Barely Significant
← all phrases

“reached borderline significance”

371 sentences · 371 papers · 408 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.0509

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

reached borderline significanceP = 0.0661.3× alphagold
In HIV-negative MSM, lifetime number of male sex partners reached borderline significance in univariable (odds ratio (OR) 5.0; 95% CI 1.0–25.4 for ≥501 partners compared to ≤100, overall P = 0.066) and multivariable analysis (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 5.2; 95% CI 0.8–32.6 for ≥501 partners compared to ≤100, overall P = 0.081).
reached borderline significancep = 0.0661.3× alphagold
Group 2 stiffness subscale score showed a tendency to lower scores and only reached borderline significance ( p = 0.066 and p = 0.053 at 6 and 12 months, resp.) (Tables 4 and 6 ).
reached borderline significanceP = 0.0681.4× alphagold
The prognosis analysis in GSE39582 (see Supplementary Table 4 for baseline characteristics) revealed that the APX3330-resolution score were significantly associated with an increased risk of recurrence in the univariate Cox regression (HR = 1.148, 95% CI: 1.054–2.081, P = 0.024) but only reached borderline significance after adjusted for other clinical factors (HR = 1.388, 95% CI: 0.976–1.974, P = 0.068) (Fig. 6 C-D).
reached borderline significanceP = 0.0681.4× alphagold
The leg study As previously described ( 25 ), overall TW ANOVA for repeated measurements revealed a main LPS effect to decrease glucose differences ( P = 0.015) in the leg, although glucose arterio-venous differences during the clamp only reached borderline significance ( P = 0.068) when tested separately.
reached borderline significanceP =0.0681.4× alphagold
Characteristics at the end of the study period At the end of the study period, significantly more patients in the TM groups were nonsmokers (76.6% vs 58.1%, P =0.002), whereas the proportion of patients having participated in a pulmonary rehabilitation program in the study period only reached borderline significance (38.0% vs 27.0%, P =0.068).
reached borderline significancep = 0.0691.4× alphagold
4 ), and as indicated, despite all point-estimates favoring WPM, only the VAS score for “How hungry do you feel?” for the lunch meal was significantly lower with WPM by the conventional p < 0.05, while several reached borderline significance, e.g., during breakfast (Feeling of fullness (p = 0.069) and amount you think you could eat (p = 0.056)) and lunch (satisfaction (p = 0.054), desire to eat (p = 0.084), CAC score (p = 0.054)).