Birth weight decreased by 120 to 130 grams as maternal homocysteine level increased (codominant model: β = −120.90, 95% CI −246.88 to 5.08; additive model: β = −130.28, 95% CI −266.68 to 6.13) after adjustment for potential confounding variables, although this association was only marginally significant ( P = 0.06).
← all phrases
“only marginally significant”
Sighted at
p<1.0p=0.9
In the literature
Finally, the path from attitude to intention was significant for students ( β = .75, p < .001), while it was only marginally significant for adults ( β = .28, p = .06; z = -2.14, p < .05).
They reported that RT dose was an important factor that determined survival after LR, as among the many factors investigated, only RT dose was statistically significant (p = 0.001) and surgical resection of LR was only marginally significant (p = 0.06).
However, when the two subtests were examined separately, only the backward condition of the Corsi blocks task significantly predicted the subtest Series (β = 0.22, p < 0.05), and the backward condition of the digit-span test predicted the subtest Concepts, although in latter case it was only marginally significant (β = 0.18, p = 0.06).
However, the two chromatic components used by Hurlbert and Ling ( 2007 ) yielded only marginally significant predictions, R 2 = .46, F (2, 9) = 3.9, p = .06.
The weight of the 33‐Hz oscillator was significantly lower than the one of the 17‐Hz one for the NR group ( Z = 6.39, p < .001), whereas the difference between weights was only marginally significant for the DYS ( z = 1.87, p = .06).
Consistent with the hypotheses, in the final model (Step 4), greater infertility stigma for both men and women was associated with higher search for meaning (men β = 0.26; women β = 0.20), however the association for men was only marginally significant ( p = 0.06).
No gender differences were observed in family–work conflict and opinions about remote work, whereas women showed greater remote work engagement than men, although the difference was only marginally significant ( M w = 3.15; M m = 2.92; F = 3.42, p = .06).
Familiarity We found a main effect of opponent on familiarity ratings ( F (1.92, 74.77) = 5.18, p = .009, η 2 p = .12), with the human opponent being perceived as more familiar than the roulette ( p = .009) and the computer, even though the difference was only marginally significant ( p = .06).
Also in contrast to the early P3, the SI-perpetrator × Trait-BIS interaction was only marginally significant for the late parietal P3 amplitude, F (4,88) = 2.32, p = 0.06, η 2 = 0.10.
When including both vmPFC effect on k g and aIns effect on k l in the choice model, the regression with NPM was only marginally significant ( p = 0.06), meaning that residual error was roughly flat (Fig. 3b ).
However, we removed the hierarchical rank from the in-strength model because the deviance was more adapted without this predictor, although only marginally significant (LRT: deviance = −325.93, Df = 4, p = 0.06).
There were only marginally significant differences in change in percentage of vegetable consumed or HFV consumed between the intervention and control groups ( p =.06 and p =.02, respectively).
Note that, likely because of the modest frequency of the A2 blood group (~ 5%), the association was only marginally significant ( p = 0.06).
At first blush, a change in the number of pumps from the 2nd to the 3rd block emerged, but the difference was only marginally significant, t (22) = 1.95, p = .06.
Findings indicate significant increases in liking ( p < .01) and sharing ( p < .01) destinations’ Facebook posts, but only marginally significant changes in commenting behavior ( p = .06).
However, further pair-wise t-tests for the congruency effect per electrode site indicated that the congruency effect was only marginally significant at electrode sites PO6 (t(17) = 2.01, p = 0.06) and PO8 (t(17) = 1.78, p = 0.09).
A chi-square test revealed that the four groups exhibited no significant differences in terms of sex (χ 2 = 1.95, p = 0.58) or grade taught (χ 2 = 1.88, p = 0.60) and only marginally significant differences in terms of whether they were head teachers (χ 2 = 7.58, p = 0.06).
Moreover, new foliage produced in 2013 following feeding by progrediens on young (2012) and mature (2011) tissues was found to be 11% higher in N concentration than foliage produced by controls, although this effect was only marginally significant ( F 1,28 = 3.80, P = 0.06).
Post-hoc comparisons showed that, when comparing FTA cards with capillary tubes, the odds were 3.375 higher on average, and when compared to filter paper, the odds were only marginally significant, 3.344 higher in average ( p = 0.0603), when controlling by all other variables.
By contrast, in the model using Days 1 to 3 RT, the neocortical tau × age group interaction was only marginally significant ( β = −0.36, 95% CI = [−0.73, 0.02], p = 0.061).
Marginal mean increase for BR upon C addition was positively related to PC1; however, this relationship was only marginally significant (Pearson’s correlation, r = 0.513, n = 14, p = 0.061).
Concerning ratings of frequency and preference of use, although they were close to the mid-point of the 1 to 7 scale (1 = ‘only Catalan,’ 7 = ‘only Spanish’), they were slightly biased toward both using and preferring Catalan over Spanish ( M = 3.63, SD = 1.03, Minimum = 2.00, Maximum = 6.50, Range = 4.50, for frequency of use, and M = 3.51, SD = 1.32, Minimum = 1.00, Maximum = 5.75, Range = 4.75, for preference of use, respectively), although one-sampled t -tests revealed that the difference with respect to the mid-point of the scale was only marginally significant ( p = 0.061 and p = 0.050 for frequency and preference, respectively).
After EPLAs, non-papilloma patients had significant improvements in SNOT-22 and VAS ( P -values = 0.012 and 0.012, respectively), while those with papillomas had only marginally significant improvements in VAS ( P -value = 0.061).
Notably, if the B1+ covariates were not included in analyses, the association between log income-to-needs ratio and whole-brain T1w/T2w ratio was larger though still only marginally significant ( B = -.00583, SE = .00311, t = -1.88, p = .061).