While no interaction terms in any racial/ethnic group for fiber or carbohydrate intake were significant at P < 0.05, the interaction term for fiber and GRS among non-Hispanic whites was of marginal significance ( P = 0.09; Table 3 ).
A similar trend was observed for Hispanic participants, although only of marginal significance (RRR = 1.25, p = 0.09).
In both left and right ROIs, there was a group difference of marginal significance in the strength of the linear association across loads (group by linear contrast interaction: left caudate F = 3.02, df = 1, 42, p = 0.09: right caudate: F = 2.91, df = 1, 42, p = 0.095).
A medium effect, albeit of marginal significance, in favor of the UT group immediately after the training was found for two far transfer tasks: story recall, F (1,39) = 3.09, p = 0.09, MSE = 11.04, η p 2 = 0.07, and RAPM, F (1,39) = 2.73, p = 0.10, MSE = 4.27, η p 2 = 0.07 ( Figure 5 ).
Decreases in spleen enlargement were also observed, although the trend was of marginal significance (p = 0.091).
Immunohistochemical cytoplasmic LC3b expression was detected in non-B3-type thymomas and thymic carcinomas, but this association was of marginal significance (Fischer’s exact test, non-B3/TC WHO histological type versus B3/TC, p = 0.098) ( Table 2 ).
Other landscape indices (MPS and MSI) showed a negative relationship with the respondent’s HRQOL, but only of marginal significance (0.05 < p < 0.1).
The perturbations significantly altered bacterial composition (PERMANOVA; p < 0.05) in fewer than 50% of the locations (11 of 26 locations), although if locations of marginal significance are included ( p < 0.1), this number increases to 60% (16 of 26 locations, table 2 ).
Trends of marginal significance were indicated by p -values < 0.10.
All differences were considered statistically significant at P < .05 and the definition of marginal significance is that .05 < P < .1.
of an exponentially truncated power law compared to lognormal and stretched exponential distributions for both evoked and rest: LLR truncPL_Lognormal > 4 * 10 1 , p < 10 −3 , LLR stretched_Lognormal > 10 1 , p < 10 −21 , LLR truncPL_stretched > 10 1 , (p < 10 −3 , with the exception of two segments of marginal significance p < 0.1, and two non-significant segments.
Variables were retained for final multivariable models if they were either at least of marginal significance ( p -value < 0.10) or played a confounding role (the variable had a noticeable impact > 10% change on the effect estimate).
Osr1-KO embryos showed significantly reduced Smo and increased Ihh expression ( p < 0.05), with elevated Shh and Gli1 levels of marginal significance ( p < 0.1) (Fig. 7C ).
Further, we accepted an additional level of marginal significance at p≤0.1 because of the low number of study sites.
Although no controversial conclusions were reported in the studies on miR-375, miR-128a, miR-194a, our study seemed to further indicate the necessity of meta-analysis because the association of miR-194a rs3820455 seemed to be of marginal significance ( P < .1) when two studies were combined, not P > .1 as described in individual studies.
The association between gambling debts and DSM-IV was only of marginal significance ( β = 0.81, se = 0.47, p = 0.10).
While LC/MS-MS peptide data identification of this protein was of marginal significance ( p < 0.1), the gene encoding Tnfaip8l2 was also weakly upregulated in lung tissue by seven d.p.i.
In general areas, having a small seedbank due to weed control every year, differences of marginal significance (P < 0.1) were only found in 2016 ( Table 4 ).
Stratified analyses found that while girls in the treatment arm experienced a one-third relative reduction in risk for arrest for violent and property crime (p<0.05), boys experienced a non-significant decrease in arrest for violent crime and a 33% relative increase in property crime (both of marginal significance, p<0.10). 28 The intervention effect attenuated with time, possibly because families later moved back to their original neighborhood. 71 Secondary Prevention We found more literature on interventions targeting secondary prevention of incarceration.
However, when baseline differences in health status were controlled for using multiple linear regression, these differences by enrollment status were only of marginal significance ( p = .10).
This result was of marginal significance for OSDI, DEQ5, and NPSI-E ( P <0.1) and significant for evoked pain to wind ( P <0.05).
The changes in guilt (20, ES = 0.45) and depression (21, ES = 0.39) symptoms reached a level of marginal significance ( p < 0.10).
We specifically differentiated cases of marginal significance ( p < 0.1) and cases where the p value was below 0.05.
Adjusted for the background factors, multiple linear regression analysis found that perceived response efficacy and perceived self-efficacy were significantly and positively associated with compliance with BG4PA ( p <0.05), while the associations between perceived severity/perceived susceptibility and compliance were of marginal significance (0.05< p <0.10).
The three-way interaction was of marginal significance ( p = 0.107), though the model with confounders fitted to boys and girls separately showed a significant anxiety × stroking interaction for girls ( p < 0.001) but not boys ( p = 0.489).