Barely Significant
← all phrases

“not fully significant”

50 sentences · 50 papers · 222 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.085

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

not fully significantp = 0.0521.0× alphagold
Checks for spurious effects with Oldham’s method confirmed validity for the correlation with reading accuracy in L-types (especially with text reading accuracy: r = −0.528, p = 0.052, whereas other components were not fully significant) and with reading speed in P-types (for all components: r ≤ −0.339, p ≤ 0.024), but not for word reading accuracy (r = −0.022, p = 0.887).
not fully significantp = 0.0571.1× alphagold
Interestingly, Mann–Whitney post-hoc analysis showed a significant increase of the trust scores assigned to the untrustworthy faces in the SM condition (Mdn = 30%, 95%CI [27.5, 30]) compared to the NM condition (Mdn = 20%, 95%CI [15, 25]) ( U = 429, p < 0.001, r = 0.41) and, albeit not fully significant, to the TM one (Mdn = 20%, 95%CI [20, 30]) ( U = 636, p = 0.057, r = 0.21) – indicating that untrustworthy faces are rated as “less untrustworthy” when wearing TM and, even less, when wearing SM.
In the PLS-PM models ( Figure 3 ), the path coefficient for the environmental factor on female vegetative growth is −0.400 with a p -value of 0.08, which is close to the significance threshold of 0.05, suggesting a potential negative impact of the environment on vegetative growth, though this effect is not fully significant.