“only marginally significant”

By contrast, in the model using Days 1 to 3 RT, the neocortical tau × age group interaction was only marginally significant ( β = −0.36, 95% CI = [−0.73, 0.02], p = 0.061).

Marginal mean increase for BR upon C addition was positively related to PC1; however, this relationship was only marginally significant (Pearson’s correlation, r = 0.513, n = 14, p = 0.061).

When using self-reported T1 JS as a predictor for parent-rated T1 prosocial and aggressive behavior, there were only marginally significant links between victim JS and parent-rated T1 aggressive behavior (β = 0.118, p = 0.061) and perpetrator JS and prosocial behavior [β = 0.140, p = 0.065; χ 2 ( df = 34) = 93.542, p < 0.001, CFI = 0.978, RMSEA = 0.036 (0.028; 0.045), SRMR = 0.019; N = 1,323].

Likewise, males with wider carapaces were significantly less prone to bridge (Male CW: t 11 = -2.350, p = 0.019), and a negative relationship was also found for body mass, although this last relationship was only marginally significant (Male mass: t 11 = -1.668, p = 0.061; Figure 5c, d ; see also tables A4, A5 in Additional file 1 , and Figure A2 in Additional file 2 ).

The rats in the SPS + KRG100 group showed an increased latency to enter the dark compartment for retention compared to the SPS group, although this result was only marginally significant ( p = 0.061).

Floral larceny led to a decrease in the number of flowers per bout, although the impact on the latter was only marginally significant (−19.5%, p = 0.061; Fig. 3 b and Table S3 ).

3 ); however, owing to the limited sample size, this relationship was only marginally significant for leptin ( p = 0.061) and even less significant for ObR ( p = 0.137).

When participants were in a concrete mind-set, they allocated more money to luxurious consumption ( M = 2919.44, SD = 285.99) than people in an abstract mind-set ( M = 2008.11, SD = 282.1), p = .026, as well as allocated less money to long-term savings ( M = 4708.56, SD = 408.09) than people in an abstract mind-set ( M = 5797.3, SD = 402.54), although this effect was only marginally significant, p = .061.

After cervical adenocarcinoma surgery, a CA125 level ≥ 50 U/mL is an independent factor for OS (HR = 2.27), but it is only marginally significant for Locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) ( p = 0.061), suggesting that it is more sensitive to “long-term death” rather than “early local failure" [ 29 ].

Our findings demonstrate that circulating leptin levels were significantly and positively associated LSM (β = 0.070; p = 0.024), even after adjustment for age, gender, and insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), whereas the association with steatosis (as measured by CAP) was only marginally significant (β = 0.901; p = 0.061).

However, this difference by plot type was only marginally significant ( p = 0.061), indicating that methods such as size fractionation and chemical analyses are needed to better clarify the magnitude at which fungal necromass contributes to the POM pool under climate change.

Childhood trauma did not predict mean HR (β = .013, t = 1.329, p = .780), and the interaction between childhood trauma and time was only marginally significant (β = −.239, t = −1.889, p = .061).

Although the interaction between specific root length plasticity and source population was only marginally significant ( p = .061), the model with the interaction term clearly fit our data better than a no‐interaction model, based on both AIC (ΔAIC = 7.3) and a likelihood ratio test ( p = .004).

In this experiment, participants in the Pinyin group (mean = 2.53; SD = 0.834) required on average more cycles than did participants in the Zhuyin group (mean = 2.00; SD = 0.655); however, this difference was only marginally significant [ F (1, 28) = 3.797, p = 0.061, partial η 2 = 0.119].

In contrast, ln(IL-6) was only marginally significant (P = 0.061), while NEU, CRP, NLR, SII, and demographic variables (age and gender) showed no significant associations (all P > 0.05).

In thickness < 15 mm, high BMI was a significant risk factors in multivariate analysis ( P = 0.013), thickness was a risk factor in univariate analysis ( P = 0.043) but was only marginally significant in multivariate analysis ( P = 0.061).

However, this difference was only marginally significant ( F (1, 6, 786.05) = 3.51; p = 0.061).

Heifer DMI as a % of BW from d 0 to 14 decreased linearly ( P = 0.020) as time of rest increased; however, this impact was only marginally significant ( P ≥ 0.061) for the remainder of the trial.

However, increased switch-cost in control conditions (tested with one-sample t -tests against constant value 0 for ΔLA) was only marginally significant for the late afternoon sessions [+1.81 ± 4.28, t (21) = 1.981; P = 0.061; d = 0.42] and decreased switch-cost failed to reach statistical significance after both interventions [-0.71 ± 3.36, t (21) = -0.996; P = 0.331; d = 0.21].

However, the effect was only marginally significant in the explicit reward group, mean difference = 0.018 (SD = 0.011), 95% CI [− 0.005, 0.040], p = 0.061, and non-significant in the ambiguous reward group, mean difference = 0.021 (SD = 0.011), 95% CI [− 0.001, 0.044], p = 0.122.

A similar (but only marginally significant) pattern was observed for the dual positivity of ER and PR (10% cut-off) and the increased expression of these two lncRNAs (GNG12-AS1, p = 0.0611; NRSN2-AS1, p = 0.0738).

Differences between Highly Advanced and Basic users were only marginally significant ( p = 0.062), and no other pairwise comparisons reached significance (Table S9–S10 in Supplementary Information S4 ).

However, it is interesting to point out that the main effects of modality transition and CSI as well as the interaction of modality transition and CSI were significant for each group in the individual RT analyses (except the effect of modality transition in the manual/foot group, which was only marginally significant, F (1, 21) = 4.9, p = .062, η p 2 = .413.

The change between T0 and T2 was only marginally significant ( p = 0.062), likely because of the high variability in the MP group.

In accordance with our main hypothesis, OCI-R scores were positively correlated (using a non-parametric permutation test due to the violation of normality) with transition uncertainty ( h ) in the probabilistic condition ( r = .31, p = .017; Fig 5A ), whereas the effect in the deterministic condition was only marginally significant ( r = .24, p = .062; Fig 5B ).