We also found that chicken was the major reservoir for campylobacteriosis in young children living in urban areas compared with their rural counterparts, for which cattle seemed to be more important, although the difference for cattle was not clearly significant (data not shown).
← all phrases
“not clearly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.08
In the literature
Changes in FA from baseline suggest that the implanted regions at year 2 have larger FA increases compared with the whole-brain, but by year 5 the differences between implant and whole-brain FA values were not clearly significant.
EMG was considered as normal; however, EMG was done early after apparition of symptoms and it explored distal limb part, which could render this result not clearly significant [ 3 ].
In contrast, any medication, insulin, metformin, and DPP4 inhibitors were not clearly significant factors for PFS.
Again their differences to neighboring genotypes (e.g., Mexican CIMMYT durum cultivars) were not clearly significant.
However, studies for antiarrhythmic prophylaxis with these drugs suffer from small-sized populations, not clearly significant results, and that the patients experienced side effects [ 80 , 81 ].
(2025) reported that each 1-SD increase in PhenoAge was associated with 75% higher odds of NAFLD defined by FLI ≥60 (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.19–2.58), the strongest association among four aging measures examined; AL and HD showed more modest positive associations, whereas KDM-BA was weaker and not clearly significant. 32 In pooled NHANES 1999–2018, Wu et al.
The expression levels of chondrogenic and osteogenic genes were higher in the HT groups than those in the control group, although the effects of HT temperature (41 or 44oC) on gene expression were not clearly significant (Fig. 4 g, j).
In the same way, the different cooperage treatments are not clearly significant for this ratio.
There were very mild alterations in globulin levels and female liver weights (1 mg/kg/day of H-IPSE) that were not clearly significant.
We observe no significant improvement in the Random and Median treatments ( p 0 = 0.28 and 0.44, respectively), and a marginal improvement in the Shifted-Median treatment, although not clearly significant ( p 0 = 0.06; see Fig S top row in S1 Appendix ).
Although the results are slightly better when using more modalities as input (as in Motion,Image → Sound in comparison to Motion → Sound or Image → Sound), the improvement in performance is not clearly significant in the experiment.
Although adenocarcinoma usually presents at a higher stage than conventional urothelial carcinoma (72% versus 52% muscle invasive cases, respectively), survival differences are not clearly significant [6] .
Levels of WBC, CRP, d ‐dimer, and troponin (not clearly significant) during the first week of hospital admission differed between families that lost more than one member and the control group (Figure 7 ).
Discussion In the present study, we found weak correlations between higher NT-proBNP levels and lower scores on the HADS anxiety scale at baseline and after 12 months, which were, however, not clearly significant.
There were not clearly significant differences in CD44 and SLC7A11, whereas CAV1 was not detected in this dataset ( Fig. 7A ).
While the bimane label at site 243 does show a small amount of quenching by the R175E mutant in Figure 4 b, which might reflect some slight quenching by Y67 on arrestin, the difference is not clearly significant.
Salivary sIgA (mg/g saliva) declined over time in the placebo group, whereas reductions were less pronounced in probiotic-treated infants, although between-group differences were not clearly significant.
However, the effect was small and not clearly significant in view of multiple testing.
In the topological properties of the network taking into account punctuation marks, here expressed by the distributions of degree P ( k ) and local clustering coefficient C ( k ) , the changes are not clearly significant.
Vaessen et al.’s meta‐analysis of microcredit and women's control over household spending found only a small positive and not clearly significant effect among medium risk‐of‐bias studies (SMD = 0.069, 95% CI [−0.003, 0.141]), and no effect among the low‐risk experimental studies, leading them to conclude that overall there was no evidence for a significant effect.
Thus, while there are not clearly significant differences among the four pheromone lure preparations, there is reason to recommend that the four-component, 2-mg lure remain a standard.
• CDC Contaminant : Present in enrichment broth only and organism consistent with skin flora and a not clearly significant organism (e.g., Coagulase negative Staphylococci [CNS], Diphtheroid, Alpha-hemolytic Streptococci, Bacillus sp. non-cereus). • 16S rRNA gene PCR Positive : ≥ 1+ band positive and organism identified by sequencing, or ≥ 1+ electrophoresis gel band positive and positive on repeat PCR. • 16S rRNA gene PCR Contaminant : 1+ electrop-horesis gel band positive only and negative on repeat PCR testing.