“only marginally significant”

For the left UF, correlations between FA values and callous-unemotional trait ( r = −0.52, P = 0.071), between FA values and APSD ( r = −0.54, P = 0.055), and between MD values and SDQ ( r = −0.53, P = 0.074) were only marginally significant (uncorrected, P < 0.05) in CD males.

Besides the coefficient for MPF ML / C ., which is only marginally significant, all the others are significantly different from zero ( Length O : F [1, 38] = 5.62, p < 0.05; Range AP / C : F [1, 38] = 5.20, p < 0.05; MPF AP / O : F [1, 38] = 7.15, p < 0.02).

This relationship is not significant within housekeeping genes ( p = 0.2) and only marginally significant within testis-specific genes ( r 2 = 0.26, p = 0.05), although there is no significant difference in the regression slope estimate between these two groups, ( p = 0.66; Fig 2 ).

oleifera Taisha were only marginally significant ( t = 2.19; P < 0.05).

However, the effect of the refractive state was only marginally significant for older ages >40 years ( P ≥ .05) except for the age group “aged 40 to 49” (scotopic; P < .05). 3.3.

Both identification with the community and interpersonal contact were uniquely positively related to willingness to participate ( Table 2 ; Step 3c), yet interpersonal contact became only marginally significant ( p = 0.050) 6 .

STAS was also a significant prognostic factor for freedom from recurrence in univariate (P=0.010) and multivariate (P=0.024) analyses for the WR cases, but was only marginally significant for the segmentectomy cases (P=0.050, univariate analysis).

It shows that both the bNt and non-bNt HIV MAbs have long CDR-H3s; the difference between these two MAb groups was only marginally significant ( Table 1A ; unadjusted p = 0.0501), and not significant compared to the Bonferroni corrected value of 0.0018.

A significant difference in LA size of the lesion is observed (p = 0.0300), even if when calculated the entire volume of the lesion, the difference is only marginally significant (p = 0.0501).

Here, the diagnostic accuracy in the chain-of-thought group tends to be higher than in the standard output group but the improvement is only marginally significant ( P = 0.0504).

This analysis revealed a moderate effect for higher accuracy in the right hemisphere, although it was only marginally significant (two-tailed Wilcoxon sign-rank test; z = 1.95, p = 0.0507) v .

Including cardiorespiratory fitness (VO 2peak ) as covariate in the interaction analysis revealed significant activations in the same clusters as in the original model (except for the cluster peaking in the left supramarginal gyrus, which remained only marginally significant (p = 0.051)).

Differences in participants’ graduation were only marginally significant, χ 2 (1) = 0.52, p = .051.

Indeed, the 8.5 entrainment group showed a higher, albeit only marginally significant, TFR relative to the 11.5 Hz group (11.5 Hz group: mean = 0.32, SD = 0.12; 8.5 Hz group: mean = 0.39, SD = 0.13; t (58) = −2.00, p = 0.051).

Body weight gain (BWG) during days 1–21 tended to be higher in enzyme-supplemented groups compared with the control group; however, this difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.051).

However, these differences were only marginally significant (P=0.051, Figure 3A ).

Only marginally significant effects were shown on psychological distress ( t = -1.99, p = 0.051) and physical symptoms ( t = -1.83, p = 0.07) at 1-month follow-up.

livia , but both effects were only marginally significant ( p = 0.051 and p = 0.075, respectively; Table 3 ).

We also found a moderate positive relationship between Gas6 and EGFR post-treatment values, but the correlation was only marginally significant (r = 0.442, p = 0.051).

Multivariable analyses With the exception of β-HCH, all the studied POPs showed negative beta coefficients for serum REOH, that were only marginally significant for dicofol, so that those individuals with detectable dicofol concentrations showed lower levels of REOH in serum [exp(β) 0.703, p = 0.051] ( Table 3 ).

We observed that patients with the FF genotype had higher GH levels after treatment than patients with ff genotype, but the difference was only marginally significant ( P = 0.051).

The caudate volume was also lower in the Aβ+ group, but this difference was only marginally significant (p = 0.051).

However, in a linear-mixed effects model, this effect was only marginally significant ( t (25) = −2.05, p = 0.051), indicating strong differences in baseline reaction times overall between participants.

There were no statistically significant differences in call rates for arc chirps, tonal chirps, or upsweeps between seasons in Humboldt (Table 3 ); however, there tended to be a greater rate of trills in summer with a large effect size ( r = .52), although only marginally significant ( p = .051).

The interaction was only marginally significant (F (4,40) = 3.057, p = 0.051).