“only marginally significant”

Denmark also had increases in inequality, but these changes were only marginally significant (0.30, p = 0.07; about a third of a standard deviation).

The association was attenuated at the median quantile ( τ = 0.50: B = 1.22, bootstrap standard error = 0.40, p < 0.01) and only marginally significant at the 75th percentile ( τ = 0.75: B = 0.68, bootstrap standard error = 0.37, p = 0.07).

Negative Binomial Analyses: ADHD Symptomatology, EF, and Face Touching Frequency Model 1b: Only ADHD Symptomatology As seen in Table V , negative binomial regression analyses for Model 1b, Wald’s test indicated that inattention was not a significant predictor of face touching frequency ( p = .55), and hyperactivity/impulsivity was only marginally significant ( p = .07).

(The tideflat model was only marginally significant when an outlier was removed ( R 2 adj = 0.28, P = 0.07, n = 10)).

Within the intervention arm, the Intervention Fidelity Index suggested a positive trend toward greater likelihood of vaccination at the initial visit, but it was only marginally significant ( p = 0.07) (See Additional file 1 : Table S3).

Similar trends were observed for lip nest height, but were all only marginally significant ( GLMM, χ 2 = 5.22 , p = 0.07).

They also reported less momentary loneliness, though the relation was only marginally significant this time, r (599) = −0.07, p = 0.07.

Analysis of variance found that reader expertise was only marginally significant ( p = 0.07) and all interactions involving expertise were non‐significant ( p > 0.2).

Similar to the student‐specific goals, our explorative analyses indicated that this finding was likely primarily driven by mastery goals, however, their statistical effect was only marginally significant ( p = .07).

This effect was only marginally significant for the P50 amplitude (F(1,18)=3.85, p=0.07).

Kruskal–Wallis tests showed group differences in anger ( p = .02), disgust ( p = .002), and happiness recognition ( p = .04); however, the group effect on fear recognition was only marginally significant ( p = .07).

Also IVS31-74G>A was found more frequently in cases (8.7%) than in control individuals (4.3%), but the difference was only marginally significant (odds ratio 2.1, 95% confidence interval 0.92–4.85; P = 0.07).

However, the differences were only marginally significant (p < 0.07); one reason for this could be the exclusion of dropout students from the statistical analysis, which would lead to a narrower range of ratings that does not allow for the capture of the full range of relationships.

The GFQ-Influence subscale was only marginally significant, β = .09, p = .07.

This association was present regardless of race, as in the model, the interaction of race and diabetes is only marginally significant (p = 0.07), which may be due to small sample size within each subgroup.

Consanguineous marriage showed a positive but only marginally significant association with LBW (β = 0.013, SE = 0.007, z = 1.81, p = 0.070).

A similar difference was revealed by a comparison between words and non-linguistic control stimuli in the first peak [ F (1, 15) = 9.76, p = 0.01] and, although only marginally significant, in the last peak as well [ F (1, 15) = 3.71, p = 0.07].

Under repeat conditions, the Active group had a lower ERD value in the beta band at the parietal region than the sham group, but the difference was only marginally significant ( P = 0.07).

Age group differences were only marginally significant for AUT-brick flexibility [ t (37) = 1.84, p = 0.07].

However, the difference was statistically only marginally significant regarding the incidence of PONV in the 5 studied checkpoints ( p = 0.07) ( Table 3 ).

However, this was only marginally significant ( p = 0.07) ( Figure 2 D).

Total time spent in the store was slightly longer in the intervention condition than in the control condition, but this difference was only marginally significant ( P =.07).

The only marginally significant relation found was between multilingualism as a continuous score and RT specifically in incongruent trials [ t (154) = 1.82, p = 0.070].

[ 33 ] suggested that 4-16 years-old boys with diagnosed ADHD have a smaller head circumference than the normal non-clinical population, although the association was only marginally significant among those boys who did not receive medication (n = 52, p = .07).

However, Charge Rates were quite variable, especially when measured in the empty assay, so the main effect of recent experience on Charge Rate was only marginally significant ( F 1,28 = 3.5, P = 0.07) in our repeated-measures ANOVA.