“only marginally significant”

However, the model was only marginally significant (χ 2 (9, N = 149) = 16.850, p = 0.051) in the girls’ sample.

Indeed, the 8.5 entrainment group showed a higher, albeit only marginally significant, TFR relative to the 11.5 Hz group (11.5 Hz group: mean = 0.32, SD = 0.12; 8.5 Hz group: mean = 0.39, SD = 0.13; t (58) = −2.00, p = 0.051).

While the rate of successful reperfusion was only marginally significant at 83.3% for patients with a good outcome compared to 50.0% for those with a poor outcome ( p = 0.051), the rate of successful reperfusion of newly embolized territory was significantly higher in the good outcome group (91.7%) than in the poor outcome group (30.8%, p < 0.001), with shorter procedure time (53 ± 27 min vs. 113 ± 55 min, respectively, p < 0.001).

Mean epigenetic diversity across loci also differs in both measures, though this difference is only marginally significant for uh when using a p value cutoff of 0.05 (uh: Kruskal–Wallis, χ 2 3 = 7.769, P = 0.051; SD: Kruskal–Wallis, χ 2 3 = 36.543, P < 0.001, Fig. 2 C, D ).

The caudate volume was also lower in the Aβ+ group, but this difference was only marginally significant (p = 0.051).

We observed that patients with the FF genotype had higher GH levels after treatment than patients with ff genotype, but the difference was only marginally significant ( P = 0.051).

candida were smaller at 25 °C for quantiles 0.85 and 0.95, although this effect was only marginally significant for the 0.95 quantile ( P = 0.051; Fig. 4A ; Table S6 ).

LNFP III exhibited a gradual decrease over time in Se+/Le+ and Se−Le+ milk ( p < 0.001), with only marginally significant change observed in Se+/Le− milk ( p = 0.051).

The main effect of electrode position was only marginally significant ( F (1.30, 36.49) = 3.72, p = 0.051, η p 2 = 0.12).

In the final model, the regression coefficient was reduced by 35% from 0.782 to 0.510 and was only marginally significant ( p = 0.051).

Body weight gain (BWG) during days 1–21 tended to be higher in enzyme-supplemented groups compared with the control group; however, this difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.051).

In pIPS, only the comparisons “Photo minus Photo-Sketch” and “Drawing minus Drawing-Sketch” reached significance (all p < 0.003, sign-permutation test, FDR-corrected), while the other comparisons were only marginally significant (all p = 0.051, sign-permutation test, FDR-corrected).

The main effect of Group was only marginally significant (F 1,111 = 3.88; p = 0.051; pƞ 2 = 0.03).

The interaction was only marginally significant (F (4,40) = 3.057, p = 0.051).

Leaf out was delayed 1.83 days (SE 0.69) in thermokarst troughs compared to thermokarst tops ( t 55 = 2.66, P = 0.049) but presented 1.32 days (SE 0.50) earlier in thermokarst tops than control tops, though this was also found to be only marginally significant ( t 55 = 2.64, P = 0.051).

The final reduced model explained 27% of variability; however, the effect of the weight category was only marginally significant ( p = 0.0511), while the real health risk to humans remained insignificant.

Although there was a tendency for, overall, fewer mosquitoes to land when exposed to looming squares, this effect was only marginally significant (Generalized linear model: p = 0.0514; Fig. 2 C).

The change induced by knockdown of HDAC3 was only marginally significant ( P = 0.05154).

Unsurprisingly, populations with lower percentage of vegetarians have greater life expectancy, though the relationship is only marginally significant likely due to small sample size ( r =−0.303, p=0.0518, n=30).

Reaction times revealed group performance differences, whereas differences in accuracy were only marginally significant (p = 0.052, ƞ 2 = 0.050).

Although only marginally significant ( P = 0.052), total DTG levels were on average 10-fold reduced in 35S- jmt -1 leaves.

The estimated Cohen’s d value (0.69) indicates a median effect size of habitat type on nubbin growth in the presence of corallivorous fishes, although this difference was only marginally significant, likely to due to high variability in growth rates (GLMM: estimate = −90.7, SE = 46.6, z = −1.97, p = 0.052).

However, after the correction, this relation remained only marginally significant ( p = 0.052).

The increase in completion time from Auditory trial 5 ( M = 46.68, SD = 11.52) to Auditory trial 6 ( M = 53.96, SD = 11.88) was highly significant ( t (11) = 8.82, p < 0.001), whereas the increase in completion time from Tactile trial 5 ( M = 52.21, SD = 12.03) to Tactile trial 6 ( M = 55.98, SD = 12.22) was only marginally significant ( t (11) = 2.18, p = 0.052).

In the 56-day acclimation group, RMR dropped in the high temperature acclimation group (4°C and 430 μatm), becoming only marginally significant ( P = 0.052).