Barely Significant
← all phrases

“only marginally significant”

5,077 sentences · 5,077 papers · 5,448 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<1.0p=0.9

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

only marginally significantP = 0.061.2× alphagold
Birth weight decreased by 120 to 130 grams as maternal homocysteine level increased (codominant model: β = −120.90, 95% CI −246.88 to 5.08; additive model: β = −130.28, 95% CI −266.68 to 6.13) after adjustment for potential confounding variables, although this association was only marginally significant ( P = 0.06).
only marginally significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
However, when the two subtests were examined separately, only the backward condition of the Corsi blocks task significantly predicted the subtest Series (β = 0.22, p < 0.05), and the backward condition of the digit-span test predicted the subtest Concepts, although in latter case it was only marginally significant (β = 0.18, p = 0.06).
only marginally significantp = .061.2× alphagold
Familiarity We found a main effect of opponent on familiarity ratings ( F (1.92, 74.77) = 5.18, p = .009, η 2 p = .12), with the human opponent being perceived as more familiar than the roulette ( p = .009) and the computer, even though the difference was only marginally significant ( p = .06).
Computer anthropomorphisation in a socio-economic dilemma.
Behav Res Methods · 2024 · PMC10830593
only marginally significantp = 0.0611.2× alphagold
Concerning ratings of frequency and preference of use, although they were close to the mid-point of the 1 to 7 scale (1 = ‘only Catalan,’ 7 = ‘only Spanish’), they were slightly biased toward both using and preferring Catalan over Spanish ( M = 3.63, SD = 1.03, Minimum = 2.00, Maximum = 6.50, Range = 4.50, for frequency of use, and M = 3.51, SD = 1.32, Minimum = 1.00, Maximum = 5.75, Range = 4.75, for preference of use, respectively), although one-sampled t -tests revealed that the difference with respect to the mid-point of the scale was only marginally significant ( p = 0.061 and p = 0.050 for frequency and preference, respectively).