Barely Significant
← all phrases

“nominally significant”

7,733 sentences · 7,733 papers · 10,034 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.08

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

nominally significantp < 0.00010.0× alphagold
Nominally significant decreased DCM risk was found to be associated with the A allele and AT genotype of rs2505568 (OR: 0.48, 95% CI = 0.35–0.67, p < 0.0001 and OR: 0.44, 95% CI = 0.31–0.62, p < 0.0001, respectively), but it should be interpreted with caution because of Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium in the control group.
nominally significantP < 1 × 10 −40.0× alphagold
Here, despite the sample size limitation, we observed consistent GO or disease enrichments using different web-based tools or different gene lists, indicating that the nominally significant findings ( P < 1 × 10 −4 ) and the coexpressed genes with GRIA4 are robustly related to the ND+MD trait.
nominally significantP =1 × 10 −40.0× alphagold
This GWAS showed nominally significant association of rs1006737 located in intron 3 of CACNA1C ( P =1 × 10 −4 ) with BD. 5 Subsequently, a larger GWAS with 4387 BD cases and 6209 controls, including overlapping samples from the first study, further supported the association of rs1006737, now reaching borderline genome-wide significance
nominally significantp < 0.00010.0× alphagold
Given this lack of statistical significance in hierarchical testing, adjusted mean changes from baseline in total lesion volume on T2-weighted (T2W) images at 12 months and 24 months in the siponimod group were considered nominally significant versus placebo (both timepoints p < 0.0001) (Table 1 ), with the adjusted average mean increase from baseline over both timepoints lower in the siponimod than placebo group (183.9 vs 879.2 mm 3 ; nominal p < 0.0001) [ 38 ].
nominally significantp < 1e−40.0× alphagold
When quantifying the number of samples that are not heterozygous for a known eQTL but still show allelic imbalance, gene-level haplotypic expression levels were excluded for a sample if the individual was heterozygous for a top significant eQTL or a nominally significant (permutation p < 1e−4) independent eQTL in any of the 49 tissues.
nominally significantp value <1 × 10 −040.0× alphagold
Aggregating results from several large-scale cis-eQTL studies across tissues 9 , 34 , we found that 12 of the 59 of the (enrichment p value = 2.8 × 10 −05 ) novel genes have nominally significant ( p value <1 × 10 −04 ) evidence of cis-regulatory SNPs to be associated with SCZ or other different neuropsychiatric diseases.
nominally significantp = 1.0E−040.0× alphagold
Pathway analyses conducted on nominally significant targets showed that genes associated with BD and BMI were enriched for the Neuronal cell body Gene Ontology (GO) term ( p = 1.0E−04; false discovery rate (FDR) = 0.025) and different pathways, including the Signaling by Hedgehog pathway ( p = 4.8E−05, FDR = 0.02), while genes associated with BD and T2D showed no specific enrichment.
nominally significantP < 1.00 × 10 − 40.0× alphagold
3 , 12 Among the 32 nominally significant gene-based associations ( P < 1.00 × 10 − 4 ), six (18.75%) were issued from a missense|LC (i.e., low-confidence LoF variants) burden set, 19 (59.38%) were issued from a pLoF burden set, and seven (21.88%) were issued from a synonymous burden set ( Supplementary Figure S1 ).
nominally significantP = 1.13 × 10 −40.0× alphagold
In the current study, we demonstrate nominally significant hypermethylation at both loci (Fig. 4 a: cg05066959: ∆ = 13.10, P = 1.13 × 10 −4 and Fig. 4 b: cg11823178: ∆ = 9.39, P = 5.48 × 10 −5 ), in parallel with a nominally significant decrease in uC (cg11823178: ∆ = − 5.03, P = 1.19 × 10 −3 ; cg05066959: ∆ = − 9.06, P = 1.18 × 10 −4 ), and a nominally significant decrease in 5hmC at cg11823178 (∆ = − 4.36, P = 0.02), with a non-significant decrease in 5hmC at cg05066959 ( ∆ = − 4.04, P = 0.14).
nominally significant−log(p) = 3.840.0× alphagold
For 10 out of 29 brain regions a nominally significant relationship could be observed: Right Hippocampus (rho = 0.86, −log(p) = 3.84), Brainstem (rho = 0.85, −log(p) = 3.56), left Hippocampus (rho = 0.84, −log(p) = 3.41), left Basal Ganglia vessels (rho = 0.82, −log(p)= 2.90), left Choroid Plexus (rho = 0.73, −log(p) = 2.05), right Basal Ganglia vessels (rho = 0.69, −log(p) = 1.86), right ventral Diencephalon (rho = 0.65, −log(p) = 1.56), right Caudate (rho = 0.64, −log(p) = 1.56), right Accumbens area (rho = 0.61, −log(p) = 1.41), and right Amygdala (rho = 0.60, −log(p) = 1.32) (Table 2 and Figure 3A ).