“nominally significant”

Similarly, ΔL3 was significantly increased when focusing on measurements deriving from the 800-g implants ( p = 2.98 × 10 –5 , Bonferroni adjusted p = 0.0002); whereas the Δ increase observed for 400-g implants was nominally significant, it did not pass multiple testing correction ( p = 0.031, Bonferroni adjusted p = 0.188).

There was a nominally significant relationship between TL and preeclampsia (PE) in the IVW model (OR: 0.799; 95% CI: 0.651-0.979; P = 0.031).

A nominally significant difference was observed for bevacizumab at the 12-month landmark, favoring grade 2 over grade 3 (68.3% vs. 37.2%, p = 0.031); however, this isolated finding was not supported by a significant global log-rank comparison across grades ( p = 0.09) and was not consistently observed at other landmarks.

Also an inverse relationship between milk and milk product SFA and the proportion of EPA was nominally significant after adjustments (for log-transformed: β = −0.069, P = 0.031).

A single nominally significant finding (procedure–LIX, p = 0.031, ε 2 = 0.05) would not remain significant after correcting for multiple comparisons.

When we re-analyzed these associations in follow-up models using DNAm age residuals that did not account for estimated WBCs (i.e., only age, sex, and the first two PCs were regressed out of DNAm age estimates), we found that results for measured WBCs were unchanged, but results for CRP were nominally significant, though they missed our a priori corrected p -value threshold (β = 0.15, p = 0.031; Figure S4 ).

A nominally significant positive association was found between Amount of Touchscreen Exposure and EEFQ-IC ( p = .031) and EEFQ-CEF ( p = .036, see Table 3 ).

The analysis for CNS promoter activation was nominally significant ( p = 0.0311).

In pairwise meta-regression using the first-line 1/2-gen EGFR-TKIs subgroup as the reference, the later-line third-generation subgroup showed a nominally significant difference ( p = 0.0311), whereas the first-line third-generation subgroup did not ( p = 0.1646).

This marker remained at least nominally significant when adding a covariate for high risk status (i.e. for whether the child comes from a high risk family or a control family) to the model (P = 0.0312).

, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan Institute for Comprehensive Medical Science Fujita Health University (Joint Usage/Research Center for Genes, Brain and Behavior accredited by MEXT) in Japan Decreased locomotor activity in BARP KO mice In the light/dark transition test, BARP KO mice showed a nominally significant decrease in total distance traveled in the light and dark chambers, and number of transitions compared with WT mice [genotype effect, F (1, 42) = 4.945, p = 0.0316; genotype × time effect, F (1, 42) = 0.100, p = 0.7536 and t = 2.939, df = 42, p = 0.0053, respectively] (Figures 2A,C ).

Similarly, leveraging a depression GWAS that includes up to 1,999,601 EUR individuals ( 26 ), depression showed only a nominally significant genetic correlation with GlycA ( r g = 0.138, SE = 0.064, p = .032), with an estimate that was about half of the one observed for PTSD.

Both Bw4T and Bw4I are in negative LD with DRB1*15:01 (d’ ij = -0.45 and -0.64 in cases, and -0.79 and -0.92 in controls, respectively) but the negative association of Bw4T with MS remains nominally significant (OR = 0.071; p = 0.032) even in the DRB1*15:01 negative stratum ( Table 7C ). 2.5.2 HLA Ligand with KIR Since the interaction of specific receptors and their HLA ligands is functional, we analyzed specific combinations of HLA ligands and KIR genotypes ( Supplementary Table S4A ).

11 We only found a nominally significant association of rs10191329 with the yearly change rate of the lateral ventricles ( p = 0.032), but not with any of the other 14 investigated metrics, including yearly change rates of the total brain volume ( p = 0.690), thalamus ( p = 0.953), or putamen ( p = 0.613).

meta-analysis ( 29 ), only ARRDC3 passed a Bonferroni-corrected P value threshold ( P = 0.00035), while WSCD1 was nominally significant ( P = 0.032); one of the Falconnier et al. genes had been filtered out during quality control processing in Carter et al.

38.9%), with a nominally significant difference in the remission rate (p = 0.032) but not in the response rate (p = 0.28).

34 Analyzing heritability enrichment on the tissue group level using s-LDSC with both annotation approaches, we found enrichment for brain tissue with both GTEx (coefficient p = 0.0038) and ATAC-seq annotations (coefficient p = 0.0072), whereas immune tissue enrichment was nominally significant only using ATAC-seq annotations (coefficient p = 0.032; Fig 1 ).

Nevertheless, observing all SNPs' association results of the PGC‐ADHD dataset at the LRP5 gene (Supporting Information Figure S3), a nominally significant signal could be seen in the male/female combined population at rs4988321 ( p = .032), which is in moderate LD with rs3736228 ( D ′ = 1.0, R 2 = 0.227 at CEU; D ′ = 0.967, R 2 = 0.266 at EUR) but not with rs4988319 ( D ′ = 0.219, R 2 = 0.009 at CEU; D ′ = 0.514, R 2 = 0.056 at EUR).

1.7%), with a nominally significant adjusted OR of 16.62 (95% CI 1.27–217.22; P = 0.032), though this estimate is imprecise due to sparse events and should be interpreted with caution.

For leaf C:N, although the global Elevation smooth was nominally significant ( p = 0.032; see Figure 2h and Table 2 ; Table S5 ), the term was effectively shrunk to zero (edf ≈ 0), indicating a negligible elevational effect on leaf C:N across species.

RGS4 was significantly expressed in the coronary artery tissue according to GTEx data (median transcripts per million =18.23), although rs10799925, an intergenic lead variant, and RGS4 expression showed only nominally significant eQTL association (normalized effect size =−0.150; p =0.032).

Dietary pattern showed nominally significant associations with barriers related to taste and texture, meal preparation knowledge, and preparation time (all p ≤ 0.032); none survived Benjamini-Hochberg correction across 12 simultaneous tests (false discovery rate-adjusted p ≥ 0.062).

When women with early menopause were added, breast cancer risk remained increased and ovarian cancer was also nominally significant (3.38 [1.15, 8.65]; p=0.032).

rs4766566 had a nominally significant association ( P = 0.032), but did not pass the significant threshold for multiple hypothesis testing ( Table 2 ).

Prior to multiple-testing correction, a single locus—D12S391—returned a nominally significant p -value ( p = 0.0320).