4C ), although the correlation was only marginally significant (p=0.068).
← all phrases
“only marginally significant”
Sighted at
p<1.0p=0.9
In the literature
However, the effect on PGD DSM-5-TR grief levels was only marginally significant ( p = .068), likely due to power issues.
When the boundary was after n − 1, gaze duration was longer in the dissimilar condition, than in the identical condition, but the effect was only marginally significant, b = 20, SE = 10.8, p = .068; although the same pattern was observed for first fixation duration and single fixation, this effect was not significant, p s > .2.
On arrogance recognition the differences were only marginally significant [ H = 5.364; P = 0.068].
Median progression-free survival from the initial treatment was also higher in the RFA group (5 months) than in the chemotherapy group (3.3 months), but the difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.068) ( Fig. 3D ).
Simple slope tests showed that optimism positively predicted well-being for Euro-Canadians ( b = 0.40, t = 4.35, p < 0.001), but the effect was weaker and only marginally significant for Chinese ( b = 0.17, t = 1.83, p = 0.068).
The results showed that the nonshared GMV correlates of lack of premeditation showed stronger correlation with lack of premeditation ( r = .045, p < .001) than with sensation seeking ( r = .024, p = .009) subscore, although the difference in the slope of regression was only marginally significant ( t = 1.83, p = .068).
CSF acuity tended to be negatively correlated with AL but was only marginally significant ( r = −0.218, P = 0.068).
Familial PD patients were 2.4 times more likely than sporadic LOPD to have a molecular diagnosis due to P/LP variants in high-confidence genes, although this association was only marginally significant (OR = 2.39, 95% CI: 0.93–6.22, p = 0.068).
Improvement of the coordination of care dimension was only marginally significant ( t (115) = 1.51, p = 0.068).
This model confirms the above hypothesis: the estimated effect of participation day is reduced from 6.0 to 3.2% and becomes only marginally significant once we control for expected donations (coeff = 0.032, s.e. = 0.017, p = 0.068; electronic supplementary material, table A2, model 1a).
Headache sufferers reported slightly more pain as well, but this was only marginally significant (7.3/10, p = 0.068).
While this association was only marginally significant in regression analysis ( p = 0.069), the pattern suggests that cognitive restructuring may be a valuable therapeutic target in violent ASPD offenders.
Although the autonomy by relatedness interaction was only marginally significant for Neglect ( p = .069), the effects were in the expected direction (β = −.17, t = 1.64, p = .10, 95% CI = [–0.3658, 0.0339] for low levels of autonomy vs. β = −.42, t = 2.61, p = .01, 95% CI = [–0.7360, –0.1026] for high levels of autonomy).
Non-Sarcopenic Patients The mean survival time was 91.8 ± 4.2 months for non-sarcopenic patients and 80.0 ± 5.2 months for sarcopenic patients; the difference was only marginally significant (log-rank test, p = 0.069; Fig 3 ).
Although dominance orientation was negatively correlated with forgiveness, it was only marginally significant ( r 485 = − .08, p = .069).
When considering the full model with social environment determinants, HIV knowledge was only marginally significant ( p = 0.069).
Overexpression of EGFR (>85% tumour cell staining) was more frequently found in tumours with late T stage, although this difference was only marginally significant ( P =0.069).
2 ), this difference was only marginally significant (Mann–Whitney U test = 128.5, P = 0.069).
spretus although the effect was only marginally significant (prevalence: Χ 2 = 5.36, df = 2, P = 0.069*; intensity: NA; abundance: Χ 2 = 5.48, df = 2, P = 0.065*).
Strikingly, even when patients were producing the subject of a passive sentence, we detected numerically more objects (i.e., incongruent detections) than subjects (congruent), although this difference was only marginally significant ( χ 2 (1) = 2.210, p = 0.069, difference in proportions = 0.010, 95% CI = [ −0.001, 1], one-sided Test of Equal Proportions).
Also when testing only whether the females from cooperatively breeding species landed more often on the provisioning perch than the females from species that do not breed cooperatively, the results were only marginally significant (Welch t-test: t = −1.64, df = 8.30, p-value=0.069).
We noticed a similar trend in neopterin levels, but the difference was only marginally significant (1.44 vs. 1.17 ng/mL, p = 0.069).
However, the product of the two path coefficients was only marginally significant ( ab = 0.013, z = 1.81, p = 0.069).
The statistical analysis showed that the number of dimensions in the final stepwise DFA was lower in the bilingual model than in the monolingual model, although this was only marginally significant [5.97 < 7.00, t (5) = 2.31, p = 0.069].