“only marginally significant”

Permutation testing for the pairwise comparisons showed that the number of overlaps was within the range expected by chance in the case of SZ (z-score = −0.59, p = 0.216; Figure S2d ) and ASD (z-score = 2.61, p = 0.062; Figure S2f ), and only marginally significant in the case of WS (z-score = 3.75, p = 0.049; Figure S2e ).

JA in infected Col-0 at 8 h was lower than in C24 at 8 h, reflecting the delay in the response in Col-0, although the difference was only marginally significant ( t -test, p = 0.049).

3 A , the estimate for the linear regression’s time variable coefficient is −0.013), but this decrease was only marginally significant ( P value = 0.0491).

Hospitals that employed a hospitalist in their organization had lower odds of top-box patient-experience outcomes, though this was only marginally significant for 2 domains (doctor always communicated well, AOR = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54-1.00; P = .0494, and patient always received help when desired, AOR = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.53-0.99; P = .0438).

Differences among the three groups are only marginally significant statistically ( p -value = 0.0495). 3.2.4.

However, the difference between harmonic distortion in displacement (mean, SD: 0.09, 0.04) versus rotation (mean, SD: 0.12, 0.04) was only marginally significant and of opposite sign (t = 2.309, df = 8, p = 0.0497) ( Table 1 and Supplement Table 1).

Finally, out of those who completed the double-blind trial, in the placebo arm 26 patients progressed out of 50 cases while in the tivozanib arm 23 patients progressed out of 58 - the difference between the two cohorts is only marginally significant by a chi-square test (P=0.0498, not reported by the authors).

There was only marginally significant variation among six periods in patients under 65 ( p = 0.0499), and multiple comparisons did not find the responsible seasons for the variation.

More specifically, cluster 2 were lower than HC, though it was only marginally significant ( p = 0.05).

Advanced disease stage (stage III/IV) was also a more frequent finding among exposed patients (77.8%) than among unexposed controls (55.7%) although it was only marginally significant ( P = 0.05).

Total protein intake and total nitrogen intake were inversely correlated with diet δ 15 N, although this correlation was only marginally significant (Spearman rank correlation: ρ= −0.59, P = 0.05, and ρ = 0.57, P = 0.07, respectively).

Correlation with disease stage was only marginally significant (P = 0.05).

Having a serious pregnancy complication is associated with higher quality of ANC, but this is only marginally significant (b = 0.22, p = 0.05).

Moreover, although only marginally significant, adjuvant chemotherapy was performed more on the preoperative sarcopenia group ( Table 1 , P = 0.05).

Whilst the semantic class of the image was related to classification accuracy, the raw meaning (as measured by the average semantic differential scores) was only marginally significant (all p >0.05).

Line B chickens graded as high or low using feed conversion, also differed moderately in the abundance of Firmicute s, although this difference was only marginally significant (p = 0.05).

reticulata , however, this difference is only marginally significant (median d S XY = 0.0045 in P. reticulata ; median d S XY = 0.0057 in P. wingei ; P = 0.05, Wilcoxon signed rank test).

3 ) whereas the reduction for MWW was only marginally significant (p = 0.05) ( Fig. 3 b). 3.4.

The optically measured oxCCO increase, however, was only marginally significant ( p = 0.05), and the oxCCO data were not directly associated with the LPR changes.

In our data parity and number of partners appeared most independent and, after adjusting for them, age at first intercourse was only marginally significant (P = 0.05).

However, the stationary phase origin reads relative to the termination site reads are only marginally significant ( p ~ 0.05).

Species was a highly significant predictor of ASV alpha diversity in the bees (χ 2 9 = 125.34, P < 0.001), while diet was only marginally significant after controlling for species (χ 2 2 = 5.98, P = 0.050).

The interaction between the reason condition, type of news, and platform was only marginally significant ( p = 0.050).

At higher concentrations (C6–C7), 3D cultures retained slightly higher viability (~10%–15%) than 2D, but the difference was only marginally significant at 72 h ( p < 0.05) and not at earlier time points.

Planned comparisons, which were directly encoded in the model, indicated faster response times for the humor compared to the control group, b = −22.0, SE = 8.86, t (95.0) = 2.49, p < 0.05, while the comparison of valid and invalid trials was only marginally significant, b = −3.72, SE = 1.89, t (94.3) = −1.97, p = 0.05.There was a tendency to respond faster to invalid trials.