Barely Significant
← all phrases

“only marginally significant”

5,077 sentences · 5,077 papers · 5,448 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<1.0p=0.9

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

only marginally significantp = .061.2× alphagold
Mean perilesional perfusion changes compared to homologous contralateral regions While a numerical difference in perilesional perfusion between the left ( M = 0.54, SD = 0.33) and right side ( M = 0.64, SD = 0.29) of the brain was still observed at follow up, this difference was only marginally significant, t (12) = 2.08, p = .06, q = .045, ns.
only marginally significantp = .061.2× alphagold
We also found support for the hypothesis ( Hypothesis 4 ) that workers’ need for structure at work negatively predicts their perceived effectiveness of blended working (see Table 3 ), although in the regression analyses (see Table 4 ), the link between need for structure and the perceived effectiveness of location-independent working was only marginally significant ( p = .06).
Blended working: for whom it may (not) work.
PLoS One · 2014 · PMC4102582
only marginally significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Linear regression with R-PDT Time 1 as the dependent variable and pointing accuracy on the triangle completion task, PTA, and MR efficiency as predictors was only marginally significant, F (3, 63) = 2.54, p = 0.06, R-square = 0.12, with PTA efficiency being the only significant predictor of R-PDT Time 1 performance ( p = 0.047). 2.3.3.
only marginally significantp = .061.2× alphagold
The main effect of Congruency Level of Previous Trial was only marginally significant ( F (1, 22) = 2.62, p = .06, η p 2 = .1). 4 Discussion Similar to the results of Experiment 2, the CSE was less pronounced in target/distractor category alternation trials than in target/distractor category repetition trials.
only marginally significantP = 0.061.2× alphagold
Birth weight decreased by 120 to 130 grams as maternal homocysteine level increased (codominant model: β = −120.90, 95% CI −246.88 to 5.08; additive model: β = −130.28, 95% CI −266.68 to 6.13) after adjustment for potential confounding variables, although this association was only marginally significant ( P = 0.06).