“only marginally significant”

Intriguingly, the DMFS for females seemed to be better than for males; however, the difference was only marginally significant (HR, 6.45; 95% CI, 0.86–48.15; P = 0.069).

A similar effect, although only marginally significant, was observed for hookworm infections ( p = 0.069).

The hatch rate after short term oviposition-site deprivation apparently increased from zero to 20%, but this increase was only marginally significant (P < 0.069, Figure 4 ).

For the rhyme-related and unrelated comparison in the time window of 400–450 ms, the main effect of distractor type was not significant, the main effect of ROI was significant (distractor type: F (18,1) = 2.3, p = 0.146; ROI: F (144,8) = 13.89, p < 0.001), and the interaction between distractor type and ROI was only marginally significant ( F (144,8) = 1.87, p = 0.069).

2 ), this difference was only marginally significant (Mann–Whitney U test = 128.5, P = 0.069).

Motor function was also associated with executive functions (TMT-B), although this correlation was only marginally significant (rho = 0.426; p = 0.069 ( Table 3 ).

The block effect was significant for repeated items (6.2% to 10.8%, value = 0.33, χ 2 = 11.25, p = .002), but only marginally significant for new items (5.3% to 7.3%, value = 0.38, χ 2 = 4.45, p = .069), suggesting a stronger effect for repeated items.

The prime x timing interaction was only marginally significant ( p = .069, η 2 p = .122).

Ammonium addition also appeared to increase necrosis incidence, although the effect was only marginally significant (p = 0.0692), likely due to the high variability of this variable.

7 E), with a similar but only marginally significant difference in trial 2 (p = 0.0694) (Supplementary Table S2 ).

Elecsys t-tau and p-tau181 levels, as well as their ratios with Aβ 1-42 , were also markedly higher in pathology-confirmed AD compared to non-AD dementia (n = 8; all p < 0.001; Figure 1 ) and separated these groups with very high accuracy (AUC 0.94–0.97); differences in Aβ 1-42 levels, however, were only marginally significant ( p = 0.07, AUC [95% confidence interval] 0.71 [0.47–0.96]) ( Figure 2 ).

First, we measured carotenoids and chlorophyll in roots of 50 μM ABA-treated plants, and although only marginally significant ( P = 0.07), a trend toward increased chlorophyll a and carotenoid levels was observable ( Supplementary Figure S2 ).

The GFQ-Influence subscale was only marginally significant, β = .09, p = .07.

UAS group membership was only marginally significant ( β = −0.87, p = 0.07).

Having a migration background was associated with a higher likelihood of loneliness and perceived isolation in our study, whereas the association with objective isolation was only marginally significant ( p = 0.07).

For CO-associated simple conversion events with one-side GC f /AT f polymorphism, the conversion bias toward the GC f haplotype was slightly weaker and only marginally significant ( b = 0.06, P = 0.07, one-sample proportion test), probably because of limited sample size ( N = 435 events).

Denmark also had increases in inequality, but these changes were only marginally significant (0.30, p = 0.07; about a third of a standard deviation).

The same association is seen for those relatives who are also frequently contacted, though it is only marginally significant (chi-square association significance p = 0.07).

AQP1 expression was lower in the DAD than the control group but was only marginally significant (p = 0.07).

However, under kernel approach, the relationship between the proportion of species pairs with high trait overlap with species richness was only marginally significant for leaf size (r 2 = 0.14, p-value = 0.07 for leaf size, S6E Fig ) and none relationship was observed for SLA ( S6F Fig ).

Moreover, there was a trend toward lower incidence of grade II-III chronic GvHD in the intervention arm, but the difference was only marginally significant (34.0% vs. 48.9%, P=0.07; Table 2 ).

The same relationship, albeit only marginally significant, is observed for session 2 (TFT: p = .070; FFT: p = .057).

The association was attenuated at the median quantile ( τ = 0.50: B = 1.22, bootstrap standard error = 0.40, p < 0.01) and only marginally significant at the 75th percentile ( τ = 0.75: B = 0.68, bootstrap standard error = 0.37, p = 0.07).

A statistically significant difference was also detected in the fine mapped 24.7-Mb region of the chromosome in males ( p = 0.001), but the difference was only marginally significant in females ( p = 0.07).

This main effect was due to that confidence rating was higher when participants responded perceiving a fearful than angry or happy face, although the differences were only marginally significant ( P = 0.07, P = 0.08, respectively) ( Figure 5 A, left).