“only marginally significant”

The only marginally significant difference is observed for ER between GN and GL, with a P-value P = 0.05.

Advanced disease stage (stage III/IV) was also a more frequent finding among exposed patients (77.8%) than among unexposed controls (55.7%) although it was only marginally significant ( P = 0.05).

found inverse associations, though only marginally significant associations of breastfeeding with the percentage of adipose tissue in the breast (β = − 0.55, p = 0.05) [ 20 ].

CD44v6 positivity also correlated with poor prognosis, although the trend was only marginally significant (OS: p = 0.050; EFS: P = 0.058, Figure 1 C and D).

Unilateral clubfoot had a slightly higher CIA, although the difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.05; effect size r = 0.40).

For all stimuli there was significant within-stimulus adaptation (except for the BY stimulus using the MDS-metric, which was only marginally significant: p < 0.05, uncorrected for multiple comparisons).

9) As in this study, a significant negative correlation was also found between lumbar BMD and vascular stiffness-measured by both AI and PWV-among obese African-American women (P=0.01); though the relationship was only marginally significant, vascular stiffness was also inversely proportional to the femoral neck BMD (P=0.05) and total hip BMD (P=0.06). 10) Frost et al. 21) found that PWV was significantly inversely proportional to femoral BMD but was not significantly correlated with lumbar BMD among postmenopausal women.

Having a serious pregnancy complication is associated with higher quality of ANC, but this is only marginally significant (b = 0.22, p = 0.05).

Furthermore, the TBS showed a highly significant correlation with BMD at the lumbar spine measured by REMS ( p > 0.001), but an only marginally significant one ( p = 0.05) with lumbar spine BMD measured by DXA (Fig. 2 ) [ 19 ].

While the main effect of synchrony was only marginally significant (F 1,352 = 3.9, p = 0.05), there was an interaction between synchrony and age group (F 1,352 = 7.7, p = 0.006).

In particular, the proportions were significantly higher for HIF1A and EIF5B compared to other genes, although the difference was only marginally significant ( P = 0.05; Permutation test; Fig. 4b ).

roxellana Host gender showed only marginally significant effects on the gut microbial alpha- and beta-diversity ( p = 0.05 − 0.1 in two-way PERMANOVA; Fig. 5 a − b and S3 a − c), while host age was significantly associated with gut microbial diversity indices ( p < 0.05 in both one-way and two-way PERMANOVA; Fig. 5 c − d and S3 d − f).

However, although the association between BMI and stroke was only marginally significant ( P > 0.05), the OR was greater than 1 in all models.

Correlation with disease stage was only marginally significant (P = 0.05).

The full model was significant for oral story production, F (4,28) = 5.38, p < .005, and only marginally significant for written story production, F (4,28) = 2.71, p = .05.

The interaction between Condition and Phase was only marginally significant, F (8,152) = 2.00, p = 0.050, η p = 0.095.

The interaction between the reason condition, type of news, and platform was only marginally significant ( p = 0.050).

Such a difference was also observed in men with MetS relative to those without MetS, though results were only marginally significant ( P = 0·050).

This interaction was only marginally significant at 500–700 ms ( p = 0.05).

Effects of steamed WB on postprandial blood variables In Experiment 2, mice fed the WB diet had significantly lower postprandial blood total GIP levels overall compared with mice fed the Control diet (Diet effect p < 0.05), although the difference (diet-by-time interaction) was only marginally significant ( p = 0.05; Figure 2(A )).

The group difference, however, was only marginally significant, t (198) = 1.97, p = .050, d = 0.28.

Both additive and multiplicative adjustments to correct weights of lambs born and reared as single lambs to a twin-lamb basis were larger for yearling, 2-year-old, and aged dams than for adult dams (Table 3 ), but, in general, differences among additive factors were only marginally significant (e.g., P = 0.05 for 2-year-old versus adult dams) and differences among dam age classes in multiplicative factors were at most equal to 0.04.

Statistical tests were two-tailed for all analyses with a conservative significance level at p < 0.01 to account for multiple statistical testing (p < 0.05 was considered only marginally significant).

The improvement of the median completion times of LT placement and cricothyrotomy was significant between Sessions 1 and 2 ( P = 0.005 and P = 0.04, respectively), whereas improvement of completion time of BMV was only marginally significant ( P = 0.05) (Fig. 2 ). 3.2.

The PAT ratio for CAD was only 0.62, with the number of observed transferable loci (13%) lower than the expected number (21%), although this difference was only marginally significant (binomial p -value = 0.05; one-sided and not adjusted for the multiple comparisons).