A 2 (group: control, patient) by 2 (spatial cue: PSS, PSC) ANOVA showed that the main effect of group was significant (F 1,66 = 11.751, p = 0.001), the main effect of spatial condition was only marginally significant (F 1,66 = 3.472, p < 0.067), and the interaction between group and spatial condition was not significant (F 1,66 = 0.323, p = 0.571).
← all phrases
“only marginally significant”
Sighted at
p<1.0p=0.9
In the literature
Gaze samples away proportions (GSP) GSP was higher in the arithmetic task ( M = 0.093 SD = 0.08) than in the naming task ( M = 0.065, SD = 0.046), but this trend was only marginally significant ( t (19) = 1.948, p = 0.067, Cohen's d = 0.422).
However, this was only marginally significant, R 2 = 0.155, Δ R 2 = 0.066, Δ F (2, 72) = 2.809, p = 0.067; therefore, the effect was not explored further. 3.2.2.
Counties with higher hospital admissions per capita also have higher sepsis death rates, but this association is only marginally significant ( b = 0.05, SE = 0.02, p = 0.067).
OD = 0.99 ± 0.08, n = 12) ( Figure 3 a,b), but the difference is only marginally significant ( p = 0.067).
As can be seen in Figure 2 , a majority of children (18) showed improvements in their SIPC scores from pre- to post-intervention, although the effect was only marginally significant [ t (30) = -1.903, p = 0.067, effect size r : 0.333, Cohen’s d : -0.706].
This proportion, although only marginally significant ( P = 0.067, hypergeometric test; Fig. 5B ), indicated that the gene embeddings indeed could be used to identify more disease-associated genes.
At the multivariate level, however, low (0.1–133 mg/w) caffeine consumption from energy drinks was related to high stress levels, although no such observation was made regarding high consumption (≥133 mg/w), and the overall effect was only marginally significant ( p = 0.067).
The mean metastatic area was the smallest in mice treated with irradiation and 75 mg/kg celecoxib daily (group 6); however, the difference was only marginally significant (p = 0.0675).
Wing movement complexity and head movement complexity also differed between exclusively temperate species and species with ranges spanning both high and low latitudes (wing movement, P = 0.040; head movement, P = 0.032), while there were only marginally significant differences in post hoc effects between these two groups in models for total complexity ( P = 0.068).
The HR-CTV D90 was 88.4% in 2D-based plans and 97.7% in 3D-based plans, although the difference was only marginally significant ( P = 0.068).
With the obsession scale, the experimental group reported a mean reduction of 1.43 and the control group a reduction of 0.56, while difference was only marginally significant, t (28) = 1.90, p = 0.068, it had a medium effect size (0.69).
Extent of root colonization by hyphae, vesicles, and arbuscules did not change significantly under short-term shading, but the first two decreased significantly under long-term shading ( F 1,18 = 25.1, p < 0.001 and F 1,18 = 29.2, p < 0.001, respectively), whereas the decrease of the root occupancy by arbuscules was only marginally significant ( p = 0.068).
Still, this difference was only marginally significant in the male patients with three or more BC abnormalities (log-rank test: p = 0.068).
In each of these species, the overall pattern of recovery contrasted across park boundaries, showing net recovery (increase in percentage cover) inside the park but net mortality outside (one-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test, P<0.05 for the brooders though only marginally significant for M. annularis at P = 0.068).
Although these improvements were only marginally significant both for NRS tinnitus loudness and TQ score ( P = 0.068 for both parameters), considering the small number of included subjects, the improvements can be regarded to indicate a meaningful alleviation of tinnitus and tinnitus-related loudness.
However, this difference was found to be only marginally significant when examined using a chi-square test (χ 2 1 =3.38; P =.068; N=65).
ITPC1 showed an opposite response to voicing in stops compared to fricatives/sibilants: voiced stops had significantly higher ITPC1 values than unvoiced ones ( p = 0.001), while voiced fricatives/sibilants showed lower values than unvoiced ones, but this trend was only marginally significant ( p = 0.068).
The five-year and ten-year disease-free survival rates were 82% and 48% for patients ages 40 years and under, and were 93% and 84% for patients older than 40 years, although the difference between the groups was only marginally significant (p=0.068).
CSF acuity tended to be negatively correlated with AL but was only marginally significant ( r = −0.218, P = 0.068).
The effect of the device was only marginally significant (χ 2 (3) = 7.11, p = .068), indicating that participants worked faster with a computer and computer mouse than with a smartphone ( p = .041). 7 Other models with the interaction between the device and other factors did not improve the fit (all values of p > .7).
Effects of taxonomic diversity and environmental variables on phylogenetic diversity-functional diversity relationships When testing the relationships between the different diversity metrics and environmental variables for spiders, our final SEMs indicated good fit with the data (Fisher's C = 1.075, p = 0.898; figure 3 ). Salinity and litter depth were linked to spider PD (positive link, selected in the model but only marginally significant: p = 0.068) and FD (negative link, selected in the model and again almost significant: p = 0.051), respectively.
Although high SESN2 expression was associated with good CRC prognosis in GSE161158 ( P = 0.046) ( Figure 5I ), the association between SESN2 expression and CRC prognosis was only marginally significant in TCGA ( P = 0.068) ( Figure 5J ).
4C ), although the correlation was only marginally significant (p=0.068).
The results showed that the nonshared GMV correlates of lack of premeditation showed stronger correlation with lack of premeditation ( r = .045, p < .001) than with sensation seeking ( r = .024, p = .009) subscore, although the difference in the slope of regression was only marginally significant ( t = 1.83, p = .068).