“not clearly significant”

In this case, the enrichment of genes containing a TC-box in their promoters among the positives is not clearly significant (p = 0.031).

When controlling for social anxiety, VWMC was marginally correlated with the spatial-blink effect under the goal-relevant distractor condition, but was not clearly significant, r = -0.31, p = 0.059.

A longer duration of tendon symptomatology, even if not clearly significant ( p = 0.06), was observed in subjects with diabetes.

95%: 0.96–3.47), however this result is not clearly significant (p = 0.06).

The difference in accumulation rates between the virulent Mahoney and attenuated Sabin 1 strains were not clearly significant.

We also found that chicken was the major reservoir for campylobacteriosis in young children living in urban areas compared with their rural counterparts, for which cattle seemed to be more important, although the difference for cattle was not clearly significant (data not shown).

It is important to note that the differences between T and B cell populations were not clearly significant, which confirms a previous study by Horn et al., supporting their conclusion that “for biodosimetry this makes analyzing individual subsets unnecessary” 16 .

For rectal cancer (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.95–1.31) and pancreatic cancer (OR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.00–1.19), the effect estimates approached statistical significance but were not clearly significant.

Although the results are slightly better when using more modalities as input (as in Motion,Image → Sound in comparison to Motion → Sound or Image → Sound), the improvement in performance is not clearly significant in the experiment.

While the bimane label at site 243 does show a small amount of quenching by the R175E mutant in Figure 4 b, which might reflect some slight quenching by Y67 on arrestin, the difference is not clearly significant.

In the topological properties of the network taking into account punctuation marks, here expressed by the distributions of degree P ( k ) and local clustering coefficient C ( k ) , the changes are not clearly significant.

The differences found when comparing HepG2 and A431 EV counts ( P = 0.84, Mann-Whitney), D17 and S2R+ counts ( P = 0.057, Mann-Whitney) and all four cell lines ( P = 0.044, Kruskal-Wallis) were not clearly significant ( Figure S1 ).

Simply adding demographic information (DemoP) rather than linguistic cues (LingP) was not clearly significant, and demographic-only (DemoP) vs. combined (CompP) was borderline.

The main findings of the MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) study concluded that there was no effect of an LPD (i.e., 0.58 g/kg/day) on reducing CKD progression and that a VLPD had a slightly but not clearly significant effect on reducing the decline in GFR levels vs. higher dietary protein intake (i.e., 1.3 g/kg/day).

Levels of WBC, CRP, d ‐dimer, and troponin (not clearly significant) during the first week of hospital admission differed between families that lost more than one member and the control group (Figure 7 ).

The expression levels of chondrogenic and osteogenic genes were higher in the HT groups than those in the control group, although the effects of HT temperature (41 or 44oC) on gene expression were not clearly significant (Fig. 4 g, j).

Net reclassification revealed that the model with CT-AC significantly reclassified 20% of FFR <0.82 and <0.84, and 25% of FFR ≥0.82 and ≥0.84 predicted based on the model without CT-AC (Table 4 A and B), whereas differences were not clearly significant at other FFR cut-offs.

In the same way, the different cooperage treatments are not clearly significant for this ratio.

Discussion In the present study, we found weak correlations between higher NT-proBNP levels and lower scores on the HADS anxiety scale at baseline and after 12 months, which were, however, not clearly significant.

Under the random effects model, the results were similar although differences between "AA" and "AB" genotype groups were not clearly significant for NBA and TNB.

The fact that this difference is not clearly significant may depend on the small number of PC patient samples analyzed, due to the rarity of this disease.

This is not clearly significant in the traditional Cox analysis, where the according HRs are 2.40 and 2.08, respectively.

EMG was considered as normal; however, EMG was done early after apparition of symptoms and it explored distal limb part, which could render this result not clearly significant [ 3 ].

However, the effect was small and not clearly significant in view of multiple testing.

However, studies for antiarrhythmic prophylaxis with these drugs suffer from small-sized populations, not clearly significant results, and that the patients experienced side effects [ 80 , 81 ].