“of marginal significance”

There were no between-group differences in clinical features (all P -values>0.05), whereas the difference in the incidence of severe debility was of marginal significance (18.1% vs 5.6%, P =0.077).

The difference in PCSK-9 was of marginal significance ( P = 0.078), as detailed in Table 4 . 3.5.

In addition, a multiple regression revealed that preference for diversity was in the predicted direction (associated positively with liberal ideology), but the effect was tiny and only of marginal significance ( p = 0.078) (see Table 1 ).

Stratification based on the baseline CD4 + T-cell counts revealed an effect of marginal significance on the efficacy of TDF-containing regimens [Q(1) = 3.095, p = 0.078, 200 or more cells/μl vs. fewer than 200 cells/μl: 0.039 95% CI: 0.015–0.098 vs. 0.094 95% CI (0.026–0.218)].

In particular, for the group with proven CRBSI, post hoc analysis showed that the 25% elevation of marginal significance (p = 0.078) of PCT from D-4 to D-3, was followed by a stepwise statistically significant increase from D-3 to D0 (100% from D-3 to D-2, p = 0.006; 50% from D-2 to D-1, p < 0.001; 927% from D-1 to D0, p < 0.001).

However, probably owing to high environmental variation the P -value was only of marginal significance ( P =0.08), although we still consider this to be relevant as it is typical for such agricultural reproductive traits.

Consequently, within day analysis on infusions was investigated and Day 4 was of marginal significance (F4,38 = 2.2, P = 0.08) and Day 5 significant (F4,38 = 2.8, P = 0.04).

Corresponding correlations for both absolute indicators are lower, and one is of marginal significance in girls, respectively, 0.32 ( p = 0.08) and 0.18.

DUT was significantly associated with smoking (p = 0.01), HELZ was of marginal significance with alcohol (p = 0.08), and although smokers had lower HELZ expression than never smokers as with RNAseq, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.34).

Setting of intervention explained some heterogeneity for the alcohol per unit time outcome at the first time of marginal significance (residual I 2 =49%, Wald p=0.08).

Mean endogenous (non-GnRH-stimulated) LH was definitively decreased by the high-fat diet but the effect on mean endogenous FSH was of marginal significance ( P = 0.08).

An independent-sample t -test of mean differences in diversity pros between the abstract ( M = 4.36, SD = 2.19) and concrete ( M = 3.87, SD = 1.71) construal conditions confirmed the expectation that individuals generated more pros at a more abstract level of construal, at a level of marginal significance, in support of Hypothesis 3a, t (192) = 1.74, p = 0.08, d = 0.25.

Moreover, the interaction was of marginal significance (P = 0.08; Supplementary Figure S4 , available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100578 ) with respect to tumor location.

While the effect of stress on Openness dropped to levels of marginal significance ( b = −0.12, SE = 0.07, 95% CI [−0.26, 0.01], t = −1.76, p = 0.08), it became non-significant for Extraversion ( b = −0.05, SE = 0.07, 95% CI [−0.18, 0.09], t = −0.68, p = 0.50).

The activities of the bilateral sgACC (BA 25) exhibited negative correlations of marginal significance with the percentage improvements in NRS tinnitus perception for the beta 3 frequency band ( P = 0.08) ( Figure 2 ).

In addition, stage II-IV TETs showed a higher PD-L1 (SP142) TPS expression compared to the stage I TETs (Mann–Whitney U test, p = 0.001, Figure 5 ), while advanced-stage (III/IV) TETs were more frequently characterized by a zero IC-score compared to low-stage (I/II) TETs, although this correlation was of marginal significance (Fischer’s exact test, p = 0.083, 22.7% for stage III/IV versus 8.5% for stage I/II, Figure 6 ).

An association of marginal significance was also evident in Kaplan–Meier survival curves with MB (p = 0.084, Fig. 1 c) but not thrombosis (Fig. 1 d, p = 0.344).

Schizotypal symptoms when not intoxicated The regression model with predictors of COMT and AKT1 genotype, cannabis dependence, years of cannabis use, adjusting for gender and ethnicity was of marginal significance ( R 2 =0.03, F(7,364)=1.87, P =0.085).

These differences were of marginal significance (p = 0.085) (Figure 2 ).

The interaction between year of prescription and age category was of marginal significance (p = 0.0855), which suggests that increases in fluoroquinolone use were similar across age groups.

Total energy intake was higher in the vigorous PA group than in the no exercise group, with a trend of marginal significance after adjustment for age in both men and women ( P = 0.086 and P = 0.081, respectively).

Regarding the specific symptoms of RQLQ, total pollen counts were positively correlated with a practical problem (r = 0.585, p = 0.046) and activity (r = 0.635, p = 0.026) and negatively correlated with emotion (r = -0.593, p = 0.042); correlations of marginal significance were observed with sleep (r = -0.516, p = 0.086), nasal (r = 0.545, p = 0.067), and eye symptoms (r = 0.538, p = 0.071).

Unlike the occipitoparietal ROI, the hemisphere X spatial certainty interaction was only of marginal significance [ F (2,26) = 2.65; P = 0.089], due to a trend towards increasingly lateralized alpha-band activity as spatial certainty increased [linear contrast: F (1,13) = 4.46; P = 0.055].

Two more were of marginal significance: venous dimension with the log of WM hyperintensities (β = 0.27, p = 0.09) and arterial dimension with subcortical volume (β = 0.19, p = 0.06).

While no interaction terms in any racial/ethnic group for fiber or carbohydrate intake were significant at P < 0.05, the interaction term for fiber and GRS among non-Hispanic whites was of marginal significance ( P = 0.09; Table 3 ).