Barely Significant
← all phrases

“only marginally significant”

5,077 sentences · 5,077 papers · 5,448 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<1.0p=0.9

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

only marginally significantP value = 0.0481.0× alphagold
Both the DASH diet and MIND diet score demonstrated an association with systolic blood pressure (SBP), although the association between the DASH diet and SBP was only marginally significant, the MIND diet had a significant association with SBP (OR = 1.012 (CI 95%=1.000- 1.025) P value = 0.048, and OR = 1.097 (CI 95%=1.037–1.159) P value = 0.001 respectively).
only marginally significantp = 0.0491.0× alphagold
Are studies with broader conclusions associated with higher citation impact ? Overall, generalized articles ( Mean rank = 279.27) were associated with higher impact (normalized citation count) than restricted articles ( Mean rank = 252.90), although the difference was only marginally significant ( U = 31843.00, z =—1.97, p = 0.049, r =—0.10).
only marginally significantP = 0.0491.0× alphagold
8 In the FREEDOM study, the benefit with CABG over PCI for all-cause death at 5 years was only marginally significant ( P = 0.049), 4 however, considering that the trial was not powered for all-cause death, this result could be considered hypothesis-generating. 15 In the FREEDOM Follow-On study, 16 which extended follow-up in 943 of the original 1900 patients cohort, the estimated rate of mortality at 8 years was 23.7% and 18.7% in the PCI-DES and CABG group, respectively (unadjusted HR: 1.32, 95% CI: 0.97, 1.78, P = 0.076), with the HR remaining unchanged after adjustment.
only marginally significantp = 0.0491.0× alphagold
Consequently, the findings suggested that the positive effect of abusive supervision at T1 on emotional exhaustion at T2 was stronger at lower levels of self-compassion ( β = 0.488; p = 0.000), moderate at medium levels of self-compassion ( β = 0.344; p = 0.000), and weaker (only marginally significant) at higher levels of self-compassion at T1 ( β = 0.156; p = 0.049).
only marginally significantp = 0.0491.0× alphagold
Correlation between morphologic (MR and CT) and metabolic (PET) scores The bronchiectasis score, as calculated on both HRCT and MR, significantly correlated with the PET MIV ( p = 0.03, r s =0.56 [95%CI 0.08 to 0.83] and p = 0.009, r s =0.64 [95%CI 0.19 to 0.86] respectively), while the correlation with the PET SUV mean was only marginally significant ( p = 0.049, r s =0.5 [95%CI −0.008 to 0.86] and p = 0.06, r s =0.49 [95%CI −0.03 to 0.80] respectively) Tree-in-bud score, as calculated on HRCT but not on MR scans, significantly correlated with MIV ( p = 0.03, r s =0.56 [95%CI 0.07 to 0.83]).
only marginally significantp = 0.0491.0× alphagold
No significant difference was observed concerning the patient body index mass ( p = 0.384), blood group ( p = 0.403), presentation ( p = 0.322), AVM size ( p = 0.585), grading ( p = 0.403), location ( p = 0.944), hemorrhage ( p = 0.629), duration of surgery ( p = 0.756), blood loss ( p = 0.237), arterial blood supply ( p = 0.099), recurrent rate ( p = 0.706), or follow-up ( p = 0.677), and the difference in duration of hospital stay was only marginally significant ( p = 0.049).
only marginally significantP = .0491.0× alphagold
Perceived effectiveness of PHW labels by sex, educational level, and income Label 8 (pregnant woman) was the only label for which ratings differed by sex ( P = .009)—women found it more effective than men—or by educational level, and even then only marginally significant ( P = .049).