“nominally significant”

When considered as a continuous variable, the treatment by log e hs‐cTnT interaction was nominally significant ( P = 0.043) with a greater effect of empagliflozin on the combined risk of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure in patients with lower levels of hs‐cTnT when displayed as a hazard ratio, but not when displayed as absolute risk reduction ( Figure 2 ).

Liver eQTL analyses of rs277070 (A) and rs277072 (B) that are in LD with rs11212617 [R2>0.95 in the Caucasian (CEU) population] show nominally significant associations (P = 0.043 and P = 0.021, respectively) with increased ATM mRNA expression for the treatment response associated SNPs.

SNP rs2228547 demonstrated a nominally significant association with KBD in the allelic tests (OR = 1.242, 95% CI = 0.999–1.544, P = 0.043).

Among the variants that were included on the exome array, there was one nominally significant association with A-kinase anchoring protein 9 ( AKAP9 ) rs149979685 ( β = −3.117 (SE = 1.538) number–symbol pairs; p = 0.043) in African-Americans after adjusting for age and gender that did not survive adjustment for multiple comparisons (Supplementary Tables 6 , 7 ).

Multiple clinical and genetic predictors were evaluated without correction for multiple comparisons; the analyses are therefore exploratory, and the single nominally significant genetic association in the cohort, univariable CYP3A5 *1 carrier status ( p = 0.043), would not survive correction for the number of predictors tested and should be regarded as hypothesis-generating.

A trend towards an association of the T allele with lower HOMA-B (p = 0.063) was also observed; the association with metabolic syndrome was nominally significant (p = 0.043).

Fewer South Asian patients (10%) reported experiencing an ‘OFF’ period during the assessment, compared to White (23%) and Black groups (29%), but this was only nominally significant p = 0.043.

An exploratory analysis of variance within HCP subgroups suggested a nominally significant difference in treatment quality scores under #breastimplantillnesssymptoms ( P = 0.043).

A nominally significant association was found between rs17782313 (close to MC4R ) and percentage of energy intake from fat ( P =0.043).

P = 0.014), and the difference between males from FC and MO families was nominally significant (RR = 1.27, P = 0.043, adj.

In accordance with our hypothesis, we found nominally significant positive correlations of WIE Arithmetic performance with NPI total score (Spearman’s rho=0.208; p =0.043) and SMI self-aggrandizer scale (Spearman’s rho=0.231; p =0.027), but findings did not survive false discovery rate (FDR) adjustment for multiple comparisons (p FDR =0.189 and p FDR =0.243, respectively).

In this crude study of diabetes “progression,” they showed a nominally significant association between this beta‐PRS and insulin treatment ( β = 0.0131, SE = 0.006, P = .0431). 74 Another study among Japanese population explored the association between a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in Syntaxin IA and insulin requirement in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

In patient-clustered models, the CD68+–Ki67+ contrast remained significant (cluster-robust P = 0.0228, BH-FDR q = 0.035), whereas the CD8+–Ki67+ contrast was nominally significant but slightly above the BH-FDR threshold ( P = 0.0432, q = 0.052; Supplemental Table S5 ).

Nominally significant genetic correlation with COPD was found for both RHR (Rg = 0.0722; P = 0.0434) and HBP (Rg = 0.0751; P = 0.0467) (Table 1 ).

For marker rs1421292 (M24) a nominally significant association was also detected in the combined analysis (χ 2 = 4.06 p = 0.044).

In contrast, while the CN model showed a nominally significant interaction (p = 0.044), the non-significant slope in the LL/LD subgroup (β = 0.191, p = 0.153) fails to support robust moderation.

The authors state that no significant interactions were observed, yet a nominally significant interaction (p=0.044) is reported for HbA1c in the composite outcome ( 1 ).

The association between non-synonymous variants and PD was nominally significant in the Columbia cohort ( P = 0.044; P fdr = 0.231) but not in the meta-analysis (Table 1 ).

Nominally significant genetic correlations were observed between RA and CAD ( r g = 0.05, P = 0.044), and between T1D and CAD ( r g = 0.08, P = 0.034) (Fig. 2 a and Supplementary Table S3 ).

Heterozygotes for SULT1E1 rs3775779 demonstrated reduced DFS in univariate analysis, which remained nominally significant in the multivariate model (HR = 2.52; 95% CI = 1.02–6.18; p = 0.044).

We found nominally significant differences between pTau-positive and pTau-negative individuals for GCL in 6 TS ( p = 0.044) and 7 NS ( p = 0.043) sectors.

In ZMSC, a nominally significant association between cigarettes smoked per day and decline in Haemophilus[g] abundance was also observed ( β = − 0.789, se = 0.392, p = 0.044) (Fig. 3 d).

A nominally significant genotypic association (p=0.044) observed for SNP rs3087554 did not remain significant following Bonferonni correction (corrected p=0.396).

In the univariable MR analysis (Supplementary Table S1), after excluding outliers (rs1421085, rs62396185, rs12247907, and rs7791463 for beef; rs11211124 for pork; rs9379832 and rs35797675 for lamb) using the MR-PRESSO method, the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) approach revealed a nominally significant association between genetically predicted beef intake and breast cancer risk (OR = 1.511, 95% CI: 1.010–2.260, P = 0.044), with no evidence of heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy.

We found a nominally significant correlation between parents’ PRS for schizophrenia in the total sample ( r =0.121, p =0.0440) suggestive of genetic assortative mating for schizophrenia risk.