Barely Significant
← all phrases

“nominally significant”

7,733 sentences · 7,733 papers · 10,034 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.08

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

nominally significantP =.030.6× alphagold
Participants in the Sativex group demonstrated a pattern of improved cognitive performance as measured by the QbTest, nominally significant improvements in symptoms of hyperactivity/impulsivity ( P =.03), and trends toward improvement for inattention and emotional lability.
nominally significantp = .030.6× alphagold
The largest effect was found in CATIE, albeit with a large standard error, while the most significant effect was found in STAR*D, where all the tested P T showed nominally significant associations ( p = .03–2.5 × 10 −3 , R 2 = 0.5%–1.1%; Table S4 ).
nominally significantp=0.030.6× alphagold
While post hoc analyses failed to reveal any significant evidence that overall CNV carriership was associated with ADHD subtype, ADHD symptom dimension, or presence of oppositional defiant disorder, we did observe a nominally significant association (p=0.03 uncorrected) between conduct disorder and carriers of 15q13.3 duplications.
nominally significantp =0.030.6× alphagold
9 A nominally significant interaction between NYHA class at randomization and the effect of treatment was seen for the primary endpoint (better outcomes with NYHA class I–II; p =0.03; without adjustment for multiple comparisons), but not for the interaction between NYHA class and the effect on death from CV causes ( p =0.76). 9 Although the interaction is nominal, it confers a greater CV benefit to sacubitril/valsartan when initiated early in the course of HFrEF.
nominally significantp < 0.0300.6× alphagold
We also found nominally significant discrimination of unaffected siblings from healthy controls based on successful stop activation maps (AUC = 0.59, p < 0.030, 95% Modified Wald CI: 0.52–0.66 AUC) as well as nominally significant discrimination between participants with ADHD and healthy controls based on failed stop activation maps (AUC = 0.60, p < 0.019, 95% Modified Wald CI: 0.54–0.66 AUC, Fig. 1 ; for balanced accuracy, sensitivity and specificity measures in the complete and matched sample see Supplementary Table 2 ).
nominally significantp = 0.0310.6× alphagold
This dose group (10 mg TID) at 8 weeks also showed nominally significant improvement (Fig. 4 ) for both the ABC-C FX Irritability subscale ( p = 0.031, effect size 0.51) and the Parenting Stress Index ( p = 0.032, effect size 0.42), and trends toward improvement on the ABC-C FX Hyperactivity subscale ( p = 0.081, effect size 0.44) and the CGI-I ( p = 0.119, effect size 0.43) (Fig. 5a ).
nominally significantp = 0.0310.6× alphagold
When we re-analyzed these associations in follow-up models using DNAm age residuals that did not account for estimated WBCs (i.e., only age, sex, and the first two PCs were regressed out of DNAm age estimates), we found that results for measured WBCs were unchanged, but results for CRP were nominally significant, though they missed our a priori corrected p -value threshold (β = 0.15, p = 0.031; Figure S4 ).