“only marginally significant”

In 2007, female beetles were heavier than males among insects collected from sunflower ( F (1,55) = 10.99, P = 0.002) but the difference was only marginally significant for insects collected from soybean ( F (1,61) = 3.93, P = 0.052) and adults of both sexes were significantly heavier when obtained from sunflower (males: F (1,50) = 244.12, P < 0.001; females: F (1,66) = 359.88, P < 0.001).

For nondepressive patients, only marginally significant decreases were revealed between baseline and follow-up, P =0.052, and premeasurement to post measurement, P =0.083, and follow-up, P =0.071 ( Figure 1 ).

Differently, RTs were faster for negative stimuli than for neutral stimuli, although this difference was only marginally significant ( t = −2.95; p = 0.052).

90%, p = 0.028), but only marginally significant for drug resistant strains (57% vs . 80%, p = 0.052).

At 28 DAI, the mean survival is reduced by 23.48 %, but this tendency is only marginally significant (Cox proportional hazards models for 28 DAI, treatment effect, χ 2 1 = 3.76, p = 0.052).

However, no significant difference was observed in the alpha band ( Mdn Robot = −0.001, Mdn Display = −0.019, U (39) = 151, p = 0.939), and the difference in the beta band was only marginally significant ( Mdn Robot = 0.003, Mdn Display = −0.004, U (39) = 273, p = 0.052). 3.4 Correlation between brain activity and language learning Children's learning performance on the post-interaction word recall test was slightly higher in the Robot group ( mdn = 0.839) as compared to the Display group ( mdn = 0.708), however this difference was not significantly different ( U = 146, p = 0.07).

In contrast, one set of analyses showed a positive association with diastolic BP of the 9-year-olds born to fish-eating women (p=0.021) but which was only marginally significant after adjustment for selenium (p=0.052).

A weak negative effect on specific phobias emerged (beta=−.24), which was only marginally significant ( p =.052).

Finally, the p -value for the interaction between the use of vitamin K epoxide reductase inhibitors at the baseline and the intervention group on the risk of developing a major adverse cardiovascular event was only marginally significant ( p = 0.052).

A linear regression controlling for participants’ political party affiliation (i.e., which of the 13 parties running in the coming elections they supported) revealed a significant effect of zero-sum beliefs on the avoidance of political conversations ( b = 0.23, 95% CI[0.01, 0.44], t (390) = 2.07, p = 0.039; Table 1 , Model 1), although the zero-order correlation was only marginally significant ( b = 0.21, 95% CI[−0.002, 0.42], t (403) = 1.95, p = 0.052).

This same pattern was evident for suicide plan and suicide attempt, though the ICR was smaller for these outcomes, and the ICR was only marginally significant (p = 0.052) for suicide attempt.

The annual average density decreased from 18,904.35 ± 2296.87 ind./L in the 2021 sampling cycle to 13,341.74 ± 1523.44 ind./L in the 2023 sampling cycle, but the difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.052).

However, after the correction, this relation remained only marginally significant ( p = 0.052).

Similarly, 22 participants (95.7%) showed decreased HB-S scores from 18.13 ± 9.03 to 15.39 ± 11.25, although this change was only marginally significant (Z = −2.06, p = 0.052).

The time required to capture the first prey item decreased substantially between the lowest and highest temperatures (19°C: 29.9±57.1 s, 24°C: 56.2±83.4 s, 29°C: 8.6±15.4 s; mean ± s.d.) although this relationship was not straightforward and was only marginally significant (GLM χ 2 = 5.92, d.f. = 2, P = 0.052).

The interaction of CONDITION * TIME remained significant, F (3, 704) = 6.32, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.03, but the interaction of TIME * BIDR-SDE was only marginally significant, F (1, 704) = 3.79, p = 0.052, η p 2 = 0.01.

The rmANOVA with a Greenhouse–Geisser correction showed that the main effect of resource amount on the acceptance rate was only marginally significant, F (1.277, 72.791) = 3.601, p = 0.052, η p 2 = 0.059 (Fig. 3 A; Supplementary Table S2 and S3 for further detail).

Such group difference was only marginally significant for Lesson 6 ( t (28) = 2.030, p = 0.052, d = 0.783) and not significant for Lesson 12 ( t (28) = 1.513, p = 0.141, d = 0.573).

Enlarged pelvic wall lymph nodes were also more commonly observed in the recurrent group, but the difference was only marginally significant ( p =0.052) ( Fig. 3 ).

samples, z = 5.50, p < .001 (this was only marginally significant in the Canadian sample, z = 1.63, p = .052).

This trend, however, was only marginally significant ( P = 0.052).

This association maintains its magnitude but loses statistical significance after adjusting for potential confounders (OR 2.0, p = 0.077). In the unadjusted model, men reporting threat or use of force during their most recent police stop have greater odds of current PTSD symptoms than men without perceived threat or use of force during their most recent police stop, although only marginally significant (OR 2.5, p = 0.052).

Unexpectedly, potted plants also had a greater increase in T leaf compared with free-rooted plants, albeit only marginally significant ( Q M = 3.77, p = 0.052; Fig. 5a ).

White women who had higher odds; younger women had higher odds of wanting a longer duration, as did women living in poverty (although this last finding was only marginally significant, at p = 0.052).

We found that the effect of total AQ score remained statistically significant ( P = 0.028) in the analysis of participants who reported their age ( n = 94), though it was only marginally significant ( P = 0.052) when missing values for this variable were replaced with the median to allow for analysis of a larger sample size ( n = 126).