“of marginal significance”

The increase of BCs is of marginal significance ( P -value = 0.068).

4C), while the relative expression level of TGIF2 was of marginal significance (P=0.0683; data not shown).

In accordance with the positive association between higher LDL-C and TP volume, total cholesterol exhibited a trend of marginal significance towards positive association with the latter (r=+0.263, p=0.069), whereas HDL-C pointed to the opposite direction, as expected (r=-0.277, p=0.054).

Scores on self-compassion (SCS-CZ scale) demonstrated an interaction of marginal significance between the intervention conditions and time points ( F (2, 134) = 2.79, p = 0.07, η 2 = 0.01).

A similar effect was also noted in patients with high CD31+ VD (using the median VD as a cutoff point), but the difference was of marginal significance ( Figure 3C ; P =0.07).

A medium-size main group effect existed on a level of marginal significance ( F (1, 45) = 3.42, p = 0.07, η 2 p = 0.07), suggesting an overall lower level of everyday stress in the VSD group (see Figure 2 b).

The result of the regression of lexicality effect showed that EWR significantly positively predicted the size of lexicality effect, Β = −0.24, 95% CI , − 0.43– − 0.04, p < .05, while age showed a negative prediction, although at the level of marginal significance, Β = 0.17, 95% CI , − 0.01 – 0.37, p = .07.

Poultry was modestly related to a reduction in the risk of type 2 DM for normal weight and overweight participants, but was unrelated to the risk of type 2 DM in obese participants and the interaction factor was of marginal significance (P=0.07).

Multivariate analysis within the HypoARC group of patients showed that only high MVD had an independent predictive role of local relapse, although of marginal significance ( P =0.07, t -ratio 1.86).

Of marginal significance, medical students receiving only the PowerPoint lecture also had higher self-efficacy levels on counseling STI prevention (t (46) =1.828, p=.07).Students receiving both lectures had significantly higher self-efficacy levels discussing confidentiality with adolescents (t (35) =-2.543, p=.02) at the end of the pediatric clerkship.

The student’s independent-samples t -test, by assessing the changes (i.e., post-task–pre-task) on each dimension and on the total scale of the SOFI, showed that they were of statistical significance between groups when looking at sleepiness [ t (19) = 2.10; p = 0.05; η 2 = 0.188] as well as of marginal significance in total fatigue [ t (19) = 1.89; p = 0.07; η 2 = 0.159].

Rehospitalization Events, Life Expectancy Prognosis, Burden of Symptoms and Health-Related Quality of Life at 10-Year Follow-Up The numbers of rehospitalizations due to heart failure were higher in the control group than the G-CSF group, however, this was of marginal significance in the analysis ( p = 0.070), with an overall incidence of 2.9% ( Figure 4 A).

A negative old/new effect for Brief objects was evident for the left posterior cluster (−0.93 mV on average, p = 0.01), whereas the old/new effect for Long objects for the same cluster was positive and of marginal significance (+0.82 mV on average, p = 0.07).

Despite the low number of cases, a similar double-stratification analysis in stage III patients showed that patients who lacked CA9 expression and FOXP3+ lymphocytes had a better prognosis, although of marginal significance ( p = 0.07, Fig. 3b ).

In contrast, the pattern for women was not clear.[ 22 ] Data from 8213 participants showed a statistically significant direct association between BMI and the odds of non-advanced adenomas ( P < 0.001) and proximal neoplasia ( P < 0.001), while the relation for advanced adenomas was of marginal significance ( P < 0.07) and no relation for distal neoplasia ( P < 0.85).[ 23 ] Individuals younger than 50, eating a balanced diet and BMI <25 Kg/m 2 with no metabolic condition are at a 15% lower risk of CRC.[ 24 ] In a Canadian study, alcohol was associated with a higher risk of CRC (OR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.2–4.0) among obese participants (BMI ≥30) relative to the non-alcohol obese.

Allele size variance ( V ) displayed a positive correlation of marginal significance with the year of first observation and with geographic distance from Belgrade, in the western transect (Spearman's r = 0.65 and P = 0.07 for both tests), but not in the eastern transect (Spearman's r ≤ 0.33 and P ≥ 0.35) ( Fig. 3C,D ).

ITIH4, but not APRI or FIB-4, had a significant direct correlation with fibrosis stage ( P = 0.015, 0.961, and 0.389, resp.), whereas, the negative correlation of ITIH4 with HCV viremia was of marginal significance ( P = 0.071).

Although the risk of late recurrence was higher in patients with WFA + -M2BP levels >2.14 compared to those with WFA + -M2BP levels ≤2.14, the association was of marginal significance ( P =0.072).

14 Time 2 For implicit measures, the weighted aggregate effect sizes (see Table 5 ) were significant for Test 1 but were only of marginal significance for Test 2 ( p = .072).

The occurrence of locoregional recurrence was significantly related to the disease stage ( p = 0.002), whereas the relationship with age was only of marginal significance ( p = 0.075; higher age had a lower hazard).

Multivariate analyses showed that dose painting was a significant independent prognostic factor for 3-year LFFS and DFS ( P = 0.039 and P = 0.036, respectively); EBV DNA concentration was a significant independent prognostic factor for 3-year LFFS, DFS, DMFS and OS ( P = 0.022, P < 0.001, P = 0.003 and P = 0.003, respectively), and dose painting was of marginal significance in predicting DMFS and OS ( P = 0.075, P = 0.052, respectively).

Screening of maternal sera with p305 (α 1G ) and with p330 (α 1H ) indicated a tendency for the CHB + and CHB − groups to have differential reactivity for the peptides, although these results were of marginal significance (p = 0.075 and 0.184 for p305/α 1G and p330/α 1H , respectively).

Analysis of the RT data, displayed in Figure 4 , revealed a non-significant main effect of rTMS ( F 1(1, 15) = 0.51, p = 0.486; F 2(1, 78) = 0.81, p = 0.371) and a main effect of typicality reliable by participants but not by items ( F 1(1, 15) = 5.48, p = 0.033; F 2(1, 78) = 0.78, p = 0.389), which were qualified by an reliable interaction between the two, albeit it of marginal significance by participants ( F 1(1, 15) = 3.67 , p = 0.075; F 2(1, 78) = 9.99, p = 0.002).

In particular, for the outcome after 12 months, the decreased OR of decaffeinated coffee drinkers reached the level of marginal significance (OR of drinkers, 0.26; 95% CI: 0.06-1.15; P =0.076).

In addition, boys were 48% more likely to be diagnosed compared to girls, although the higher proportion was of marginal significance (OR = 1.48, 95% CI: 0.96–2.30; P = .0764).