“only marginally significant”

Only marginally significant effects were shown on psychological distress ( t = -1.99, p = 0.051) and physical symptoms ( t = -1.83, p = 0.07) at 1-month follow-up.

We also found a moderate positive relationship between Gas6 and EGFR post-treatment values, but the correlation was only marginally significant (r = 0.442, p = 0.051).

However, in women ( n = 66), the trend was only marginally significant (TJT = 614.5, p = 0.051).

Leaf out was delayed 1.83 days (SE 0.69) in thermokarst troughs compared to thermokarst tops ( t 55 = 2.66, P = 0.049) but presented 1.32 days (SE 0.50) earlier in thermokarst tops than control tops, though this was also found to be only marginally significant ( t 55 = 2.64, P = 0.051).

For Caucasian participants ( Fig 3B ) the main effect of format was only marginally significant, F (2,70) = 3.10, MSE = 0.89, p = .051,η p 2 = .08.

Univariate Cox analysis demonstrated that HER2-positive patients had better BCSS than HER2-low patients (hazard ratio = 0.422, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.199–0.892, P = 0.024), while the survival difference between the HER2-zero and HER2-low groups was only marginally significant (HR = 1.797, 95% CI = 0.997–3.239, P = 0.051).

those who were still considered children) revealed an upward trend in pregnancy experience, from 3.3% in 2003, to 4.3% in 2008, and 5.0% in 2013, but this was only marginally significant ( P = 0.051).

Unlike bacteria, the direct effect of RAI was larger and positive, yet only marginally significant ( β RAI → BFratio direct = 0.810 , p = .051).

Regarding nationality, non-Saudis (52%) use specific services more frequently than Saudis (40%), but this difference is only marginally significant ( P = 0.051).

The difference between invalid and neutral cue trials (M = 505.63, SEM = 10.10) was only marginally significant (t 34 = 2.02, p = .051, r 2 = .11) ( Fig 2C ).

There were no statistically significant differences in call rates for arc chirps, tonal chirps, or upsweeps between seasons in Humboldt (Table 3 ); however, there tended to be a greater rate of trills in summer with a large effect size ( r = .52), although only marginally significant ( p = .051).

The Ab response of males to DBL1 (3D7 and 7G8 p<0.0001) and DBL1+2 (p<0.0001) was lower than females; whereas, the difference between males and females to DBL2 was only marginally significant (p = 0.051) ( Fig. 6 ).

Further, 3-year-old girls learned more words when they dragged the named objects ( M = 3.98, SE = 0.38) than when they simply watched the objects move without interacting with the screen ( M = 2.78, SE = 0.30), although this 1.20-word difference was only marginally significant, 95% CI [-0.003, 2.41], p = 0.051.

In multivariate analysis, pretreatment D-dimer level was the only marginally significant risk factor associated with VTE development (hazard ratio = 1.32; 95%CI: 1.00-1.75, P = 0.051).

Differences in participants’ graduation were only marginally significant, χ 2 (1) = 0.52, p = .051.

Indeed, the 8.5 entrainment group showed a higher, albeit only marginally significant, TFR relative to the 11.5 Hz group (11.5 Hz group: mean = 0.32, SD = 0.12; 8.5 Hz group: mean = 0.39, SD = 0.13; t (58) = −2.00, p = 0.051).

The only other tract in which behavioral improvement was associated with FA changes was the right SLF-FP, but this effect was only marginally significant ( r = 0.466, p = 0.051, n = 18, 95 % confidence interval, bootstrapped from 1,000 samples: 0.066–0.747 s; Supplementary Fig. 2, Online Resource 4).

However, in a linear-mixed effects model, this effect was only marginally significant ( t (25) = −2.05, p = 0.051), indicating strong differences in baseline reaction times overall between participants.

In addition, children’s early externalizing behaviors were positively related to the intercept of using media to keep children busy (although this relationship was only marginally significant), β = 0.24, S.E. = 0.12, p = 0.051, and parent education was negatively related to the intercept of using media to calm children, β = −0.22 S.E. = 0.10, p = 0.022, as well as educational purposes, β = 0.01, S.E. = 0.10, p = 0.029.

In pIPS, only the comparisons “Photo minus Photo-Sketch” and “Drawing minus Drawing-Sketch” reached significance (all p < 0.003, sign-permutation test, FDR-corrected), while the other comparisons were only marginally significant (all p = 0.051, sign-permutation test, FDR-corrected).

In this case, the difference between the PT and the FT groups in the CEG is only marginally significant (X 2 = 3.810, p = 0.051).

However, the results obtained for the SK-OV-3 cell line were only marginally significant (p = 0.051), probably due to the low number of samples (three).

In the final model, the regression coefficient was reduced by 35% from 0.782 to 0.510 and was only marginally significant ( p = 0.051).

Mean epigenetic diversity across loci also differs in both measures, though this difference is only marginally significant for uh when using a p value cutoff of 0.05 (uh: Kruskal–Wallis, χ 2 3 = 7.769, P = 0.051; SD: Kruskal–Wallis, χ 2 3 = 36.543, P < 0.001, Fig. 2 C, D ).

Our mediation analysis further revealed that the association between age and optimism bias was mediated by negative learning rate (path ab: M = -0.02, SE = 0.01, z = -3.44, p < 0.001), and the association between age and optimism bias was substantially diminished and remained only marginally significant when accounting for negative learning rate (path c’: M = -0.04, SE = 0.02, z = -1.96, p = 0.051).