ITU reached near significance (p = 0.06) with a positive correlation.

There was no significant difference in the venous branching angle ( p = 0.98) or arterial VTI ( p = 0.53) across levels of CDR, whereas the arterial branching angle reached near significance ( p = 0.066; Figure 1 F).

This trend reached near significance ( P = 0.07, exact Wilcoxon test) in groups administered with CH505 sequential gp120 Envs when they were formulated in AS01E ( N = 8), with mean autologous tier 1 (CH505.w4.3)-neutralizing antibody ID50-titers of 2264 ± 2932, relative to those administered with CH505 TF Env gp120 alone formulated in AS01E ( N = 8), which by comparison, induced mean autologous tier 1 (CH505.w4.3)-neutralizing antibody ID50-titers of 630 ± 383.

Patterns (a) and (c) correlated with longer survival time (P < 0.05); (b) reached near significance (P < 0.07).

Although subgroup comparison only reached near significance (p = 0.07), probably due to the limited number of included trials, the large difference and opposite direction of ES (e.g., SMD = -0.49 vs. 0.11; a negative ES indicates results in favor of rTMS) suggests that the targeted brain region may influence the therapeutic outcome of rTMS.